Jump to content

Aaron vandenBerg not going - signs a new deal!!!

Tony Tea
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

47 minutes ago, Ron Burgundy said:

We will absolutely get ripped a new one re: the terms of this trade if AVB decides to leave - pick 42 or similar will not result in us landing a player of commensurate quality/value.

Really hope he stays. Kent too (although it seems that trade's virtually done and dusted).

 

Yes to Vanders but no to Kent.

Vanders gives you tough unforgiving footy 100 per cent of the time and Kent only in bursts. 

What we learnt from the finals is that you need players and the team giving 100 per cent. 

  • Quote
    • Like 3
     

    Sydney want picks for Blakey and I think we’ll hand over a couple of 2nd/3rd rounders for pick 12... and AVB of course.

    Edited by Mach5

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Love 3
    21 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

    Sydney want picks for Blakey and I think we’ll hand over a couple of 2nd/3rd rounders for pick 12... and AVB of course.

    Then use that pick on May?

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Love 1
     
    23 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

    Sydney want picks for Blakey and I think we’ll hand over a couple of 2nd/3rd rounders for pick 12... and AVB of course.

    In the words of Bruce, " delicious".

  • Quote
    • Shocked 1
    1 hour ago, Mach5 said:

    Sydney want picks for Blakey and I think we’ll hand over a couple of 2nd/3rd rounders for pick 12... and AVB of course.

    Pick 12 + sweetener to GCS for May? 

    Not what they have been carrying on about but better than other suitors can offer!

     

    As an aside, if we were able to do that deal for May, it would strengthen our hand a little in the Hogan trade.  Freo think we are desperate for May and that we will cave on Hogan to get May deal done.  Do the May deal and Freo start to sweat a bit more!!  That will be fun to watch.

    Edited by Lucifer's Hero

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    • Love 1

    You watch. Someone like that Muppet Browne will report now that we're trying to get May via trading 2nd and 3rd rounders for a 1st rounder.

  • Quote
    • Haha 2
    10 minutes ago, A F said:

    You watch. Someone like that Muppet Browne will report now that we're trying to get May via trading 2nd and 3rd rounders for a 1st rounder.

    Very clever footwork if you ask me!

    Is it my imagination or are the media talking down the trade value of our players out (Kent #72,  Hogan one 1st round) all the while talking up the value of other player trades eg Tim Kelly top 10 pick.  Lobbe a high 1st round pick etc etc.  

    Edited by Lucifer's Hero

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    45 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

    Sydney want picks for Blakey and I think we’ll hand over a couple of 2nd/3rd rounders for pick 12... and AVB of course.

    Interesting if that did happen we would be running out of picks to use in the draft? We'd need to get some picks back somehow to fill the list spots?

  • Quote
    •  
    17 minutes ago, Bonkers said:

    Interesting if that did happen we would be running out of picks to use in the draft? We'd need to get some picks back somehow to fill the list spots?

    We only need to bring in min 3 to our list. How many have we moved on and how many are we likely to pick up?

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Frustrated Demon said:

    Then use that pick on May?

    Potentially that and a sweetner might get us in with a chance if Jesse doesn’t end up in Perth. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    The usefulness of mid-late picks for Sydney's academy options adds a whole new dimension to our trading, in that we might be able to claw a late second round pick all the way up to a late first round pick if the accumulated pieces are worth it for Sydney.

    The AFL trade equivalent of uncrumbling a cookie.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    3 hours ago, hemingway said:

    Yes to Vanders but no to Kent.

    Vanders gives you tough unforgiving footy 100 per cent of the time and Kent only in bursts. 

    What we learnt from the finals is that you need players and the team giving 100 per cent. 

    Our young player are reaching their peak age in the next few years. It should offset the loss of VDB who is currently at his. A 25-26yo Petracca will be a sight to behold. Viney 24 right now, scary that he's getting better/stronger.

    Edited by johndemonic

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    47 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

    We only need to bring in min 3 to our list. How many have we moved on and how many are we likely to pick up?

    8 delistings or retirements so far I believe, with one of those from the rookie list. 4 players are currently on the trade table. We have 4 picks in this years draft. 

    Edit: I believe the poster was proposing to give up two picks for one first round pick which would be used on a trade. That would leave us with 2 live picks.

    We may get picks in return for Kent, Hogan and maybe Tyson so perhaps not an issue. 

    Edited by Bonkers

  • Quote
    7 hours ago, Mach5 said:

    Sydney want picks for Blakey and I think we’ll hand over a couple of 2nd/3rd rounders for pick 12... and AVB of course.

    I hope that does it. P12.

    That's about right for May, IMO.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Sydney now have pick 26 and 28. Is one of those picks fair compensation for losing a player we don't want to lose?

  • Quote

    Just now, Goodvibes said:

    Sydney now have pick 26 and 28. Is one of those picks fair compensation for losing a player we don't want to lose?

    I don't really know how this all works, but Jake Niall says that they were happy to swap 13 for 26 and 28 because those two picks give them the points they need to get Blakey as a father/son.

    If that's true, then they might not be interested in trading them.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    1 minute ago, titan_uranus said:

    I don't really know how this all works, but Jake Niall says that they were happy to swap 13 for 26 and 28 because those two picks give them the points they need to get Blakey as a father/son.

    If that's true, then they might not be interested in trading them.

    Read the AFL news

  • Quote

    I am still wanting Vandenburg to stay. Really adds to our mix. Ready to deliver in 2019. But if he wants to go then

    Vandenburg and MFC 3rd Rd pick 54 for

    Swans 2nd Rd pick 33

     

     

  • Quote
    10 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

    I am still wanting Vandenburg to stay. Really adds to our mix. Ready to deliver in 2019. But if he wants to go then

    Vandenburg and MFC 3rd Rd pick 54 for

    Swans 2nd Rd pick 33

     

     

    that would be a horrible outcome. I'd prefer we try and get a ready made player back like a George Hewett

  • Quote

    melbourne vs canberra vs tathra vs sydney

    Quote

    “His father died during the year and his mother is selling the family farm to move to Sydney, his brother is in the defence force (in the army) and lives in Sydney and his dad’s family is in Sydney. (Herald Sun 10/10/18)

     

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    Swans just got Picks 26, 28 and 40 in the McGovern deal.

    Perhaps they use one of those picks in the 20s for AVB?

  • Quote
    12 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

    Swans just got Picks 26, 28 and 40 in the McGovern deal.

    Perhaps they use one of those picks in the 20s for AVB?

    Swans need points for Blakey, so won't be giving anything up this year I would have thought. Maybe it'll be a future pick, or player (Nic Newman now he's not going to Nth??), I'd say this will be a late trade so we'd have to wait and see what else they come up with first. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    20 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

    Swans just got Picks 26, 28 and 40 in the McGovern deal.

    Perhaps they use one of those picks in the 20s for AVB?

    As @Red and Blue realist says Swans need points for Blakey and they get a 20% discount on the pick he is nominated at.

    26 = 729, 28 = 677, 40 = 429

    26 + 28 = 1406 which covers pick 6 = 1751 with the 20% discount, that should easily be enough.

    They already had 33 and 38, so maybe one of them or 40 in play for VDB.  Well played by the Swans.

  • Quote
    •  

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

      With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 14

      Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • 30 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Collingwood

      The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

      The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • 150 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Collingwood

      I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • 36 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Collingwood

      Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • 529 replies
      Demonland
    View All