Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Many of you will remember the ‘debate’ we had here about Frawley leaving to join the Hawks to chase the ‘ultimate’ success.

There were two camps at the time, one of which was quite generous in that they argued that Frawley leaving was absolutely acceptable in the circumstances - he was randomly drafted by the MFC (ie, not his choice), we were super carp, he had shown much loyalty to the MFC, his career would not last forever, so why not deprive him of the opportunity to taste ‘ultimate’ success elsewhere. It was an interesting debate - in many respects it hinged on what ‘ultimate’ success looked like to different posters.

I was firmly in the camp that ‘ultimate’ success was essentially about the journey with your team-mates, the club, the supporters etc that gives the quest ‘ultimate’ meaning. Without the shared journey, ‘ultimate’ success was saccharine, it was hollow.

Many disagreed - they argued it was all about ‘ultimate’ success (ie, winning a flag), and the ‘journey’ etc was just noise, emotive noise, which shouldn’t influence a player’s opportunity to taste the ‘ultimate’ success albeit with a new club. Snagging a flag with a club, with players, whom you met at the 12th hour, in the premiership window, was apparently just as meaningful as doing it with the club to which you were drafted.

In this context, I closely watched James Frawley last night. And I couldn’t help but thinking - I bet you envy the hell out of Nathan Jones right now, even though he has tasted ‘ultimate’ success, after all he has won a flag.

Irrespective of whether Jones ever gets to hold the cup aloft (and I bloody hope he does), I reckon he’s been far closer to tasting ‘ultimate’ success than Frawley ever has. In the context of their respective careers, ‘ultimate’ success is surely more aligned to leading an unpopular and much derided and widely patronised club, against all odds, to fertile pastures - it’s not been the easy road to success, but geez it must feel rewarding. And the legacy is surely more enduring.

I suspect Nathan Jones will eventually look back on these last two weeks, featuring heavily in 2 great contests in front of 90k plus passionate and expectant MFC dominated crowds, and feel super proud of his achievements. Genuinely proud. As he should. This, to me, is ‘ultimate’ success.

In my view, that’s got to feel better than jagging a premiership with a group of dudes whom you’ve just met.

 

 

 

 

Scully and Frawley both took the weak option.

They aren't 1000th the man that Nate Jones is.

Yes, it would have been great to stay at one club and win. 

Bit this isn’t happening in a vacuum; we needed young midfield talent so Brayshaw wouldn’t be helping us into a prelim if Frawley was still around and, again, we knew he was going to get us a top 5 pick so we didn’t actively keep him.

I just don’t think it is a a genuine argument to have a go at Frawley for being less loyal than Jones - we wanted to keep Jones...

 

I’d rather be In Jones’ shoes personally, but I think if he didn’t leave as a free agent, it’s likely we would have traded Frawley anyway in a list rebuild.

Not that we have traded many players out that wanted to stay, but he’s not what we needed.

Edited by Mach5

Frawley has a “Cheap” Flag....

he put the white flag up early in 2014 whilst still being paid. 

No respect. 


7 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

Scully and Frawley both took the weak option.

They aren't 1000th the man that Nate Jones is.

Yet plenty of geniuses on DL wanted Jones out of the side the second half of the season.

I don't blame Chip for what he did. Roosy himself wouldn't bag him upon leaving and was glowing in his praise. 

One reason for why I started the 'bathwater' thread was that I knew that the place was big on promises but less about keeping them. The new regime was in but it would have been difficult to tell if this was another false dawn.

That being said, Nate deserves so much praise for hanging on. A lot of others would have packed it in a lot earlier.

 
5 minutes ago, Colin B. Flaubert said:

I don't blame Chip for what he did. Roosy himself wouldn't bag him upon leaving and was glowing in his praise. 

One reason for why I started the 'bathwater' thread was that I knew that the place was big on promises but less about keeping them. The new regime was in but it would have been difficult to tell if this was another false dawn.

That being said, Nate deserves so much praise for hanging on. A lot of others would have packed it in a lot earlier.

Pre Paul Roos i would have agreed with you 100%, but once Roos was on board Frawley should have put his head down and gone for it, he chose the other option and played out the season at 3/4 pace, then couldn’t wait to put on that putrid strip and declare his love  

His Flag at Whorethorn, sure he got it, but “meh” few will recall. He is still mates with many of the players so i am sure he will be reminded...

I was firmly in 'pro Frawley leaving' camp. 

For one, we were always going to get great compensation for him. 

And Two, he lacked the personality traits to help make us great again. The complete opposite of Jones in fact. 

In short, the guy is not a thinker. 

And if you were to dissect his performance last night, you'll see what I mean by the way he plays. The bloke is made of fluff. 

I can imagine last night he would have had some 'what if I stayed' moments as the game was slowly slipping out of Hawthorn's grasp. I don't buy the view that supporters believe he'd be happy with the call he made. A premiership that he barely had anything to do with. 

Good riddance, we got Brayshaw. We are about to embark on an unbelievably exciting period for the club. 

Let's continue to ride the wave of these last few weeks. It's been magical so far. 

Edited by stevethemanjordan


Win-Win-Win IMO.

Hawks got a serviceable defender for free.

We got Brayshaw as compensation and replaced Frawley easily through drafting and trading.

Frawley himself has a flag, albeit a hollow one. But still a flag. And to be fair he could have won the Norm Smith in 15.

Can't blame him for leaving, I briefly gave up watching games in 2013. If a lifelong fan can stoop to such measures, then a guy with no real emotional attachment to the club most certainly can too.

Pardon my ignorance.

I was at the match  watching as closely as I could (but watching melbourne) did Frawley "do anything"  I cannot remember him getting hold of the ball, certainly if he did I did not recognise that it was him. Obviously not a great game cos the Demons won.    interested in others thoughts,   I did know he was playing but was really watching "our" players.

 

Another step up next week  Go Demons !!    we should be serous  about it now   no more dees   we are DEMONS !!

Chip was terrible in his last year at the dees. I was happy to see the back of him, especially with what we got in compo from the AFL.

This topic in some ways would seem to exacerbate the usage of saying that it's "not the Crown (goal) it's the Clothes (journey)" theory. This is one i agree with. I also wonder about whether the "choke" idea that was being tossed around yesterday had anything to do with the overwhelming mood afterwards. 

 

I don’t hold a grudge against Chip. Or even Scully.

Howe on the other hand can get stuffed after the way he carried on waxing lyrical about his love for Bucks and Collingwood. He showed little respect for the club that drafted him. I wish him no success. 

Needless to say, Jonesy’s loyalty and resilience is a rare thing. He has the respect of the entire football world and rightly so.


There was a game early in 2014 (rnd 2 I think) vs WCE.  Frawley barely jogged after his forward.  Put in no effort at all. 

He stamped his own papers that day.  Thereafter, Roos rarely played him in defence and started rebuilding our backline with players in it for the long term.

Frawley has the comfort of his medal.  Jones has the comfort of the esteem in which he is held by everyone past and present at mfc. 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

You’re either with us or against us.

Garland called Chip our and said a flag to him would mean nothing if it wasn’t at Melbourne.

Jones will be in our next team of the century and possibly captain of it depending how we finish. Frawley won’t even be remembered.

Already, Nathan Jones will be remembered for a generation after he retires and have a place in AFL history for longer than that.

Nothing is certain, but Jones can now wink suggestively in the direction of a premeirship of his own. And very few players in the history of the game could claim more credit for it.

But it is not like Frawley will be crying. He made a choice to be a good player in a great team rather than have the weight of a club on his shoulders, tasted success, and how now also had the fun of being repeatedly knocked out of finals in straight sets.

Frawley won the easiest flag in history. He waltzed into a winning team, barely did a thing and won a premiership. Satisfaction level low.

He can go eat a bag of dicks. 

The only thing that worried me about Frawley leaving as a FA was the compensation. I didnt trust the AFL, but they came through.

Having said that, I’m not entirely sure we deserved it based on the mythical equation. He wasn’t offered the world, even though it would be a lot to most.


You watch him live and wonder what happened to the gun defender from way back in 2010: backmen generally get better with age and experience but he's pretty bad, doubt he'd get a game with us or many other top sides anymore.

Frawley is a very good player but still get injured too often. Did his best but walked out for $$$ and quick glory. 

We got Brayshaw so no tears on Frawleys departure. 

I don't blame him for leaving and given how it turned out for us I'm glad he did.

I wonder what he thinks of his career, though. How much success does he gain from walking into a star-studded Hawthorn and winning a premiership in one year when that club was almost certainly going to win it whether he was there or not. The guys he was celebrating with, he'd known for 12 months or less. Some of them had played 10 years together and had built that club into what it was. 

I just can't believe he looks back on that flag the same way Trent Cotchin or Matty Boyd look back on theirs.

 
10 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Frawley has a “Cheap” Flag....

he put the white flag up early in 2014 whilst still being paid. 

No respect. 

Jonesy will forever be a legend at the dees. Chip will be a prem player that everyone forgets.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 167 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 46 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 328 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies