GOODBYE MITCH CLARK

[Sir Why You Little 34,924]

This is the nudge that does those excellent Trade period pieces with all the rumours collated in one post. So it isn't likely he knows more than we do.

And, no, Nudge, this isn't a 'go' at you and I am not being sarcastic about your trade period posts. I love those.

I am just going to take this post as seriously as I take those posts.

Let the man speak for himself...

[rpfc 27,637]

Let the man speak for himself...

You mean Nudge or the man he is speaking on behalf of - Mitch Clark?

Too easy. Far too easy.

[Sir Why You Little 34,924]

You mean Nudge or the man he is speaking on behalf of - Mitch Clark?

Too easy. Far too easy.

you are making assumptions and having a small dig at the same.

I want to hear what Nudge has to say concerning C & B's straight up question.

[Ethan Tremblay 28,535]

Barrett is going to have a field day with this thread...

Stop giving that squid ammunition!

Edited May 30, 2014 by Ethan Tremblay

[monoccular 16,394]

Here's hoping you have some inside knowledge, i won't get my hopes up but if this happens I'd be over the moon! Firstly for Mitch & secondly the club!

Happiness all round . Wait and see

[Chook in Perth 2,012]

This scenario is very much in play, feet and head permitting.

[Redleg 38,030]

As far as I know Clark is still on our list and will remain there, until a decision is made when the delisting period arrives.

I note he is still listed in the Senior Team List on the club website as well.

Edited May 30, 2014 by Redleg

[monoccular 16,394]

This scenario is very much in play, feet and head permitting.

And which particular scenario is that, Chook - there have been many mooted on this thread?

Any coincidence that this is dreamtime round??

[JV7 2,339]

Could there be something in NUDGE's post... Obviously Mitch had other things contributing to his ill health but he was been weighed down heavily by the large contract he was on and felt as though he was letting the club down. Could there be a theory in that he retired, organised a payout so IF he was fit & healthy & could make a return that he wouldn't be on such a large contract and if things failed again it he wouldn't feel like he was letting the club down... Also when he retired at the time I thought he'd be packed up and moved home to perth within weeks, from what I see on social media etc he is still in melbourne ? I know his health and well being is first and foremost but we can't help but hold out hope that there could be any signs of a comeback...

[Chook in Perth 2,012]

And which particular scenario is that, Chook - there have been many mooted on this thread?

Any coincidence that this is dreamtime round??

The scenario about him playing football again.

There's been a lot of rumour and innuendo as to why he retired, all of which is none of our business.

Remains to be seen whether he can physically and mentally cope. But he's training hard and wants to play.

That in itself is a significant step forward.

[Deetective Sgt. Taggert 380]

I would certainly be very surprised if the MFC and Mitch hadn't put plans in place for a possible return to the club. I mean from the perspective of both parties, not having such a contingency in place would have put even more pressure on what was already a very difficult decision, especially for Mitch. That doesn't mean it will happen of course, but I strongly believe the club would have made arrangements with the AFL to ensure he could return to the list next year.

[Binmans PA 26,492]

The scenario about him playing football again.

There's been a lot of rumour and innuendo as to why he retired, all of which is none of our business.

Remains to be seen whether he can physically and mentally cope. But he's training hard and wants to play.

That in itself is a significant step forward.

Really? Where has this been stated? Not having a go, mate, just wondering.

[Roger Mellie 3,601]

Great to hear from you Nudge.

Please feel free to swing past again around draft time (if not before).

[Pates 9,537]

Nudge's thoughts are something that I've seriously considered. By retiring he has removed the spotlight off himself and allows him to heal with no pressure for a return. I'm still of the opinion that if he returns it will be a massive effort but firstly he must get himself right before he considers a return.

[Grapeviney 8,977]

But he's training hard and wants to play.

Where's the proof to support either of these claims?

If you're referring to his tweet about getting back in the gym, that's hardly evidence that he's "training hard" or even that he's training with footy in mind...

[rpfc 27,637]

you are making assumptions and having a small dig at the same.

I want to hear what Nudge has to say concerning C & B's straight up question.

This is Nudge's 2nd post since September/October 2012 when he was BOG on this Board with his excellent rumour round up posts.

Nudge deals in rumour and we love him for it.

[Slartibartfast 16,021]

This is Nudge's 2nd post since September/October 2012 when he was BOG on this Board with his excellent rumour round up posts.

Nudge deals in rumour and we love him for it.

Have you actually got anything to add to the thread?

[1 red eye 1 blue eye 759]

Would be jumping around like the Duracel battery if this happened but realistically doesn't a September come back seem too soon?

[Sir Why You Little 34,924]

This is Nudge's 2nd post since September/October 2012 when he was BOG on this Board with his excellent rumour round up posts.

Nudge deals in rumour and we love him for it.

It is irrellevant what you think of Nudge....I don't care about that.

I want to hear what he has to say...If he has solid fact on Mitch Clark let's hear it...

[Chook in Perth 2,012]

Where's the proof to support either of these claims?

If you're referring to his tweet about getting back in the gym, that's hardly evidence that he's "training hard" or even that he's training with footy in mind...

Take it or leave. I don't care.

[Don24 103]

As far as I know Clark is still on our list and will remain there, until a decision is made when the delisting period arrives.

I note he is still listed in the Senior Team List on the club website as well.

he was removed from our list actually

[Binmans PA 26,492]

Take it or leave. I don't care.

No, I genuinely want to know. I'll take it, just tell me if it has been reported somewhere or if it's inside info you've heard etc. Thanks.

[Dees2014 2,377]

Why did he retire mid season?

He should've just stayed on the injury list and then make a decision at the end of the year.

I think it would have had a lot to do with the nature of his condition. You have to remember we are not dealing with broken bones here but a serious mental illness.sometimes the only treatment is a complete break.

It seems as though he might be recovering and maybe, just maybe, he might be ready to declare for the red and blue before he is due for formal delisting

at the end of the season. Let's hope so. I have no doubt if he was up and firing, we would be final eight material when you add in Hogan and a rejuvenated Trenners.

Edited May 30, 2014 by Dees2014

[Little Goffy 12,770]

I'd be more than happy to see him just playing at Casey next year. Less pressure, more time to do what he needs to do to keep himself healthy.

All depends on if it works for him.

As a side note, it would be a meaningful gesture to all those hand-wringing supporters on the brink of spouting bizarre hate because the man dared to have an illness. The betrayal!

[Dees2014 2,377]

I would certainly be very surprised if the MFC and Mitch hadn't put plans in place for a possible return to the club. I mean from the perspective of both parties, not having such a contingency in place would have put even more pressure on what was already a very difficult decision, especially for Mitch. That doesn't mean it will happen of course, but I strongly believe the club would have made arrangements with the AFL to ensure he could return to the list next year.

I think this is absolutely on the money. This is closest to the truth than any of the personal abuse threads prevalent on this topic. We have some very very smart people running the MFC these days, they are not going to let an A-grader like Clark go unless they are absolutely sure he can never return. If they can also reduce their expenses at the same time (as they have clearly done) and if he returned then he does so on a lower over base than before, then that is excellent management all round.

Right now though,we want Clarky to get healthy, no matter what happens to his football career in the future.

Edited May 30, 2014 by Dees2014