All about Mitch Clark

[hardtack 10,627]

oh bugger you hardtack what did I say that was disrespective of mitch , he is a great fav of mine , what did I say that shows disrespect , ? im waiting

Did I mention you BD? I was responding to Lordweaver's seeming justification for the comments flying around. I cannot even recall what you said and don't feel like going searching through this thread at the moment.

[BarnDee 287]

ah that's crap you accused me of being disrespectful , re mitch what did I say that was disrespectable over to you ,

[Lordweaver 235]

no barndee he was talking to me, all sorted

[Machsy 2,858]

y'know does mitch read these posts. I think not, you seem to be saying he does, where are your facts?

Should that matter?

Does that mean you say whatever you like without a care in the world because you don't think it's likely that one particular person will read it?

Most people don't live by those rules and prefer to hold themselves to a higher standard.

Since this forum is a privilege, not a right, I'd have thought most people would try to be respectful where possible...

[Lordweaver 235]

nice work machsy, I think this should be a forum where all points of view, outlandish claims, whatever can be aired and debated etc, not sure what your higher standards are alluding to, have another chardonnay

[BarnDee 287]

yeah ok I accept that ht but really its all a bit the same at the end of the day , opinions eh same have one , others are not to be heard from , , that's not good with me , ok

[Machsy 2,858]

nice work machsy, I think this should be a forum where all points of view, outlandish claims, whatever can be aired and debated etc, not sure what your higher standards are alluding to, have another chardonnay

Well regardless of what you think this forum should be, the owners of this site think the way they do and if nothing else, you should respect that.

[BarnDee 287]

ok cheers lord weaver , like ya thinkin , cheers mate go dees

[demoniac 1,336]

One is actively working to get his body right at the club while the other has taken 35k per week personal leave and is actively working on his photography. Slight difference?

Mitch Clark is obviously facing significant mental health issues and is doing the right thing and getting the help he requires to help him deal with those issues.

As his employer the Melbourne Football Club is doing the right thing and standing by him and supporting him as he seeks to get well.

That makes me proud of my football club.

You don't,

[Lordweaver 235]

I don't have to like it though but point taken

[hardtack 10,627]

ah that's crap you accused me of being disrespectful , re mitch what did I say that was disrespectable over to you ,

No... it just happened that you were being discussed by Lordweaver when I jumped into the conversation. Mine was a general comment not directed at any one person in particular, but probably prompted by my memory of mjt's rantings.

[Lordweaver 235]

35k a week for taking photos, yep I can get angry at that, and at the same time feel for him and hope he makes a good recovery, does one feeling have to come at the expense of another?

[bing181 9,328]

Having a contrary opinion is one thing. Expressing it in an abusive or disrespectful way is something entirely different.

[hardtack 10,627]

35k a week for taking photos, yep I can get angry at that, and at the same time feel for him and hope he makes a good recovery, does one feeling have to come at the expense of another?

It's ok to have the feeling... but there are some that want to blame Mitch for that.

[BarnDee 287]

WTF ? bing

[Lordweaver 235]

That's wrong but I won't get upset if they do either, they're only opinions afterall

[Cards13 9,117]

Yelling often and loudest doesn't make you right.

[rjay 25,093]

If he's just done a calf on the back of a hammy then I'd say as long as he's icing the calf, doing a bit of swimming or other light cardio that he can do then for the initial few weeks it will make little difference. At some stage in a few weeks time it will presumably be time for him to resume conditioning activities that are best served at the club. But if the other issues aren't sorted then it's a waste of time anyway.

The initial time away sounded like a good idea to me. But eventually after a break the best way for anyone to get back to their best is to get back to work if they can. WIthin about a month from now I would like to here that he's back at the club even if it's just part time for some conditioning and then some time with the players who are his friends.

Probably right here 'master', with the injury a bit of rest then back into the conditioning phase. If as you say the other issues get sorted that is.

[rjay 25,093]

Mitch Clark is obviously facing significant mental health issues and is doing the right thing and getting the help he requires to help him deal with those issues.

As his employer the Melbourne Football Club is doing the right thing and standing by him and supporting him as he seeks to get well.

That makes me proud of my football club.

You don't,

We think he is but don't know for sure. I think the depression card gets thrown around too easily and it may not be the case here at all.

[thaipantsman 180]

I received an email today suggesting that he may not play again and it was from a usually very reliable source, I hope it's wrong.

BTW another part of the rumour was he had altered his running style to accommodate the foot injury and that had lead to soft tissue injuries.

the person didn't have the initials RR?

[McQueen 17,867]

First time I'd opened this thread for a few days.

Seriously guys.

FMD.

[DeeZee 7,445]

I heard somewhere that his missus was homesick and went back home to WA taking his child with her,hence the big dilemma in his life.

The club allowed him to go back home and sort it out.

The injuries are secondary.

[sue 9,145]

sue a verb, yeah that makes sense, keep up the good work, god bless

That's not my picture either. Glad you are happy

[Gorgoroth 13,023]

Yep, this thread is done.

[Carrot Top 947]

Yelling often and loudest doesn't make you right.

WHAT!?!?!?!

SINCE WHEN?!?!?!

DAMMIT! NOW I'LL HAVE TO USE FACTS.

THAT'S NO FUN.