PRESEASON TRAINING: Wednesday 12th February 2025

[DubDee 26,283]

Any confirmation on if Judd was helped off the ground or not?

Coz you know as a grown adult that’s important to me

Get a life you few twats on here

[DubDee 26,283]

26 minutes ago, Dee Boys said:

But…the information was made up. Surely they’re just words to live by, for everyone?

Anyway, let’s move on FFS.

FFS 

Helped off or walked off, who cares? GW is clearly a great poster so why question a technicality? and if you do, do it once, not 5 times. Unless you get off your [censored] and provide a report yourself then STFU

If you need help leaving this forum i reckon there’ll be many volunteering to help you

[ManDee 7,311]

Ghostwriter nee WCW provides a wonderful view of our club how she sees it.

I frankly couldn't care less if there is an embellishment or an occasional error, the bulk of what she writes is fantastic. I am not suggesting she was wrong far from it.

I have followed the media for many years and find MOST reporting contains errors.

Please if you don't like Ghostwriter just block her, or if you have a different opinion say "I see it differently ....." 

I prefer her training reports to none.

[Dee Boys 827]

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

FFS 

Helped off or walked off, who cares? GW is clearly a great poster so why question a technicality? and if you do, do it once, not 5 times. Unless you get off your [censored] and provide a report yourself then STFU

If you need help leaving this forum i reckon there’ll be many volunteering to help you

Righto enough is enough.

The information she provided was wrong. She said McVee didn’t need any assistance from trainers being taken off the field, all I did was point out this was actually not the case. Would it be preferable if we just exist in some kind of fairyland where nobody disagrees with anyone and nobody is allowed to point out that somebody might actually be mistaken? If binman had made this mistake I’d have pointed it out, if dazzle had made this mistake I’d have pointed it out, if picket had made this mistake I’d have pointed it out. In no way was it a personal attack on GW. I didn’t insult her, I actually said I appreciate and enjoy her training reports.

Not once did I insult anyone, so I’ve got absolutely no idea how that has led to you saying “if you need help leaving this forum I reckon there’ll be many volunteering to help you”.

And I do try to provide training reports whenever I can attend on Wednesdays. Not to the detailed level that GW does, which, I’ll say once again, I appreciate!

Edited 15 hours ago by Dee Boys

[Salems Lot 2,679]

6 minutes ago, Dee Boys said:

Righto enough is enough.

The information she provided was wrong. She said McVee didn’t need any assistance from trainers being taken off the field, all I did was point out this was actually not the case. Would it be preferable if we just exist in some kind of fairyland where nobody disagrees with anyone and nobody is allowed to point out that somebody might actually be mistaken? If binman had made this mistake I’d have pointed it out, if dazzle had made this mistake I’d have pointed it out, if picket had made this mistake I’d have pointed it out. In no way was it a personal attack on GW. I didn’t insult her, I actually said I appreciate and enjoy her training reports.

Not once did I insult anyone, so I’ve got absolutely no idea how that has led to you saying “if you need help leaving this forum I reckon there’ll be many volunteering to help you”. 

And I do try to provide training reports whenever I can attend on Wednesdays. Not to the detailed level that GW does, which, I’ll say once again, I appreciate!

I must say I write a lot of posts on this forum that once I have written them I re-read before posting and then delete. It works reasonably well for me. ( hopefully this is not one of them...)

[Sir Why You Little 37,277]

426

[kev martin 10,662]

36 minutes ago, Dee Boys said:

The information she provided was wrong. She said McVee didn’t need any assistance from trainers being taken off the field

I was there, saw Judd go down, spasm, crawl, got up, hopped, then walked with pain and discomfort for about 20 meters till the trainers met him. Given his will power, I'd guess he would have made it to the boundary by himself.

Ghost could have seen the first part and made the opinion that at least he was able to move by his own and concluded it may not be too bad, being a more glass full kinda person. 

Her observations weren't wrong, just not a complete commentary. They also underpinned the opinion about the extent of the injury, which is more of a concern to me. Our thinking, it was not too bad, given he made his way towards the boundary by himself, before being assisted. We were hoping it was only cramp.

Edited 15 hours ago by kev martin

[dazzledavey36 55,700]

43 minutes ago, DubDee said:

FFS 

Helped off or walked off, who cares? GW is clearly a great poster so why question a technicality? and if you do, do it once, not 5 times. Unless you get off your [censored] and provide a report yourself then STFU

If you need help leaving this forum i reckon there’ll be many volunteering to help you

Matter of fact @Dee Boys does get down to training regularly on a Wednesdays. What are you providing again sorry?

And remind me why are we encouraging people to leave this forum because you simply disagree with his comment? Sensitive much...

I appreciate anyone who makes the time and effort in getting down to training and providing a report, I wish i could on a regular basis as a return of favour, but location wise i can't.

What happens in between those training reports is up to those individuals. 

Time to move on. Everyone is an adult here, they'll get over it.

[layzie 34,314]

4 hours ago, JTR said:

Some don't even have the balls to nit pick, they just sit back and wait for one of the other goon squad to do it, then throw in their little passive aggressive reactions to the post.

It's always the same people and it's always being done to the same person and frankly it is becoming tiresome.
 

Do you have the balls to name them?

 

[DubDee 26,283]

54 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Matter of fact @Dee Boys does get down to training regularly on a Wednesdays. What are you providing again sorry?

And remind me why are we encouraging people to leave this forum because you simply disagree with his comment? Sensitive much...

I appreciate anyone who makes the time and effort in getting down to training and providing a report, I wish i could on a regular basis as a return of favour, but location wise i can't.

What happens in between those training reports is up to those individuals. 

Time to move on. Everyone is an adult here, they'll get over it.

precisely my point. Thank you 

we are adults here. No need to pick and pick at training reports. just enjoy them. 

GW provides great reports as do many. Can we not bag her if she misses something? 

Claiming ‘misinformation’ and that was ‘made up’ is pathetic.

far out

Edited 15 hours ago by DubDee

[DubDee 26,283]

1 hour ago, Dee Boys said:

Righto enough is enough.

The information she provided was wrong. She said McVee didn’t need any assistance from trainers being taken off the field, all I did was point out this was actually not the case. Would it be preferable if we just exist in some kind of fairyland where nobody disagrees with anyone and nobody is allowed to point out that somebody might actually be mistaken? If binman had made this mistake I’d have pointed it out, if dazzle had made this mistake I’d have pointed it out, if picket had made this mistake I’d have pointed it out. In no way was it a personal attack on GW. I didn’t insult her, I actually said I appreciate and enjoy her training reports.

Not once did I insult anyone, so I’ve got absolutely no idea how that has led to you saying “if you need help leaving this forum I reckon there’ll be many volunteering to help you”.

And I do try to provide training reports whenever I can attend on Wednesdays. Not to the detailed level that GW does, which, I’ll say once again, I appreciate!

Apologies, I may have come in too hard.

my point is, try not to label reports as misinformation as someone may have seen a few seconds and reported what they saw

I appreciate you getting down to training 

Go dees

[bing181 9,407]

3 hours ago, DubDee said:

Apologies, I may have come in too hard.

Not at all. 

[John Demonic 5,882]

8 hours ago, BDA said:

the track reporting is great but the drama is tedious

I hope McVee isn't badly injured. Didn't look good on the footage

 

[Dee Boys 827]

6 hours ago, DubDee said:

Apologies, I may have come in too hard.

my point is, try not to label reports as misinformation as someone may have seen a few seconds and reported what they saw

I appreciate you getting down to training 

Go dees

No dramas mate.

Let’s move on! 🤪

[Demonland 73,418]

Exactly everyone move on. 

[58er 6,789]

8 hours ago, Redleg said:

You are aware that people seeing the same incident, often give different descriptions of it. That is a fact, as proved in Courts and Tests thousands of times.

Some people see parts of an incident that others miss, or simply mistake what they saw.

Maybe we can leave GW alone and just appreciate her contributions, without constant attacks for innocent variations of what might or might not have occurred at training.

Surely the important fact is how long Judd will miss, not how he left the training track.

One leads onto the other.

[DeeZone 10,367]

15 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

Yeah I meant for most of the walk. As they neared the boundary the Doc and the physio got under his arms. Point is, he was walking. 

Ps Ghostwriter who was the Bear for?👍😁💕

[george_on_the_outer 7,840]

15 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Slick.

 

PS: If anyone "likes" this post you can be sure they're over 60 years old. 

Only with good Grace…

[forever demons 2,302]

Ghost who walks ,who was the bear for

[Cranky Franky 2,188]

15 hours ago, Olgreybeard49 said:

Thought I might join the chat. McAdam is highly skilled, with evasive tricks and a good footy IQ. Marks as if he were taller, like Fritta. He's done the work and I look forward to his first game, where he kicks 3 and dishes off a couple.

Have prescribed vitamins to avoid further injury / illness and a small dose off apotropaic magic to ward of negative DL comments. He'll be fine.

Yes & he's 29, injury prone, has never played more than 15 games in a season & managed just 7 & 3 senior games in his last 2 seasons.

Definitely not the messiah.

[DistrACTION Jackson 10,069]

2 minutes ago, Cranky Franky said:

Yes & he's 29, injury prone, has never played more than 15 games in a season & managed just 7 & 3 senior games in his last 2 seasons.

Definitely not the messiah.

I think we moved past the messiah complex of years gone by.... let's leave that to Freo.

[Deemania since 56 6,763]

15 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Slick.

 

PS: If anyone "likes" this post you can be sure they're over 60 years old. 

Yep, probably ... actually, for me, a decade more in the generalised sense.

[DeeMee 918]

Why people want to pick up on the minutiae of details to get one up on track watchers is beyond me. I’m in QLD and really appreciate any information about the MFC and training I can get so thanks for the reports. 
For the nupties who seek relevance through nit picking and criticising reports - stop spoiling the fun and grow up.

Edited 5 hours ago by DeeMee

[picket fence 17,944]

Caaaaryst does it really matter whether Juddy,walked, crawled, was carried, escorted, transporter roomed,Tardis travelled,spiritually planed,transcendentally manifested or anything else to the boundary line?? Fact is he was injured, nothing else matters! 

Edited 5 hours ago by picket fence

[La Dee-vina Comedia 17,002]

12 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

ai says:

A high hamstring tear, also called a "proximal hamstring tear," is generally considered worse than a tear closer to the knee (distal hamstring tear) because the high hamstring is closer to the bone attachment point and can involve more severe tendon damage, potentially leading to longer recovery times and sometimes requiring surgical intervention in severe cases. 
 

Isn't the hamstring connected to the bone at both ends?