Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

So we find ourselves mid-way through the season (how time flies!).

To me this season has been particularly hard to identify the real contenders from the pretenders.

What does DL think?

Are Collingwood, PA and Brisbane the only solid candidates so far?

Are we closer to the contenders or the pretenders based on current form?

Looking forward to KB game, I can't help but feel we are a chance.

 

I reckon it will definitely come down to 3 three you've mentioned. The 4th team in a preliminary finally is going to be significantly out of their weight division (unless Geelong perks up).

When our intensity and pressure are up we can hang with those top sides, but we have too many lulls and unfortunately we just don't seem to have the ability to execute offensively when under pressure...which hurts in keeping the scoreboard ticking over against good sides.

 

Five contenders IMO. 

#1 seed: Collingwood - clearly the Premiership favourites and won't have to leave the MCG in September. 

#2 seed: Melbourne - not the second best side in it, but crucially we play the MCG well and should be able to do enough to qualify for 4th. Running games out much better than 2022. 

#3 seed: Port Adelaide - people underestimate them, they probably should have won the flag in 2020 and only had a horror prelim evening in 2021, while 2022 was never a chance for them after the first month. They've bounced back quickly and Butters/Rozee are approaching their prime. They strike me as the most likely to qualify for a GF off the back of two home final wins - but then lose the GF to Collingwood, us or Geelong.

#4 seed: Geelong - they just never go away and can easily get on winning streaks. They won 15 straight on their way to a flag last year. Will be strengthened further when Dangerfield and Duncan among others return. Old as hell, but for whatever reason their older stars never seem to slow down. A real wildcard.

#5 seed: Brisbane - I think everyone kind of feels the same way about Brisbane. They'll put themselves in the conversation but won't be able to get it done deep into September. 

 

Right now I wouldn’t have the Dees making prelim let alone winning one. 

Of course that could change.

Collingwood, Port, Lions are a lock. Spot 4 is up for grabs and I reckon Cats will make it given their home ground advantage. 


Still a long way to go this time last year we were the pies sitting top and favourites for the flag, we know how that ended we are no where near our best let’s hope we find it at the right time 

Collingwood got beaten in 2 of their 3 finals last year playing this exact game plan. Melbourne lost both finals and we justifiably have a question mark on us. Port Adelaide’s most important players haven’t played finals, and they looked horrible on the G a couple of months back. Brisbane away from Brisbane are always 50/50. Geelong can’t afford to make a single mistake from here, and you have to question their desire given their aging list got their flag.

This is a very open season. It will come down to who does the hard work week in and week out, and who can keep their best players on the park and playing well in September.

My money is on Melbourne. Our defensive game plan holds up, our best players are equal or better than any other teams, and, most importantly, I really, really want to see us win a flag in person.

Might reserve my thinking til   ...well...   after our next game.

All will be revealed then I'm thinking.

Ironically the game is often mocked as a psuedo Grand Final.

It wont be....   a Grand Final Test ?   Perhaps.

Ought to be a humdinger 

 

He who stays fittest wins. 
 

A fit Melbourne wins the 2022 flag. A fit Melbourne could win the 2023 flag. 

Where the Premiers were placed after Rd11 in the last 10 years:


2022 6th

2021 1st

2020 6th

2019 6th

2018 1st

2017 5th

2016 4th

2015 6th

2014 2nd

2013 2nd

Only us in 2021 and WCE in 2018 were top of the ladder at Rd 11 and 4 of the premiers were placed 6th.


42 minutes ago, rufus said:

I reckon it will definitely come down to 3 three you've mentioned. The 4th team in a preliminary finally is going to be significantly out of their weight division (unless Geelong perks up).

When our intensity and pressure are up we can hang with those top sides, but we have too many lulls and unfortunately we just don't seem to have the ability to execute offensively when under pressure...which hurts in keeping the scoreboard ticking over against good sides.

So can we make the prelim if we "perk up"?

This time last year no one expected Collingwood to make a prelim and if you had thought it, you'd have added that they would have been "significantly out of their weight division".

2 minutes ago, Big Col said:

Where the Premiers were placed after Rd11 in the last 10 years:


2022 6th

2021 1st

2020 6th

2019 6th

2018 1st

2017 5th

2016 4th

2015 6th

2014 2nd

2013 2nd

Only us in 2021 and WCE in 2018 were top of the ladder at Rd 11 and 4 of the premiers were placed 6th.

So Essendon for 23 premiers lol

8 minutes ago, brendan said:

So Essendon for 23 premiers lol

Ess were only 6W/5L at Rd11 (now at 7W/5L). Every Premier in the last 10 years was at least 7W/4L at Rd11.
I think we're still in with a shot this year and while I was the most despondent after a win I've ever been after Friday night, I feel better now. The Flag is wide open.

This is a wide open season. Much like last year and 2021.

We were absolutely not seen as a serious contender halfway thru the season in 2021. Demonland was full of dreamers and non believers. 

Round 13 onwards is when things start to crystallize. 

54 minutes ago, brendan said:

So Essendon for 23 premiers lol

There are some things we simply DO NOT joke about, Brendan. This is one of ‘em.

🤨

 


Butters and Rozee, and to a lesser extent JHF, are small bodied light midfielders who I think will struggle physically when targeted later in the year. 
they still have Wines, an ageing Boak, and PP as bigger midfielders, but not sure they are good  enough to get it done. 
will be top 4 id say, but not impossible to beat, even at Adelaide Oval 

 

 

The man everyone loves to hate, Kane Cornes, thinks we are right in it. See “the round so far”, this morning’s edition.

I've usually got a pretty good idea around 6pm on the last Saturday in September.

Can’t see Port winning it. Ranked 18th for one on one defending (36% loss ratio).  Has any team that [censored] at defending ever won it?


The fewer the injuries the better the chance of winning the flag.

Moore and NDaicos do hammies or concussion during finals and the pies look shakey. Butters and Wines. Neale and Dunkley. Oliver and Petracca. Bont and English. Cameron and Danger

2021 was the beautiful, perfect storm for us

i think you can throw a blanket over a bunch of teams

personally the notion of playing bears up there or the pear at the oval in a final would make me feel nauseous, as would the sound of the filth's braying mob

if i had to rank sides as likely contenders at this stage i'd have the order as:

  1. the filth
  2. the pear
  3. the bears
  4. us
  5. puddy tatts
  6. flagmantle
  7. footscray
  8. crom
  9. gc17
  10. peptides
  11. aints
  12. bloods
  13. tiggas
  14. gw$
  15. carltank
  16. poos&wees
  17. kangas
  18. meth coke

other than the bottom three or four, it's a pretty even competition and any team could surprise on their day

it's good for football

Edited by whatwhat say what

Our defensive and contest game is finding form. In the heat of finals this is the only part of the game that matters. 

We're still tinkering with the team and trying some new things too. despite the knockers were on of the highest scoring teams this year too. 

I think we're in an incredible position.

I'm becoming a cracked record but I cannot believe how many of our fans are writing us off. 

 
1 hour ago, whatwhat say what said:

i think you can throw a blanket over a bunch of teams

personally the notion of playing bears up there or the pear at the oval in a final would make me feel nauseous, as would the sound of the filth's braying mob

if i had to rank sides as likely contenders at this stage i'd have the order as:

  1. the filth
  2. the pear
  3. the bears
  4. us
  5. puddy tatts
  6. flagmantle
  7. footscray
  8. crom
  9. gc17
  10. peptides
  11. aints
  12. bloods
  13. tiggas
  14. gw$
  15. carltank
  16. poos&wees
  17. kangas
  18. meth coke

other than the bottom three or four, it's a pretty even competition and any team could surprise on their day

it's good for football

What's our derogatory nickname? Cheeseboards? 

Edited by John Demonic

  • Author
1 hour ago, whatwhat say what said:

i think you can throw a blanket over a bunch of teams

personally the notion of playing bears up there or the pear at the oval in a final would make me feel nauseous, as would the sound of the filth's braying mob

if i had to rank sides as likely contenders at this stage i'd have the order as:

  1. the filth
  2. the pear
  3. the bears
  4. us
  5. puddy tatts
  6. flagmantle
  7. footscray
  8. crom
  9. gc17
  10. peptides
  11. aints
  12. bloods
  13. tiggas
  14. gw$
  15. carltank
  16. poos&wees
  17. kangas
  18. meth coke

other than the bottom three or four, it's a pretty even competition and any team could surprise on their day

it's good for football

You seem pretty bullish on Freo.

I still think they can miss finals, and for our draft pick sake I hope they do.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 528 replies