Jump to content

Featured Replies

The top sides keep getting the job done which makes it even more upsetting that we lost. 

 
6 minutes ago, Winners at last said:

I hate Michael Long. I've never forgiven him for his brutal assault on Troy Simmonds in the 2000 GF.

Yep and everyone going oh what a great hit.

 
9 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

We stay fourth and win next week 

Do we ?

6 hours ago, YearOfTheDees said:

Interesting. Last night a Port Player did not leave the field though the interchange gate. Someone posted the footage and asked the question last night.

 

L AWS OF AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL 2022 25PART C
7. INTERCHANGE
7.1 INTERCHANGE STEWARD – APPOINTMENT AND DUTIES
A Controlling Body may appoint two Interchange Stewards to officiate during
a Match. The Interchange Stewards shall:
(a) be positioned throughout the Match at or near the Interchange Area;
(b) monitor and approve the interchange of Players made by each Team
during a Match; and
(c) report to the field Umpire any infringement by a Team of this Law 7.
7.2 PROCEDURE FOR INTERCHANGE
The following procedure shall apply to the interchange of Players during
a Match who are listed on the Team Sheet:
(a) unless Law 7.3 applies, the Players intending to interchange shall leave
and enter the Playing Surface through the Interchange Area;
(b) where a Player does not leave or enter the Playing Surface as specified under
Law 7.2(a), the Interchange Steward shall report the breach to a field Umpire
and the following shall apply:
(i) the field Umpire shall stop play at the first available opportunity;
(ii) a field Umpire shall award a Free Kick to the nearest Player of the
opposing Team; and
(iii) a Fifty Metre Penalty shall then be imposed from the position where the
Free Kick was awarded. For the avoidance of doubt, Law 7.2 operates
in conjunction with Law 5.5 where a Team has more than the permitted
number of Players on the Playing Surface

 

No Idea if a law has been breached here but here's the link. 


I reckon the big non MFC story this weekend is Geelong.

In order to make top 4 they’ll probably need to go 11-2 with major tasks against Dogs at Marvel, Port at AO, Brisbane at the GABBA, Collingwood at the G and (to a lesser extent) us at GHMBA.

I think they’ve lost too many games to be considered a flag chance.

12 hours ago, bobby1554 said:

Current Ladbrokes odds

I was channeling the great 'Chief' in get Smart.   We're not just favourites they have us as almost certainties.

 

 

If the Hawks lose today against the Eagles in Tasmania, the tank is well and truly on - if it wasn’t already. 

So apparently the benches get warned when you have 10 rotations to go 5 to go etc.

Dean rampe sitting on the bench was aware of it and jumped up straight away 


9 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I reckon the big non MFC story this weekend is Geelong.

In order to make top 4 they’ll probably need to go 11-2 with major tasks against Dogs at Marvel, Port at AO, Brisbane at the GABBA, Collingwood at the G and (to a lesser extent) us at GHMBA.

I think they’ve lost too many games to be considered a flag chance.

I agree but current market odds have them 4th in line for the flag. Crazy.

Today's Hawthorn v West Coast game will answer the ancient question;

"Can an entire team be penalised for insufficient intent?"

Infringing a mark from behind, is this day's curly rule of the Round.........COX to get three Frees

1 hour ago, whatwhat say what said:

north had TWO interchanges over the limit

they REALLY didn't wanna win that game

TANK HARD

The League has since confirmed to AFL.com.au that North Melbourne officials had been required to void the initial interchange breach, leading to Tom Powell returning to the bench after McLean's goal.


1 hour ago, whatwhat say what said:

north had TWO interchanges over the limit

They were unlucky that the infringement was given when the ball was in Sydney's forward line. In Sydney's back line it might have been a different result.

1 hour ago, dees189227 said:

So apparently the benches get warned when you have 10 rotations to go 5 to go etc.

Dean rampe sitting on the bench was aware of it and jumped up straight away 

Good grief if that is true.  If they can warn you when you have 5 to go etc, why can't they tell you "No More" as well.   And we wouldn't have a game decided in such a stupid way.

Did anyone know the penalty for an interchange was a free kick and 50m penalty in the worst area on the ground possible?


  • Author
1 minute ago, Elwood 3184 said:

Apparently the indigenous name for West Coast is Boorloo.

At least we know what the “loo” part stands for.

At home games, their fans just go  with the first three letters.

Edited by Demonstone

2 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

Today's Hawthorn v West Coast game will answer the ancient question;

"Can an entire team be penalised for insufficient intent?"

In actual fact, they are rewarded. (with draft picks)

Edited by Wadda We Sing

 

The big Karrinyup shopping centre in Perth near my home is extremely busy today. Traffic everywhere, car park full and cars parked on verges risking fines. No one is home watching the WC game today and going for retail therapy instead.

Edited by John Crow Batty

14 minutes ago, Wadda We Sing said:

In actual fact, they are rewarded. (with draft picks)

Hardly seems fair that Harley Reid should be punished.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
    • 47 replies