Just now, Demonland said:

me:

Told ya!

2 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

This is like waiting for a new Pope.

What does white smoke mean from the chimney? Upheld or overturned? 

Edited May 11, 20232 yr by Gawndy the Great

1 minute ago, leave it to deever said:

This is like waiting for a new Pope.

Exactly. Except this is important!

4 minutes ago, Brownie said:

Haha is anyone looking at the blog or are we all on here expecting some is!

I was on the blog but just couldn’t hold on anymore waiting for the Decision 

 

2 minutes ago, monoccular said:

QD - I am getting bored and thus pedantic.   It is a regimen.  A regime is a despotic dictatorship, like the AFL

I'm blaming https://openai.com/

Just now, leave it to deever said:

This is like waiting for a new Pope.

We’ve hit the hour and a half mark. 

Just now, Gawndy the Great said:

What does while smoke mean from the chimney? Upheld or overturned? 

I get the feeling we're going to have smoke blown up our collective chimneys.

and now for something completely different

storm score the first try

1 minute ago, Gawndy the Great said:

What does while smoke mean from the chimney? Upheld or overturned? 

What colour is cigar smoke, after the Port and cheese?

The long deliberation is all optics so they can say they heavily considered it. 

3 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Will Houghton KC is representing Melbourne and young star Jacob van Rooyen.

 

He is arguing that rule 18.5.1 is there to protect a player whose sole objective is to either contest the mark or spoil the mark. He says rule 18.5.3 contains a protection or an immunity to the player, when their sole objective is contesting a mark or seeking to spoil a mark, from being charged with a reportable offence.

 

The rules:

18.5.1: The Player whose sole objective is to contest or spoil a Mark shall be permitted to do so. 

18.5.3: Incidental contact in a Marking contest will be permitted if the Player's sole objective is to contest or spoil a Mark.

 

Houghton argues that van Rooyen spoiled the mark using an outstretched arm and fist to punch the ball away, which should be the end of the matter.
 

That’s our case.  How can they suspend him !!! 

2 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

Who are we playing this week? Does it matter. 😂

#freeJVR

The principle matters!

The panel preparing the verdict:

 

2 minutes ago, Demonland said:

We’ve hit the hour and a half mark. 

That’s like 8 pints. 🤔 

 

I’d be moving on to the nose nachos now. 

Edited May 11, 20232 yr by McQueen

Just now, Demonland said:

The long deliberation is all optics so they can say they heavily considered it. 

Exactly

5 minutes ago, AzzKikA said:

Subscribe to get rid of ads

https://demonland.com/forums/topic/39509-remove-the-ads-with-a-demonland-subscription/page/5/#comment-2285352

 

Worried about getting hacked

Over 90 minutes to decide a one second act.

What does that say about reasonableness.

I still think we win.

Where is the appeals' board duty of care to demon supporters?

Making us wait for an acquittal is cruel and unusual punishment.

A duty of care ruling is so complicated for these adjudicators of sport, what hope has the player in split second decisions got,

1 minute ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Are you talking to your own spirits Norm? 🤪🤪

I give up  I'll check back later 

1 minute ago, McQueen said:

That’s like 8 pints. 🤔 

Do you have a broken arm Steve?

1 minute ago, Redleg said:

Over 90 minutes to decide a one second act.

What does that say about reasonableness.

I still think we win.

Weren't the original tribunal members going on about 0.8 seconds??

what do all the colours mean for the viewers @Demonland?

Orange?

Red?

Blue?

Dark Blue?