Jump to content

Featured Replies

Is Ben Brown dropped due to form or is he carrying anything?

he has easily been our best tall fwd this year

 
35 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

DIESEL

Oops

Thanks Saty.

Edited by kev martin

2 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Is Ben Brown dropped due to form or is he carrying anything?

he has easily been our best tall fwd this year

Form.... carrying something.. 🤔🤔🤔🤔

 

 
49 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

They’ll look to stretch us for height, especially after the Essendon approach last week.

typically we’d just run all over them but with the short break and injuries to some of our smalls, there is more risk in this game than I’m comfortable with.

Add in the fact that North are absolute full strength (aside from Xerri) as compared to Richmond who had about 7 of their best 22 out last week.

I get the slight discomfort but we don’t have any business losing this one.

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell

1 hour ago, kev martin said:

Lever was calling out a nickname to Schache.

"Weasel",  I was taken a back.

Perhaps he has weaseled his way into the team, or his bonding with deep and meaningful discussions. 

I'm told the nickname was Diesel. 

Sorry for the misleading information. 

Lever was really animated when the calls came, called it out three times. Funny how I misheard.

Edited by kev martin


15 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

I just realised it. The Deez media division ^%&*@#-!p the media release. They reversed the lines. Should have read:

B: J Jordon, J.van Rooyen, J.McVee

HB: J.Viney, J.Schache, M.Hibberd

C: E.Langdon, C.Oliver, T.Sparrow

HF: A.Brayshaw, B.Fritsch, T.Rivers

F: J.Bowey, S.May, J.Lever

Makes much more sense this way.

I’m much happier now, except I’m not sure if we should reverse the rucks with the interchange? But thanks. 

16 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Is Ben Brown dropped due to form or is he carrying anything?

he has easily been our best tall fwd this year

IMO Schache has shown a good string of games in the 2s, and has been rewarded. BB and TMAC had stinkers so they stay at Casey. We have enough options to have each tall compete for their spot in the 22. 

 
1 hour ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Who’s says Goody doesn’t change things up? Fritta at CHB

Well if anyone can kick em from half-back it will be Fritta 

2 minutes ago, MrFreeze said:

IMO Schache has shown a good string of games in the 2s, and has been rewarded. BB and TMAC had stinkers so they stay at Casey. We have enough options to have each tall compete for their spot in the 22. 

Ben Brown kicked 4.1, 4.0 and 1.0. The Sydney game was a stinker but surely it's harsh to punish a proven performer for one poor game. Especially with JVR playing, we really need a proven, experienced tall taking the best defender.


2 hours ago, DubDee said:

Schache hasnt played more than a couple of AFL games in a row since 2019. Not sure you can call him a bone fide AFL player. He is in his 8th season and hasn't shown much to date.  Brown is miles ahead of him even if not 100%

But Schache is fit and in some form  - BBB seems to be neither. 

2 hours ago, heath55 said:

Honestly don’t understand why people care? It literally does not matter whatsoever. Only thing that matters is who is actually named

But how cool would it be for Goody to line them all up in those positions at the start just to fry our brains.

11 minutes ago, monoccular said:

But Schache is fit and in some form  - BBB seems to be neither. 

Its such a simple metric of consideration really isn't it. 

Schache ahead of Brown/McDonald is a bit of a statement re the latter two. Beginning of the end for them?

Hope the selection sends a strong message re perform or stay at Casey, for TMac bb in particular.  Force them to up their games.

Dunstan unlucky to miss, but maybe there is more he needs to demonstrate to get a gig??? Or maybe he is a single role player that is not ‘open’ with Viney and Clarry ahead of him?


4 minutes ago, bing181 said:

Schache ahead of Brown/McDonald is a bit of a statement re the latter two. Beginning of the end for them?

Hard to argue the negative.

At least there is some ‘selection integrity’…

Funny how that integrity never keeps your stats out of the team tho.

I dunno, I thought BBB was fine but maybe the KPIs are the real truth? 

26 minutes ago, monoccular said:

But Schache is fit and in some form  - BBB seems to be neither. 

Brown did a preseason and played all season. how is he not fit?

1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

A few posters have expressed doubts and concerns about the game against North.

I don't get it! 

I think confidence is wavering a bit because of the Essendon loss and the Richmond game which was a struggle to win even with all their outs plus the short break on top of that

Edited by Orion

1 hour ago, beelzebub said:

Form.... carrying something.. 🤔🤔🤔🤔

 

Not so - was at the Casey game and he was running all over the ground.

 

54 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Ben Brown kicked 4.1, 4.0 and 1.0. The Sydney game was a stinker but surely it's harsh to punish a proven performer for one poor game. Especially with JVR playing, we really need a proven, experienced tall taking the best defender.

DubDee BBB has been having back issues and will need to prove his fitness before coming back, plenty of time for BB.


1 hour ago, DubDee said:

Is Ben Brown dropped due to form or is he carrying anything?

he has easily been our best tall fwd this year

BBrown is having back issues and coming back via VFL to ease him back in and prove his fitness. It’s a shame as he was in great form before getting injured.

I don’t expect BBrown or TMac to be in the team next year and wouldn’t be surprised if either retired at the end of the year despite being contracted for one more year. They’ve both been good players over the journey, but their bodies are packing up and neither can stay out in the park or maintain form once they make it out there.

29 minutes ago, Dingo said:

Not so - was at the Casey game and he was running all over the ground.

 

Bit more to the game than running.

21 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Bit more to the game than running.

like averaging 3 goals per game at AFL level this year?

 
2 hours ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Hi DJ. As much as that concerns me my response related to the inclusion of No.19 up front. I guess their best defender goes to JVR then? 

Maybe their best defender is going to CHF to look after Fritta

14 minutes ago, DubDee said:

like averaging 3 goals per game at AFL level this year?

And a massive 4 behinds in the VFL last week.

We can't be saying we want to reward form in the VFL and then reward BBB with his 0.4.

Do I want to see BBB back in? Of course. It's hard to deny Schache a chance based on his VFL form though.

Edited by deva5610


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 142 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 39 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 318 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies