Jump to content

Featured Replies

Sorry all, don’t mind my likes and laugh emojis / reactions to posts on this thread from back in 2022. They were funny! And seemingly still current…(I thought they were!)

 
1 hour ago, old dee said:

Or they are simply  not senior AFL level talents 58er. IMO they fall into the group of too good at vfl level NQR at senior level. 

Well OD you still are writing off YOUNG players OFF too early in their career. You expect players never to be given opportunities in other positions or are so impatient for success for some. 

Joe many of our current players have you written OFF ?

About 25/20!! 

Will never make it 

Ate not AFL standard after 5/6 games !! 

Doesn’t show  any thing to be a senior player ( after less than 10 games) 

Players need encouragement and time and patience and you don’t want to give them that.

Yes we can make predictions but unrealistic chance of a fair go is not the answer.  
2/3/4years is often necessary for proper player development. 

Far too negative and rushed with your opinions for an AFL Club yo develop it’s list.Msybe we need to trade a bit more fit ready made stars!! 
 

 

 

 

From the club website today, confirmed hand fracture and had surgery today. Expected return TBA

 
3 minutes ago, picket fence said:

From the club website today, confirmed hand fracture and had surgery today. Expected return TBA

Has him down at 1 - 2 weeks PF, a good result

4 hours ago, 58er said:

Well OD you still are writing off YOUNG players OFF too early in their career. You expect players never to be given opportunities in other positions or are so impatient for success for some. 

Joe many of our current players have you written OFF ?

About 25/20!! 

Will never make it 

Ate not AFL standard after 5/6 games !! 

Doesn’t show  any thing to be a senior player ( after less than 10 games) 

Players need encouragement and time and patience and you don’t want to give them that.

Yes we can make predictions but unrealistic chance of a fair go is not the answer.  
2/3/4years is often necessary for proper player development. 

Far too negative and rushed with your opinions for an AFL Club yo develop it’s list.Msybe we need to trade a bit more fit ready made stars!! 
 

 

 

 

I hear what ya saying 58.

I will offer a caveat on ODs behalf . I know for a fact he has watched many a Magoo Match. I'd be very surprised if he was writing anyone off without considerable thought.

JVR looks like he belongs out there....but he's  still raw.  I too am not convinced Jeffo is going to develop a lot further.  But as you rightly suggest... he's young. 

I'm not.... I can remember when Neeta first came on the scene, Ox too.   They showed something special.  Jeffo..  😒 🤔 

Obviously time will tell


21 minutes ago, picket fence said:

From the club website today, confirmed hand fracture and had surgery today. Expected return TBA

 

18 minutes ago, adonski said:

Has him down at 1 - 2 weeks PF, a good result

So many different types of “hand fracture” - if that is all we get to know, could be anything from 2 - 10 weeks. 😩

5 hours ago, Spargonicus said:

Sorry all, don’t mind my likes and laugh emojis / reactions to posts on this thread from back in 2022. They were funny! And seemingly still current…(I thought they were!)

No worries. 

Always good to be reminded how funny I am.

  • 1 month later...
 
2 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

I can’t see him making it due to lack of effort unfortunately. He was a passenger yesterday.

Agree 100% FT. He just doesn't show intent. Another Weid. In fact Weid was way better IMO.


I think he’s shaping up to be a bust. It was a pretty ordinary draft though. Some players around MJ’s range have been delisted or traded already. Our other option was Ed Allan who looks OK but certainly no world beater. In hindsight, we probably should have traded the pick.

18 minutes ago, old dee said:

Agree 100% FT. He just doesn't show intent. Another Weid. In fact Weid was way better IMO.

Weid would be serviceable in our forward line this year.

At least he can take a contested mark unlike JVR and Jeffo.

I am a supporter of Jeffo, though not as fanatical as his number 1 fan Picket Fence.

I must admit I am getting a little concerned. If he gets another chance he needs to take it.

Edited by Redleg

On 28/11/2022 at 20:28, spirit of norm smith said:

A young raw key position forward.  Jefferson takes some good marks and has a simple kicking technique.  He drops a few as well and looked awkward in his second efforts.  Like a young Max King is how I’d describe Jefferson.  We need to be patient.  He needs lots of protein shakes, gym work for 3 years and a determination to succeed.  
Drafting young key forwards is a risky choice.  From Cook to Weideman to Hulett, we’ve not been successful.  Yet with BBB on one leg and Tmcd on the other side of 30, the outlook for a future of a “JVR and Jefferson” combo is the opportunity that ultimately looked the deciding motivation for JT.  

@dazzledavey36 not sure that the demonlanders were convinced with JTs selection back in the 2022 draft. I’m still giving Jeffo some time (I think he needs to go back to Casey for a block of games 6-7) before we give him another go. Your prediction of Jeffo being “more of a 3rd forward type in the mould of Jack Watts” is closer to the mark.

Another Timid Key Forward

It’s just so obvious that Goodwin and his Coaching staff do not regard the forward 50 as being very important

It’s all about Contest and Defence, attacking the goals to Simon is Kick and Hope

We cannot keep going down this road

The Squad is completely stuffed by 3/4 time

This style of play has been evident since 2021

How many times in the last 4-5 years have we had games where we Dominated the Stats sheet, but lost badly on the Scoreboard (kicking 8.15 or something similar)

It must be stopped…..


6 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

there's nothing about his game that indicates he'll make it at afl level

Hate to pot a young player, but i think it’s true. year 3 now and looking like year 1

1 hour ago, Wells 11 said:

Hate to pot a young player, but i think it’s true. year 3 now and looking like year 1

We can put down the glasses he is average at Casey most weeks. Will be gone at the end of contract.

Jeffo is contracted until the end of 2026 and is 21 years old. Like some I'm not sure if he'll make it as a senior footballer but I wonder if we're conflating our urgent need for key forward with the speed of his development. It didn't happen for Max until he was 24 years of age.

Edited by Rab D Nesbitt

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

I am a supporter of Jeffo, though not as fanatical as his number 1 fan Picket Fence.

I must admit I am getting a little concerned. If he gets another chance he needs to take it.

Absolutely thrown to the wolves and Goodwin and his team need to explain the rationale for his inclusion on the weekend after minimal form and injury he is plucked from obscurity to play. Well it reeks of desperation because in the end, they have set him up for failure. If he is dropped as expected his confidence will be shot to the shizzen and I will be very angry. The ONLY salvation is if they have come to the conclusion that come whatever may, form or no form play him for weeks and see what he can do. If he plays this week I will be mildly surprised but expecting the knee [censored] reaction and he plays at Casey. Fritsch and Van Rooyen will somehow survive. As I suggested they have potentially set him up for failure!


Just now, picket fence said:

Absolutely thrown to the wolves and Goodwin and his team need to explain the rationale for his inclusion on the weekend after minimal form and injury he is plucked from obscurity to play. Well it reeks of desperation because in the end, they have set him up for failure. If he is dropped as expected his confidence will be shot to the shizzen and I will be very angry. The ONLY salvation is if they have come to the conclusion that come whatever may, form or no form play him for weeks and see what he can do. If he plays this week I will be mildly surprised but expecting the knee [censored] reaction and he plays at Casey. Fritsch and Van Rooyen will somehow survive. As I suggested they have potentially set him up for failure!

He’s in his 3rd season, he’s not a baby anymore, at some point you’ve got to see what you’ve got

2 hours ago, Bang Bang Bang said:

I think he’s shaping up to be a bust. It was a pretty ordinary draft though. Some players around MJ’s range have been delisted or traded already. Our other option was Ed Allan who looks OK but certainly no world beater. In hindsight, we probably should have traded the pick.

Josh Weddle was also still available when we took Jeffo.

 
10 minutes ago, Greg Schneider said:

He’s in his 3rd season, he’s not a baby anymore, at some point you’ve got to see what you’ve got

Jeffo is still finding his way. 3rd year in for a skinny kid still developing with body as a KPF should be given more time. He may be a bust, he may turn out ok.

He does ok at VFL and will develop more. he was always going to take time.,

53 minutes ago, old dee said:

We can put down the glasses he is average at Casey most weeks. Will be gone at the end of contract.

You are a hard man old dee. PF has the rose coloured glasses, yours are cack brown 🥸🕶️👓


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies