Jump to content

CHANGES: SF vs Brisbane

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

gut feel, trac wont play, for some reason I think Spargo wont play either.

 

we are a bit banged up for this game.

If we are dropping it ion the forwards heads in the pocket, for me, it means we are not being creative enough= game over.

Sydney did well to keep May occupied, I think Brisbane will try the same this week. At least Harmes will be able to tag.

Is Gawn playing more forward because he is carrying an injury? I hope to [censored] that we are not going with Grundy, spend the money on a forward coach that can create a connection with the midfield. 

 

Hope we smash them.

    • Like 1
     

    Outs Melksham, Tracc, Spargo

    Inns Bedford, Dunstan and one of Mc Donald or Smith with Chandler as sub

    • Like 1
    6 minutes ago, poita said:

    Absolutely zero chance of any unforced changes this week. Goodwin has hitched his wagon to this group, and will work them into the ground before changing his mind. I'm also expecting us to err (yet again) on the side of taking unnecessary risks with injured players, rather than taking 22 fit players into this week's game. 

    I'd be happy to see Spargo miss, Melksham take his role across half forward and another tall forward come in (McDonald preferably if fit). I'd also like to see Brayshaw back to the wing and Dunstan into the midfield, particularly if Petracca doesn't play. I don't think Harmes' positioning is good enough to play what is such a specialised role in our setup. Sparrow to miss if Petracca is fit.

    I could make a very strong case for both Jackson and Salem to be dropped, but the chances of either happening are so miniscule that I won't bother.

    Spargo was a great link player into the fwd line, all his possesions were damaging.

    Unfortunately he doesnt get enough of it, not his fault being effectively played out of position on the wing at times, but I miss Brayshaw on the wing..... him and Langdon had it covered and its what won us a premiership

    • Like 3
     
    3 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

    I don’t subscribe to the theory that medical staffs always make the right decision. AFL history is littered with stories of quite the opposite. Medicos are always trying to mitigate other factors that aren’t exactly in the player’s best interests. Strangely, one of the biggest forces that go against the welfare of the player is the player themselves. 

    Didn't you know that this forum is the best predictor of a players readiness to perform?!

    For mine, the more interesting selection dilemma is whether Tmac is ready enough. We desperately need another tall forward who is a forward, not a ruck. If he's ready, ANB or Melk might be omitted, unless Spargo cannot get up

    As good and irreplaceable as Tracc is, we have others that can fill that role. Not a great fan of Dunstan, but he is a hard bodied player that could come in

     

    • Like 1

    Bring in Chandler for ANB,

    Dunstan for Tracc,

    JVR or Smith for Melksham.

    And i'd like to get Bowey back in, but not sure who go out.

     

    Edited by Neil Crompton

    • Like 3

    Any update on Spargo's and Fritsch's injuries?

    • Like 2
    8 minutes ago, picket fence said:

    Outs Melksham, Tracc, Spargo

    Inns Bedford, Dunstan and one of Mc Donald or Smith with Chandler as sub

    Yes, Smith hasn’t been mentioned much in this discussion, but he was the medi sub on Friday. If another marking forward comes in, then it could, probably should, be Smith

    I think what we desperately need to see is a second tall up forward. Ben can’t do it on his own, he isn’t good enough.

    Tmac or JVR for melksham would be a start. ANB probably should go but no one we have to replace him inspires me. Harmes can stay because I’d like to see him on Neale. 
     

    I’m confident we’ll turn it around and beat Brisbane again, but not so much for the week afterwards. Having said that, this group has surprised me many times before and who knows, maybe that Sydney game is the kick up the a** we need. 

    Edited by Smokey

    • Like 1
     
    15 hours ago, McQueen said:

    If Tmac is still too risky I’d give Joel Smith a crack at Melksham’s role. 
     

    The way Melksham carries himself on the field is so depressing to watch. 
     

    And Bedford for ANB. 

    Steve, Smith was out longer than Tmac and starts off with less skill. Play Tmac at 90% he is better than Smith and I like Smith.

    Smith has had two games at Casey and Tmac one. Not much difference.

    • Like 5
    23 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

    Yes, Smith hasn’t been mentioned much in this discussion, but he was the medi sub on Friday. If another marking forward comes in, then it could, probably should, be Smith

    Smith will fly against BBB, Gawn and LJ. He is not a leading forward. It would have to be Weid or Tom.

    • Like 3

    8 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    Smith will fly against BBB, Gawn and LJ. He is not a leading forward. It would have to be Weid or Tom.

    So Tom or no one!

    • Like 2
    38 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

    I don’t subscribe to the theory that medical staffs always make the right decision. AFL history is littered with stories of quite the opposite. Medicos are always trying to mitigate other factors that aren’t exactly in the player’s best interests. Strangely, one of the biggest forces that go against the welfare of the player is the player themselves. 

    Oh totally, understand a player will do/say what he can to play a final, weigh up risk vs reward.

    I'm no medical practitioner but from what i've heard seeing its a non-weight bearing bone it should be ok for him to play (Pending recovery from other issues and assessment of pain)

    But i am sure there are other medical opinions that may differ, so who knows aha

     

     

     

    I will try this.

    Out- Trac, Melksham, ANB

    In- Bowey, JVR, Dunstan.

    Salem to play Wing/Forward, Bowey to defence. 
    Harmes to play a lot more midfield time.

    No point playing Weid as he is always caught out of position, JVR reads the ball better and hits the pack harder, experienced or not- he is our best option other than Mitch Brown who has been tried.

    • Like 4

    JVR has to be considered…surely. We need another tall and at least he is fit. From what I understand he is a real competitor.

    Jye Amiss played in Freo‘s final on Saturday night and was excellent in what was only his second game. No reason JVR can’t do the same

    • Like 1

    It's more about roles than players. Assuming Petracca is out of the midfield, I expect Brayshaw to play his role leaving Harmes to take up the tagging role on Neale. That leaves a spot on the wing available, but with no Jordon, we have to find someone. I'd expect Bedford to get that role. 

    If Petracca plays permanent forward, it depends on the fitness of Melksham and Fritsch as to who goes out. If Fritsch is OK, then Melksham has to go . If Spargo isn't fit, I expect Chandler to take his place, not Petracca.

    So, I expect Bedford in for Melksham (unless Fritsch is not fit). And Chandler for Spargo, if Spargo doesn't come up. Of course, if Petracca doesn't play, I expect Melksham to keep his spot in the side.

     


    Melksham played 3-4 good games. His final was average but I don’t think you should drop a player on one game unless there is someone better to come. Which there isn’t in my view. In finals you need experienced big bodies so I wouldn’t consider a kid coming in or an underdone T Mac. Anyone suggesting Smith go and take a look at the Casey game last week. He was average at VFL level

    • Like 2
    3 minutes ago, DubDee said:

    Melksham played 3-4 good games. His final was average but I don’t think you should drop a player on one game unless there is someone better to come. Which there isn’t in my view. In finals you need experienced big bodies so I wouldn’t consider a kid coming in or an underdone T Mac. Anyone suggesting Smith go and take a look at the Casey game last week. He was average at VFL level

    He hurts our structure. He didn’t tackle. He did kick goals from marks. He feel over. We need a 2nd tall in. 

    • Like 1
    18 hours ago, Ugottobekidding said:

    Hard call. We really only have brown to replace milkshake. Tmac is underdone 

    That's  not right, we have Weideman  and Brown.

    • Haha 1
    3 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    He hurts our structure. He didn’t tackle. He did kick goals from marks. He feel over. We need a 2nd tall in. 

    He had a poor game. Still had more tackles than Pickett and the same as Spargo

    2 weeks ago he kicked 4.2 and took 4 contested marks. We don’t have anyone at Casey that can do that

    1 hour ago, bobby1554 said:

    Yes, Smith hasn’t been mentioned much in this discussion, but he was the medi sub on Friday. If another marking forward comes in, then it could, probably should, be Smith

    My opinion is Smith was sub for his versatility. His final for Casey was poor, especially his kicking. He has little form so I would doubt he plays unless forced through injury


    I’m predicting no change. Goody will have convinced himself we’ll be able to repeat the Gabba performance without changes.

    As for those saying ANB, Salem or Spargo should be dropped it will NEVER happen.

    The past four years have convinced me that they are Goody’s favourites.

    Match Committee have been out of form.

    Sydney beat us just like they did in Round 12.

    We need to move the ball quicker. The only way we're currently moving the ball quick onto our forward 50 is when we win the ball out the front of a centre bounce.

    So we need speed that can run and carry  and/or by kicks that open the game up.

    Nibbler has to be under pressure. His current role appears  to be absorbing tackles inside 50 which is a tad niche. Bedford in for mine. Speed and more likely to score.

    Hunt and Rivers need to provide more run out of defence. Salem needs to lift and start making kicks that open the game up.

    Presume Tommy Mac in to support Brown who moves at time like in need of a zimmer frame. Didnt look 100 percent for Casey but should come in for Melksham. JVO should have been given a regular season debut in case needed in finals.

    Would still like more speed of ball movement. Bowey can hit targets that open game up. Smith super quick and versatile. Maybe for Sparrow.

     

     

     

    • Like 1
     
    1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Any update on Spargo's and Fritsch's injuries?

    lever-backs-star-teammate-to-push-through-and-face-lions

    Answers to above question:  Lever played down fitness concerns over Charlie Spargo, who spent Friday night in hospital after a hit to the throat, and Bayley Fritsch, who played through a knee issue.  Both players were only walking laps on Monday morning, with Fritsch's left knee strapped.

    Other fitness news:

    • Lever was on a modified program and trained inside instead of with the main group, but Melbourne officials said he would be fit to face Brisbane.
    • Petracca completed a light session with his teammates at Gosch's Paddock on Monday morning, albeit with a slight limp and with tape around his right calf.  Lever:  "I think he'll have a bit of a lighter week. But he'd have to tick off a fair few things".
    • The defender was confident forward Tom McDonald could make an impact if called on, despite having just one VFL game to his name after a long-term foot injury.
    • Melksham also had a knee issue.

    Add those to BB and Jackson's bandaged knees, Oliver's thumb and Max looking so so we seem to be a team of the 'walking wounded'.

    Edited by Lucifers Hero

    • Like 5

    I fear Goody/match committee has become wedded to current approach/structure but I’ve wanted to see this for months:

    - JVR in for Melk;

    - Bowey in for whoever;

    - Brayshaw to defensive wing; and

    - Max as starting ruck (always), and playing more ‘kick behind play’ than up forward.

    None of this is likely to happen, however, as we’ll probably go with what worked in R23.

    • Like 5

    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • CASEY: Collingwood

      It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
      The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
      Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Like
      • 216 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Haha
        • Like
      • 528 replies
      Demonland
    View All