Jump to content

Farewell Brodie Grundy

Ouch!
Ouch!
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, Boots and all said:

...or having one of our forwards ruck and having Gawn and/or Grundy marking outside 50 for repeat entries.

Somehow I don't think the plan is each of them plays 50% game time and they're never on the ground at the same time..

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    Grundy when fit is a very good ruckman, and he's a better kick than Gawn. Going for players like this will only solidify our chances even more for premierships in years to come.  Our forward line will be fine. TMAC back and Van Rooyen will get games in next season. 

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    At least if we get Grundy that will give us choice of either forward pocket to bomb it long too.

     

    You know, make us unpredictable.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 9
     
    2 hours ago, Steve13 said:

    Everyone assumes that a 2nd ruck must play fwd. we looked significantly better last year with Gawn behind the ball. Just a thought on how 2AA quality rucks could work. 

    I just can’t agree that is where footy is going. We have an amazing group of tall defenders and we want one of our ruckmen to sit with them? And where is the extra number coming from? The forward line. So that is then us playing a man short up front.

    I want to embrace this, I just don’t see the benefit outside of Gawn insurance, and I think that is such a pathetic way to spend some of the draft capital we get from the LJ trade.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    Maybe Max isn't up to being the 1st ruck over the next few years. Some media mentioned he's been playing with groin issues the last 10 weeks. Maybe match committee are thinking they have to re invent Max. 31yo, knee issues, 209cm, 111kgs

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    14 minutes ago, rpfc said:

    I just can’t agree that is where footy is going. We have an amazing group of tall defenders and we want one of our ruckmen to sit with them? And where is the extra number coming from? The forward line. So that is then us playing a man short up front.

    I want to embrace this, I just don’t see the benefit outside of Gawn insurance, and I think that is such a pathetic way to spend some of the draft capital we get from the LJ trade.

    It’s more about the salary cap space and the fit when both are on the field IMO than the draft picks.

    There’s no way Gawn or Grundy play in a 7 man defence. That would mean completely giving up on a forward half game.  

  • Quote
    30 minutes ago, Winter Dan said:

    Doubles our kick out options. Tough ask for opp to nulify both Gawn and Grundy targets. 

    Spoiling a mark is very easy when you know where the ball is going. No way Grundy and Gawn will be offering alternative targets.

    Did you see it with Gawn and Jackson for example

  • Quote
    • Like 3
     
    7 hours ago, Winter Dan said:

    Doubles our kick out options. Tough ask for opp to nulify both Gawn and Grundy targets. 

     

    6 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

    Spoiling a mark is very easy when you know where the ball is going. No way Grundy and Gawn will be offering alternative targets.

    Did you see it with Gawn and Jackson for example

    Yes, they will be in the same flooded pack area to try to overwhelm in the air.

    Getting excited that our Forward Pocket  (which is where a 2nd ruck spends most their time) will be competing for kick outs is baffling to me.

    If they do this, they only way it makes sense is if we now consider Gawn more of a forward than ruck. Unprecedented surely for a AA ruck to be shunted off to the forward line. And he is a terrible shot for goal. 

    I don’t understand this I’m sorry and certainly not for the mooted $700k and laughable first round pick.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    On 8/10/2022 at 11:39 AM, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

    I see it more as him doing most of the ruck whilst Gawn spend more time forward

    Yes and Gawn has the capacity to kick lots of goals?

  • Quote
    On 8/11/2022 at 10:03 AM, dazzledavey36 said:

    I'm also confused by Goodwins presser yesterday.

    He stated that they have been really happy with Gawns progress in the forward line and could see this as something that could be used more often down the track.

    Checks notes and see that Gawn hasn't kicked a goal since round 12 against Sydney...

    Goody is a funny bugger. ...

    No he just looks dumb!

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1
    8 hours ago, Mincho Mania said:

    Maybe Max isn't up to being the 1st ruck over the next few years. Some media mentioned he's been playing with groin issues the last 10 weeks. Maybe match committee are thinking they have to re invent Max. 31yo, knee issues, 209cm, 111kgs

    Yeah, maybe this is the issue. Unfortunately, Brodie seems to have similar issues. Ultimately we all end up speculating with imperfect information in these matters.

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    10 hours ago, Mincho Mania said:

    Maybe Max isn't up to being the 1st ruck over the next few years. Some media mentioned he's been playing with groin issues the last 10 weeks. Maybe match committee are thinking they have to re invent Max. 31yo, knee issues, 209cm, 111kgs

    Agree. I can see the arguments for and against getting Grundy, but the FD seems committed to getting him and the most likely explanation is that Max is more banged up than we'd like.

    I think the Jackson trade could drag on while Freo try to negotiate their other deals to set it up. I wouldn't mind getting the Grundy deal done early for our future first with Collingwood paying a 30% of Grundy's salary. 

    Then we can concentrate on some other deals like trading up for Brisbane's first.

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    14 hours ago, Steve13 said:

    Everyone assumes that a 2nd ruck must play fwd. we looked significantly better last year with Gawn behind the ball. Just a thought on how 2AA quality rucks could work. 

    This is about the best post on this thread.

    Max behind the ball frees up May, Lever and Petty significantly and brings their intercept into the game, as teams will need to avoid Max at all costs.

    It could also mean we could afford to shift Petty forward and play Turner in his place.

    If Grundy is fit, it could be a master stroke.

    Edited by A F

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    Not sure about Max (or Grundy) behind the ball. 

    I think that belongs in the 'it was a 2021 tactic' basket.  It worked in the first part of this year but when we played Geelong they did everything but kick it high into f50 or anywhere near where Max was. 

    Other teams have followed that with varying degrees of success.  Not sure Max behind the ball is the same weapon in future that it was in 2021.

    The new mantra to play against Melbourne:  keep the ball low into f50 where Melb struggle to defend.  Every team will try that tactic in 2023 so fixing that part of our defensive game will be a key for 2023 success.

    Edited by Lucifers Hero

  • Quote
    • Like 7
    5 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Not sure about Max (or Grundy) behind the ball. 

    I think that belongs in the 'it was a 2021 tactic' basket.  It worked in the first part of this year but when we played Geelong they did everything but kick it high into f50 or anywhere near where Max was. 

    Other teams have followed that with varying degrees of success.  Not sure Max behind the ball is the same weapon going forward that it was in 2021.

    The new adage to play against Melbourne:  keep the ball low into f50 where Melb struggle to defend.  Every team will try that tactic in 2023 so fixing that part of our defensive game will be a key for 2023 success.

    we were much better when ball came in low with Bowza playing as his positioning was so good. Still can't understand why he didn't play finals - was BOG for Casey.

    Edited by chook fowler

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Love 1
    1 hour ago, old55 said:

    Agree. I can see the arguments for and against getting Grundy, but the FD seems committed to getting him and the most likely explanation is that Max is more banged up than we'd like.

    I think the Jackson trade could drag on while Freo try to negotiate their other deals to set it up. I wouldn't mind getting the Grundy deal done early for our future first with Collingwood paying a 30% of Grundy's salary. 

    Then we can concentrate on some other deals like trading up for Brisbane's first.

    Yeah, it has to be the Max is nearly done. Such a shame. 

    Now we have to try and fashion a forward line with Gawn in the square. BBB can’t play with that then. We will have to stop flooding back ANB and Spargo (or the people who play their roles) so deep as Gawn can’t be up that high and run back into space. I would actually prefer to not flood so far back from the forward line so that I will like. I hope it means more leading at the footy from JVR and Fritsch INSIDE the 50.

  • Quote

    Gotta feel for Grundy, signed a long term deal and doesn't want to leave his club.  The Pies are looking after their stars on long term deals as usual!  they are not worth the paper they are written on

    Grundy will have to wait until the LJ trade gets done which will last until the last couple of days of the trade period.  So he will not know where he is playing for weeks and weeks

  • Quote
    5 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

    we were much better when ball came in low with Bowza playing as his positioning was so good. Still can't understand why he didn't play finals - was BOG for Casey.

    My theory on Bowey is he, understandably, ran our of puff and couldn't hold his ground against bigger bodies.  Geelong rag-dolled him.  He was dropped the next week. 

    If my hunch is correct he will be bulked up a bit over the preseason.

    I expect to see a bigger, stronger, better Bowey next year.

    Edited by Lucifers Hero

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    The set up of our defence will be just as interesting as our fwd line next season in my opinion. The elephant in the room might be Jake Lever if teams continue to play against us as they did, his season while interrupted was pretty poor, not a player in the competition relies more on the team playing the way Melbourne do and holding the opposition up. We didnt do that last half of the season.. he was rendered useless at times. 

    In saying that,  i still think Grundy will be a good addition.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, old55 said:

    Agree. I can see the arguments for and against getting Grundy, but the FD seems committed to getting him and the most likely explanation is that Max is more banged up than we'd like.

    I think the Jackson trade could drag on while Freo try to negotiate their other deals to set it up. I wouldn't mind getting the Grundy deal done early for our future first with Collingwood paying a 30% of Grundy's salary. 

    Then we can concentrate on some other deals like trading up for Brisbane's first.

    I think you're right - and maybe Max also wants to prolong his career and playing with another ruckman is the only way.  With Trac and Clarry signing long term deals he prob wants to stay in the team as long as he can.

    Re the strategy though, while it makes sense, isn't this making it a little easy for the pies.  They are a rival next year (not to mention beating us twice this year).  Grundy has barely played for them - is not in their finals side or the sides that beat us twice.  By paying 70% of Grundy's salary and locking that in, it allows them to go after players that will plug holes in a side that has already overtaken us.  Geelong and Port are (reportedly) out of the race for Grundy and the pies want to move him on to sign De Goey and bring in McStay/Hill and whoever else they're chasing.  What's the rush?  If the cap is so tight for them then we hold all the leverage.

    Having said that, I feel like this is already a done deal with most of the details nutted out - it's just a matter of waiting for the pies season to finish / trade period to start to announce.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
    18 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

    we were much better when ball came in low with Bowza playing as his positioning was so good. Still can't understand why he didn't play finals - was BOG for Casey.

    Because Salem and others were 'untouchable'. One of the worst things this season was our coaching staff seemingly rewarding players down on form or hampered with injuries based on their 2021 output.

  • Quote
    • Like 8
     
    20 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Not sure about Max (or Grundy) behind the ball. 

    I think that belongs in the 'it was a 2021 tactic' basket.  It worked in the first part of this year but when we played Geelong they did everything but kick it high into f50 or anywhere near where Max was. 

    Other teams have followed that with varying degrees of success.  Not sure Max behind the ball is the same weapon in future that it was in 2021.

    The new mantra to play against Melbourne:  keep the ball low into f50 where Melb struggle to defend.  Every team will try that tactic in 2023 so fixing that part of our defensive game will be a key for 2023 success.

    I know that you're talking about this like it's a bad thing but I see it as the opposite. 

    We are forcing teams that are used to playing a particular way, to play a way that's different to how they want to play. If we are forcing Geelong to kick the ball away from Hawkins and Cameron then that's a win. It also means that we are forcing shallower entries and slower entries, which helps us to counterattack more easily. 

    What Max allows us to do is to troubleshoot. If we are dominating the defensive aerial contest or struggling up forward then we can swing him forward, and vice versa. Max has gravity - wherever he goes the opposition's focus will follow. By bringing in a big ruckman to bully the ruck contest it allows us to use Max to exploit his league leading asset .... his contested marking ability. 

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    9 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said:

    I know that you're talking about this like it's a bad thing but I see it as the opposite. 

    We are forcing teams that are used to playing a particular way, to play a way that's different to how they want to play. If we are forcing Geelong to kick the ball away from Hawkins and Cameron then that's a win. It also means that we are forcing shallower entries and slower entries, which helps us to counterattack more easily. 

    What Max allows us to do is to troubleshoot. If we are dominating the defensive aerial contest or struggling up forward then we can swing him forward, and vice versa. Max has gravity - wherever he goes the opposition's focus will follow. By bringing in a big ruckman to bully the ruck contest it allows us to use Max to exploit his league leading asset .... his contested marking ability. 

    I didn't see much evidence of us counter attacking from the back half. I haven't got the stats in front of me, but I recall seeing that our scores from defensive rebounds was pretty low.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie? 
      Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG. Unfortunately, performances like these went against the grain of what Melbourne has been producing from virtually midway through 2024 and extending right through to the present day. This is a game between two clubs who have faltered over the past couple of years because their disposal efficiency is appalling. Neither of them can hit the side of a barn door but history tells us that every once in a while such teams have their lucky days or come up against an opponent in even worse shape and hence, one of them will come up trumps in this match.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Like
      • 242 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 16 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Shocked
        • Like
      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All