Jump to content

Featured Replies

20 hours ago, Maldonboy38 said:

I actually think he is a very good coach. The players love him, his leaders play for him, and the young players are devoted to him in a way Clarry, Trac and Brayshaw are to Goodwin at the Dees. His record is very good, but their striving for success has a very hard outer limit, especially in 2 ways:

Game style. The chip and charge, incremental "game of inches" requires a skill set that the Cats under Mark Thompson might have got away with (amazing skills those teams). But even those cats of 07 09 and 11 did not chip and charge, they flung it around with breathtakingly quick handballs and kicks. The chip and charge method comes unstuck under fierce pressure and clearly struggles in the finals campaigns.

List management/recruiting. If bringing in elite older talent to support your list is not your main strategy, it can work. Hawks 2013 - 2015, Dees 2021. But if it dominates your strategy and costs you young draft picks, and even the young talent you do get are starved of opportunity, it is a dream killer. Higgins was a recent terrible decision, and even now they have decided to keep Gary Rohan. Bewildering. 


How about culture?

I always found it interesting to hear it lauded externally. 

 

Just a reminder that we played them for 6 hours this year. They were better than us for a whopping 10 minutes. 

On 10/10/2021 at 8:21 AM, Cassiew said:

https://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/380365/by-the-numbers-pies-and-cats
 

1999. The last time they had to play down there. Really? Why do they get this preferential treatment from the AFL? They’re the only team that doesn’t have to wear an alternative strip (changing the position of logos is not alternate.) I can’t remember the last time we didn’t play Geelong in Geelong. So even during their post premiership years they didn’t have to give Geelong a home game. Totally unfair 

Gate receipts pure and simple. 

Geelong makes roughly the same money at Kardinia Park with 30k as it does with 60k at the MCG

Traditionally only Collingwood, Essendon, Richmond and in the past Hawthorn deliver that 60k plus number.

Come 2022 I would not be surprised if we swap with Hawthorn in the Geelong roadtrip.

 
On 10/9/2021 at 8:19 PM, BoBo said:

It’s conceivable that by the end of Scott’s 3 years, Geelong will have no:

Hawkins

Selwood

Danger

Stanley

Smith

Thouy

Blicsavs (will be 34)

Rohan (will be 33)

Duncan (will be 33)

Menegola (will be 33)


Besides Stanley and Rohan (allergic to finals)… these are superstars or just out and out guns.

Even Tom Stewart and Cameron will be 32 by the 2025 season. 
 

I don’t see how they’re not going to fall off a cliff.

Blicsavs, Rohan, Duncan & Menagola will be in their prime (by Geelong standards) with Stewart & Cameron joining the OAP's a year later. They are gone. AFL need to have some of the bigger clubs play down at "Kitty Litter" ground and by beating Geelong down there their home ground advantage in their heads will go. Down the cliff they go.


They’re gifted extra wins cos the 8 interstate clubs play there. Then cellardwellers - North, us (before times) and can pinch a 50-50 win against top clubs on neutral MCG or Etihad. 
They played in Tas first time this year since 2005 - Covid relocation. 
Swans actually haven’t lost there since 2015 

13 hours ago, MT64 said:

Blicsavs, Rohan, Duncan & Menagola will be in their prime (by Geelong standards) with Stewart & Cameron joining the OAP's a year later. They are gone. AFL need to have some of the bigger clubs play down at "Kitty Litter" ground and by beating Geelong down there their home ground advantage in their heads will go. Down the cliff they go.

Yup. 
 

Weird thing about Scott’s signing is it’s almost guaranteed that season 2024 (Scott’s last year) they’re going to be on the cusp of a total list rebuild. They’ve boxed themselves in for having a tilt next year, which is just, not going to happen. Even if we weren’t as good as we are, I reckon the doggies would have smashed them in a granny this year. They are easily a level above Geelong. 

 
On 10/10/2021 at 11:22 AM, Ethan Tremblay said:

To be fair, he does do a good job of getting the best out of his list. 

This.


Jeelong win at Jeelong because they have good players, and they generally play well on a soccer field against weak opposition. Has always been thus and don't worry, the worm will turn. 

Does anyone know the longest coaching streak at a club without a flag (even if they previously coached one)?  Surely by 2024 Scott, at 13 seasons, would be close. Right now at 10 years has there ever been a coach that lasted that long. 

A few that come to mind:

1. Mick Malthouse went 10 seasons at Collingwood.

2. Neale Daniher - the longest in our drought at 9 full seasons.

3. Rodney Eade - 7 years.

4. Ross Lyon - 7 years at Freo

 

2 hours ago, Watson11 said:

Does anyone know the longest coaching streak at a club without a flag (even if they previously coached one)?  Surely by 2024 Scott, at 13 seasons, would be close. Right now at 10 years has there ever been a coach that lasted that long. 

A few that come to mind:

1. Mick Malthouse went 10 seasons at Collingwood.

2. Neale Daniher - the longest in our drought at 9 full seasons.

3. Rodney Eade - 7 years.

4. Ross Lyon - 7 years at Freo

 

Dont know if this is the longest but Jock McHale coached the 1936 premiers and retired at the end of 1949 season.

Geelong are showing zero interest in their team's mid-long term success. The board, FD and coaches are belligerently determined to get a flag out of their old heroes to the detriment of the whole club!  I've never seen a club do this to this extent, maybe the Saints of 2011-12 but you could kind of understand this given their flag drought.

Scott's pride and arrogance is going to leave the Cats on their knees for a decade.  These days you cannot build a list via trade, just look at the players available this year.

The irony is, if they have of used a few high draft picks over the past 5-6 years rather than trading for Dahlhaus/Higgins etc they would have a much better chance of winning a flag in 2022.


5 hours ago, hemingway said:

God help Geelong. 

Will end badly. 

Please, God, don't.    Their arrogance deserves the proper reward, preferably by the Demon, if not the Devil.

5 hours ago, hemingway said:

God help Geelong. 

 

36 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Please, God, don't.    Their arrogance deserves the proper reward, preferably by the Demon, if not the Devil.

 

Yeah, no pulling strings. Let them [censored] it up all by themselves.

Their home ground advantage is probably going to prevent them from totally bottoming out and getting their hands on very early picks.  It's also a disadvantage because it's so different from everywhere else it's more difficult to play a universal game style. It's a bit strange that the Cats have gone for a possession based game on the sardine can anyway - it would be harder to execute there - maybe that's the method in Scott's madness ...

57 minutes ago, old55 said:

Their home ground advantage is probably going to prevent them from totally bottoming out and getting their hands on very early picks.

Does anyone who follow other sports and leagues around the world have another team where there is a similar scenario going on?

Or are we here in the AFL (and I suspect we are) the only league whereby not all teams play each other twice, and/or multiple teams share one home ground as well as other ground inequities?


it's frightening to think the cat's average age will actually increase next year. must be some sort of record

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 39 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 257 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies