Jump to content

Featured Replies

Deserved another chance. He’s taken his bad year on the chin and ready to move on to right things. If delisted I’m sure some another club would have picked him up cheaply and got a bargain. 

Edited by John Crow Batty

 

Strange. 

Ben Brown signed for four years with us and TMac extended his deal for 2 more. There’s our key forwards set for two years (unless one loses form).

I can’t see him getting a game in the back line (especially with Tomlinson coming back).

Dogga has back up ruck nailed down.

Are there moves going on behind the scenes regarding other players we don’t know about? All the credit in the world to the kid to back himself to get back into the starting 22, but a little bit more clarity to the logic of the move besides the typical guff about ‘loving the club’ would be nice.

Edited by Colin B. Flaubert

 
2 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Credit to him, hasn’t had the year he hoped for but I don’t think even our most optimistic supporters would have anticipated the year we have had.

 

I think his unfortunate timing with the injury was the only thing that stopped him being a big contributor this year. 
 

As others have mentioned, there is no chance we remain injury free again in 2022, this year has been extraordinary on that front. He will get chances, let’s hope he grabs them and our three KPF’s push each other to continue on in 2022


Wasn't far off.
Missed a few shots which opened the door.
Could see in his face he knew he was letting his chance slip to Brown.
If Brown or Tmac drop off for whatever reason Weid will be there play his role.
Obviously loves the environment if he's willing to take a pay cut rather than chase more coin elsewhere.

 

Edited by Fork 'em

56 minutes ago, Colin B. Flaubert said:

Strange. 

Ben Brown signed for four years with us and TMac extended his deal for 2 more. There’s our key forwards set for two years (unless one loses form).

I can’t see him getting a game in the back line (especially with Tomlinson coming back).

Dogga has back up ruck nailed down.

Are there moves going on behind the scenes regarding other players we don’t know about? All the credit in the world to the kid to back himself to get back into the starting 22, but a little bit more clarity to the logic of the move besides the typical guff about ‘loving the club’ would be nice.

He is there to cover injuries or form slumps. Him being there puts pressure on Brown and Tmac to perform or they lose their spot. This is a good thing for the club. 

 
9 hours ago, Pollyanna said:

Schache playing in the GF and Marshall played last week in the PF, but no interest in Weid - world has gone crazy ....

12 months ago we couldn’t give TMac or ANB away and we picked up Ben Brown from the $2 bin. The footy world has no imagination. If the stock market was as volatile as football player value, the world would go in to a GFC every other day.

@Colin B. FlaubertFrom the sounds of it the good options were drying up so it was down to him throwing himself into the DFA market place or going for a bit of certainty and back himself to force his way in. For us, it gives us coverage and the knowledge that if one of Tommy or BBB have a form slump we can have Sam breathing down their necks to take their spot. If he’s signed on for a lower wage as well then it’s low risk. There’s been far worse than Sam we’ve kept on the list. 

Edited by Pates


Thanks Sam Weideman for choosing the mighty Demons going forward. Good luck Sam, shows what team first means.!!❤️💙

31 minutes ago, Nasher said:

12 months ago we couldn’t give TMac or ANB away and we picked up Ben Brown from the $2 bin. The footy world has no imagination. If the stock market was as volatile as football player value, the world would go in to a GFC every other day.

$2 bin.  Isn't he on $400k+?

10 hours ago, Deeko2 said:

The best thing that could have happened to Schache was give him a run behind the ball to get him some easy pill and a bit of confidence up.  I often wonder why we have never given Sam some development as a defender.

Schache went ok in defence and someone like Liam Jones has found his niche back there so I see no reason why Sam couldn't become a roll player here.  

It's clearly a tough gig getting the ball bombed on your head and continually getting out numbered as a forward.  Weitering tried up forward and looked ordinary, Moore has had his moments good and bad, Harris-Andrews gets lost up there.

So maybe going back and being one of those extra numbers would assist him.  Plus if he's not confident in the jukes he can just go the almighty fist.  I struggle to believe there are a lot of key defenders in the comp with more talent than Sam. 

I'd like to see the club developing this side of his game as well. 

 

Hard to see the powers-that-be disrupting a very solid defensive unit by “experimenting” with Sam as a defender, especially if Tomlinson is fit and ready at the start of preseason.   
 

I feel that Sam needs to continue to work on his marking confidence, which was good prior to 2019.  Something went wrong: was it just mental, just physical or a combination?  I trust our club to help him through this. 

9 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Petty and Smith would be good options up forward. 

Petty has in my mind secured his place this year,to the surprise of many, in our defensive unit, and is heir apparent to Steve May as FB.  
 

Smith, if he ever regains and retains physical fitness, could be a Jack of all trades. 

On 9/14/2021 at 7:29 PM, rpfc said:

I’m sure there is interest but perhaps not at the terms desired. He should stay for two years and reach FA and give himself a chance to push out TMac or BBB.

image.gif.03f8d31155e963b366a73c9681d2323f.gif


1 hour ago, Jontee said:

$2 bin.  Isn't he on $400k+?

The cheapest possible AFL player is on 75k. 

Sensible list management. Who know how much longer McDonald amd Brown have as contributors. A two year deal is good for both parties.

Good work Sam. No need to rush his development or make him feel under pressure now that we have Ben Brown. It’s a smart move.

30 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Good work Sam. No need to rush his development or make him feel under pressure now that we have Ben Brown. It’s a smart move.

I think he'll playa lot of senior footy next year. Remember Tom was going to play wing so maybe next yr he does and Weed plays CHF.

1 hour ago, cantstandyasam said:

I think he'll playa lot of senior footy next year. Remember Tom was going to play wing so maybe next yr he does and Weed plays CHF.

TMc on wing?  In lieu of Brayshaw or Langdon?  🙄

I would be surprised.  


3 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Good work Sam. No need to rush his development or make him feel under pressure now that we have Ben Brown. It’s a smart move.

Is Sam ready yet 

A7B4CF68-6EE7-4535-BA44-3894B8169EC3.jpeg

Absolutely stoked with this. 

 

Good interview. He’s not happy with where he’s at but he wants to fight it out and be part of our success. Good for him. He has a good head on his shoulders and I’m confident he can play a role in this team. 

Good luck to TMac and BBB during the off-season. Weid is going to come hard. Really great interview and just seems so angry about what he hasn't achieved. We say this every year, but maybe next year is the one. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies