Jump to content

Mac Andrew

Whispering_Jack
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

15 minutes ago, Freddy Fuschia said:

Don’t completely underestimate Daw as your 3rd tier ruckman. If he wants the role, there’s nothing wrong with someone like him and then to rookie a development tall. 

no, but he's fourth cab off the rank

  • Quote
    •  
    2 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

    no, but he's fourth cab off the rank

    That might well be so but just a reminder that Melbourne’s first draft pick at the moment is in the 30s. Even if we trade up, where do the club’s priorities lie in November. A development ruckman?

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1
    3 hours ago, Neitz the Great said:

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but trust me. It will happen. 

    Clubs and media all over him - Luke Jackson ruckman type- esque

    He hasn’t got the body he will break in half project player Jackson was ready to go

  • Quote
    •  

    Other people clearly follow this much closer than me - but from what I've seen and heard he's only shown glimpses of potential.

    Players like Grundy and Jackson showed a lot more at the same age.  Maybe not his fault as he is so lightly built at the moment.

    But it's rare of clubs to draft so highly solely on potential.  If he's 3-4 years away, which clubs are going to use their first round pick on him - it's such a risk and clubs / recruiting managers are held to account for these decisions when they don't come off.  (You don't want to be the guy that picks a Luke Molan or Lucas Cook in the first round)

    Put it this way - If we had a pick in the first round, I'd be concerned if we were looking to use it on this kid unless he showed a bit more in the second half of the year.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    9 hours ago, Redleg said:

    Is he as good as Grundy, who was ready to go and went 18?

    Anyway if he comes to us great and if he doesn’t, so be it. 

    Geelong will come from behind, in the 'dark, out-of-picture nowhereland', and snatch him above all other clubs. 

  • Quote

    8 hours ago, Freddy Fuschia said:

    That might well be so but just a reminder that Melbourne’s first draft pick at the moment is in the 30s. Even if we trade up, where do the club’s priorities lie in November. A development ruckman?

    We have done really well over the last two years in recruiting younger players with talent and great potential. Just like fruit on the vine, allow these future Demons the chance to ripen over time ... recruiting one ruckman just is not the sole outcome of our development or onfield success. 

    Edited by Deemania since 56

  • Quote
    6 minutes ago, Deemania since 56 said:

    Geelong will come from behind, in the 'dark, out-of-picture nowhereland', and snatch him above all other clubs. 

    Currently, Geelong’s first pick is 27,

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Can someone explain how much effort and resources we actually put in to our NGA? A lot of posters saying it's not worth it; is it really as simple as 'You fit the rules, come train during summer' or is there more to it than that?

    @dazzledavey36may have some idea. Just working out if I'm going to be outraged just because they've changed the rules or genuinely outraged.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
     

    sounds like mac andrew will be a top 10 pick at this stage

    https://www.afl.com.au/news/647954/twomey-s-draft-team-of-the-year-merrett-2-0-athletic-ruck-enter-top-10-talks

    Mac Andrew's performance for Vic Country in last week's under-19 clash with Vic Metro was particularly eye-catching and sees the athletic ruckman/forward come back into the team of the year after missing several weeks through concussion.

    Andrew has elevated himself into being a likely top-10 selection, meaning Melbourne would be unable to match a bid on the Next Generation Academy prospect.

  • Quote

    Brilliant. Rule changes working wonders for us ?

    Meanwhile other clubs benefits with multiple first round picks for bugger all cost. Such a broken system and frustrating that it starts getting corrected right when we’d finally benefit!

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    On 7/14/2021 at 5:53 AM, Blistering said:

    Currently, Geelong’s first pick is 27,

    Irrelevant due to their upstart demands being regularly met by the AFL, and ability to offer top dollar to the player as a nurturant incentive.

  • Quote
    7 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

    Brilliant. Rule changes working wonders for us ?

    Meanwhile other clubs benefits with multiple first round picks for bugger all cost. Such a broken system and frustrating that it starts getting corrected right when we’d finally benefit!

    Exactly, why not phase it out over a 3 year period beginning from last year, and allow each club to select one player in that 3 year window under the old rules - and everyone else under the new rules? Cutting it off completely just means some clubs got a massive leg up, and others didn’t. A phased approach allows for consistency.

  • Quote
    3 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

    Exactly, why not phase it out over a 3 year period beginning from last year, and allow each club to select one player in that 3 year window under the old rules - and everyone else under the new rules? Cutting it off completely just means some clubs got a massive leg up, and others didn’t. A phased approach allows for consistency.

    And the AFL would not know consistency if they fell over it - explains the way it has been changed.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    I don't think he will be a top 10 selection. Too much risk. 14-22 by my observations.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    i still reckon it will be a brave club who uses a first round pick on a player probably requiring long development

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    It's an interesting one, if we weren't eligible for Mac Andrew would we still be urging for a Phased Out approach of a system that wasn't really fair to begin with?

    Hoping he sneaks through, would like to benefit from a rule that has helped other clubs but if it doesn't what can you do. 

  • Quote
    On 7/14/2021 at 6:16 AM, Deemania since 56 said:

    Geelong will come from behind, in the 'dark, out-of-picture nowhereland', and snatch him above all other clubs. 

    He is too young for them

  • Quote
    • Haha 2
    On 7/14/2021 at 7:08 AM, Mickey said:

    Can someone explain how much effort and resources we actually put in to our NGA? A lot of posters saying it's not worth it; is it really as simple as 'You fit the rules, come train during summer' or is there more to it than that?

    @dazzledavey36may have some idea. Just working out if I'm going to be outraged just because they've changed the rules or genuinely outraged.

    We've probably had Mac since he was 14-15 in our junior academy system.

    Last year he trained a couple of times with the club in the off season, as did all our other current academy players like Kobi George and  Ryan Koo Kwet Kim from Dandenong Stringrays. 

    Unfortunately due to the new rule change,  we are about to lose a gun player that we've helped support and provide great training resources since 15 years of age to a click of a finger.

    Go figure.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    1 hour ago, The heart beats true said:

    Exactly, why not phase it out over a 3 year period beginning from last year, and allow each club to select one player in that 3 year window under the old rules - and everyone else under the new rules? Cutting it off completely just means some clubs got a massive leg up, and others didn’t. A phased approach allows for consistency.

    To be fair to the AFL I believe it is being phased. It was no change last year, top 20 picks this year and top 40 picks next year.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Lord Travis said:

    Brilliant. Rule changes working wonders for us ?

    Meanwhile other clubs benefits with multiple first round picks for bugger all cost. Such a broken system and frustrating that it starts getting corrected right when we’d finally benefit!

    MFCSS has to exist for a reason and there is another one.

    Just typical.

    I still hold hope that he won't go top 20.  I can't see a very tall, skinny kid like that ( 70 kgs ), playing for a couple of years.  There are other kids in the  draft possibly ready to go in the AFL and several clubs may not have the need for a developing ruckman.

    Can you imagine explaining to your members that you took a kid top 20, that might need 2-3 years before he is ready to play.That is usually the late picks and rookie picks for that type of player.

  • Quote

    16 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

    We've probably had Mac since he was 14-15 in our junior academy system.

    Last year he trained a couple of times with the club in the off season, as did all our other current academy players like Kobi George and  Ryan Koo Kwet Kim from Dandenong Stringrays. 

    Unfortunately due to the new rule change,  we are about to lose a gun player that we've helped support and provide great training resources since 15 years of age to a click of a finger.

    Go figure.

    I am confident the rule wouldn't have changed if the NGA player was tied to the Cats or Saints.

    Edited by Redleg

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    8 minutes ago, Grimes Times said:

    To be fair to the AFL I believe it is being phased. It was no change last year, top 20 picks this year and top 40 picks next year.

    Well, if we thought Mac was a real talent, I hope we lobbied to exclude players that maybe clubs had already put years into, spending considerable time and resources.

    I haven't seen any other player mentioned this year, as an NGA player going top 20, that would affect another club.

    Great then that it comes into play, after other clubs have reaped the benefit.

  • Quote
    22 minutes ago, Grimes Times said:

    To be fair to the AFL I believe it is being phased. It was no change last year, top 20 picks this year and top 40 picks next year.

    Oh well in that case, congrats to the AFL for creating the perception of a fair rule change, while still managing to screw over Melbourne in the process. ?

  • Quote
    • Vomit 1
     
    14 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

    Oh well in that case, congrats to the AFL for creating the perception of a fair rule change, while still managing to screw over Melbourne in the process. ?

    And in that sense, the AFL has always shown consistency.

  • Quote
    • Haha 1

    NGA system had massive issues from the start, it was only brought in to shut up Eddie and Co.  No idea on this kid, raw with potential from what you read some will have him top 20 others from 20-40 range.

    The club really needs to spend time developing potential Father Son/Daughters, there is no incentive to have a NGA with the new rules unless you are a club in NSW and QLD

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • 185 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Haha
        • Like
      • 47 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

      After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

        • Haha
        • Like
      • 330 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: St. Kilda

      Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

        • Like
      • 31 replies
      Demonland
    View All