Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted

One thing in our favour for Mac Andres is that clubs are unlikely to use a top 20 pick on a pure ruckman who probably won't play for a few years.  We used pick 3 on Jackson but he is seen as ruck/forward/tall midfielder.

I don't think 'the top 20' cutoff for NGA players is adjusted for Northern Academy and F/S players taken in the first round so that would help him slide to outside the top 20. 

In the AFL article:  "During the upcoming recess of the NAB League competition Melbourne is expected to increase its work with Andrew, including the potential of him featuring for their VFL side Casey Demons".  early-season-blitz-puts-ruckman-on-demons-nga-radar

Good to see he gets an early start start with us.  That is partly why Sydney Academy players are ready to play in their early years.

  • Like 1

Posted
2 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

That is partly why Sydney Academy players are ready to play in their early years.

they start the sydney academy at 12 years old to capture them as early as possible

they grow up learning the skillset to set them up for success at afl level


Posted
1 hour ago, whatwhat say what said:

if he goes top 20 we can't claim him

being a ruckman, skinny and requiring development he is unlikely to go top 20 judging on precedents. fortunately

  • Like 8
Posted

Andrew looks an exciting prospect - it's great to see talented Sudo kids moving through the ranks.  

  • Like 8

Posted

I’d be interested to see how much involvement Melbourne had in his development, probably not a great deal, so can’t really complain if he can’t be picked up on the cheap.

I have involvement on the committee of my kids’ local footy team and got an email (paraphrasing).

”Hi, I’m with St.Kilda’s NGA. Do you have any registered players that fit this criteria?” and our club isn’t even in St. Kilda’s NGA catchment zone.

Looks like they just sweep up kids already registered at junior footy and trial them for a development squad - that doesn’t seem to be encouraging new players given thy are trying to pick the eyes out of kids who had already decided to play footy.

Maybe the clubs are doing more and I haven’t seen it, but my club is in Collingwood’s NGA zone and we have a very high Asian demographic and consequently do struggle to tap into those communities for players. We have not had any involvement or assistance from Collingwood or the AFL targeting those groups to get them interested in footy and have had no junior registrations due to NGA or AFL initiatives.

NGA really does appear to be a bit of a rort.

  • Like 3
  • Love 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Lampers said:

I’d be interested to see how much involvement Melbourne had in his development, probably not a great deal, so can’t really complain if he can’t be picked up on the cheap.

I have involvement on the committee of my kids’ local footy team and got an email (paraphrasing).

”Hi, I’m with St.Kilda’s NGA. Do you have any registered players that fit this criteria?” and our club isn’t even in St. Kilda’s NGA catchment zone.

Looks like they just sweep up kids already registered at junior footy and trial them for a development squad - that doesn’t seem to be encouraging new players given thy are trying to pick the eyes out of kids who had already decided to play footy.

Maybe the clubs are doing more and I haven’t seen it, but my club is in Collingwood’s NGA zone and we have a very high Asian demographic and consequently do struggle to tap into those communities for players. We have not had any involvement or assistance from Collingwood or the AFL targeting those groups to get them interested in footy and have had no junior registrations due to NGA or AFL initiatives.

NGA really does appear to be a bit of a rort.

I went to the border Albury/Wodonga a bit a few years back, basically every person I visited that had boys playing footy their kids very signed to GWS academy.

Clubs will sign anyone they get priority access to, sign 1000 and hope there is 1 they can get on the cheap.

On a side note do we still have our father/Daughter academy?

The Swans do a heap of development in their academy and are seeing massive rewards from this.  The Victorian/SA/WA have extremely limited priority access to Academy players whilst the northern states I believe still have priority access to anyone in their zone.

 

Posted

Interesting prospect.

Wonder what it may mean for Bradke's long term development plan if we can grab him. 

Also by the time he's ready for draft, Kalani White will also be 54124cm tall based off Jeff's recent IG post. 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Posted

Someone get in his ear and tell him to settle down a bit... can't go getting 20 kicks every week if he's gonna miss the first round.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

One thing in our favour for Mac Andres is that clubs are unlikely to use a top 20 pick on a pure ruckman who probably won't play for a few years.  We used pick 3 on Jackson but he is seen as ruck/forward/tall midfielder.

I don't think 'the top 20' cutoff for NGA players is adjusted for Northern Academy and F/S players taken in the first round so that would help him slide to outside the top 20. 

In the AFL article:  "During the upcoming recess of the NAB League competition Melbourne is expected to increase its work with Andrew, including the potential of him featuring for their VFL side Casey Demons".  early-season-blitz-puts-ruckman-on-demons-nga-radar

Good to see he gets an early start start with us.  That is partly why Sydney Academy players are ready to play in their early years.

So how does this work - if he doesn't go in the top 20, we just have to have enough points to cover wherever he is bid on?  And if no one bids we can take him with our last pick?


Posted
38 minutes ago, deelusions from afar said:

So how does this work - if he doesn't go in the top 20, we just have to have enough points to cover wherever he is bid on?  And if no one bids we can take him with our last pick?

and still get the 25% points discount (or is it 20%?)

Posted
1 hour ago, roy11 said:

Interesting prospect.

Wonder what it may mean for Bradke's long term development plan if we can grab him. 

Also by the time he's ready for draft, Kalani White will also be 54124cm tall based off Jeff's recent IG post. 

 

 

 

Hopefully delisted at years end.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

if he goes top 20 we can't claim him

Is that because our first pick is in round 2. I thought we only had to match the pick with our next available or match the points.


Posted
7 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

if he goes top 20 we can't claim him

just our luck really, fingers crossed he slips as the year goes on, couldn't come at a better time with Majak, TMac and MBrown all the wrong side of 30 or playing like they are anyways ?

Posted
44 minutes ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

Trust us the year we have an NGA who appears to be a serious specimen we won’t be able to take him if picked inside 20. Mac Andrew please be good, but not too good. 

Great avatar photo BRFE. Goddam it i wish i had thought of it before you.



Posted

Rucks rarely go first round.  Too much development before they can play at AFL level (doggo is the anomaly here...).  More midfielder or Kpp types go early.  So hopefully we can do a Deakin Smith with him....

Posted

Mac Andrew hasn't made the first draft board I’ve seen by twitter user @edpascoe_edps

IMG_3308.JPG

  • Thanks 1
  • Demonland changed the title to The Mac Andrew Thread
Posted
On 4/13/2021 at 10:59 PM, Turner said:

Mac Andrew hasn't made the first draft board I’ve seen by twitter user @edpascoe_edps

IMG_3308.JPG

It would be good to see him playing before coming to a view on where he might be drafted. As has already been pointed out, ruckmen rarely qualify at the pointy end of the draft unless they’re elite in that craft or have other strings to their bows (eg can also play key positions). Let’s see how his season pans out. 

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...