Jump to content

Featured Replies

Arr the old 426. The weid and brown have been that for a couple of weeks. Does that mean they should have been listed as 628 or did the second language pop  it's head up again. 

 
8 hours ago, DubDee said:

Injury list form yesterday

PLAYER  INJURY   ESTIMATED RETURN

 Angus Brayshaw        Foot Test

 Ben Brown                   Knee 4-6 weeks

 Michael Hibberd         Ankle TBC

 Marty Hore                  Knee Season

 Jay Lockhart              [censored] TBC

 Steven May                Chest Test

 Jake Melksham         Hamstring Test

 Aaron Nietschke        Knee Season

 Christian Salem         Hamstring Test

 Joel Smith                  Finger Test

 Jack Viney                 Foot 2 weeks

 Sam Weideman        Leg 4-6 weeks

 

So assuming May plays on the magic 12th day we will definately be without Viney, Weed, B Brown and likely Hibberd

Brayshaw, Melksham, Salem will need to prove their fitness this weekend you'd imgaine

BAU, 10/12 on the player injury list. Same old same old. Will it ever change? 

Before round 1.  Light duties.  Running and running and more running only.  No contested work. No jumping.  No sharp objects. No cooking.  No heavy labour.  ???Break out the cotton wool imv. We need everyone fit and available.  

 

I'll get this out here now: think we're going to really struggle in at least the first part of this year. We've got our two main talls out of the forward line, so not only will they miss a lot of training, the crucial point is that the rest of the team will have missed a LOT of training with them. Systems? Mid-Forward connection? Forget it.

Add to that, similar comments for the absence of Kozzie, Brayshaw and Viney, where the lack of training time together will have consequences on the whole team, regardless of how the individuals can get back into shape.

Finally, throw a few others into a similar basket: Melksham and Hibberd, but also players like Salem.

Sure, we can eventually get these players back on the field. But we can never make up for the lost training TOGETHER.

10 minutes ago, bing181 said:

I'll get this out here now: think we're going to really struggle in at least the first part of this year. We've got our two main talls out of the forward line, so not only will they miss a lot of training, the crucial point is that the rest of the team will have missed a LOT of training with them. Systems? Mid-Forward connection? Forget it.

Add to that, similar comments for the absence of Kozzie, Brayshaw and Viney, where the lack of training time together will have consequences on the whole team, regardless of how the individuals can get back into shape.

Finally, throw a few others into a similar basket: Melksham and Hibberd, but also players like Salem.

Sure, we can eventually get these players back on the field. But we can never make up for the lost training TOGETHER.

Agree 100%. Just don’t see how we can kick a winning score with the outs we have. Wouldn’t be surprised if we are 0/6, then the season is gone. We just don’t have the depth to cover. Depressing.


3 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Darren Burgess must be on long service leave

Ah yes, the Great Messiah. Fitness staff, totally over rated.

Not a good situation Re injuries with 10 days to go to Round 1. There are some critical players that are uncertain.

From the list above I think that the following players will definately line up:

Oliver - rested on Monday

Salem - Hammy twinge a lot of time to get it right from the time of injury

May - 12 day protocol, good to go if reports are correct and he ha no adverse reactions.

The following players need to play the VFL practicce match coming up to have a chance of being there Round 1:

Brayshaw - Played on Monday. will benefit from the run

Hibberd - Needs the run may not have the fitness for R1

Melksham - see Hibberd

Smith - see Hibberd

Viney to miss R1 should be good to go after that.

Brown/Wiedeman - 426 weeks Posted when? May be ready for round 3 to 5?

The other three out for season or indefinately.

My take? Hibberd, Melksham and Smith will not be ready for R1. the rest should be ok.

4 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

  PLAYER INJURY LENGTH
BRAYSHAW Angus.png Angus Brayshaw Foot Test
HIBBERD Michael.png Michael Hibberd Ankle Test
MAY Steven.png Steven May Concussion Test
MELKSHAM Jake.png Jake Melksham Hamstring Test
OLIVER Clayton.png Clayton Oliver Soreness Test
SALEM Christian.png Christian Salem Hamstring Test
SMITH Joel.png Joel Smith Finger Test
VINEY Jack.png Jack Viney Foot 1-2 Weeks
BROWN Ben.png Ben Brown Knee 4-6 Weeks
WEIDEMAN Sam.png Sam Weideman Leg 4-6 Weeks
LOCKHART Jay.png Jay Lockhart Testicles Indefinite
HORE Marty.png Marty Hore Knee Season
NIETSCHKE Aaron.png Aaron Nietschke Knee Season

 

Big list. Always seems to be the same players eg, Weideman, Viney, Smith. 

 

3 best 22 players injured for round 1. Viney back for round 2

that leave two injured players. 

no excuses demons. These blokes have played together enough. Time for regular finals


2 hours ago, CHF said:

My take? Hibberd, Melksham and Smith will not be ready for R1. the rest should be ok

Getting them on the field is only half of it.

12 minutes ago, bing181 said:

Getting them on the field is only half of it.

Agree with that but I do not see them as critical longer term players.

11 hours ago, bobby1554 said:

Ah yes, the Great Messiah. Fitness staff, totally over rated.

How exactly are fitness staff to blame for players getting injured?  What are they doing wrong?

Some people seem to be laying the ground work for a 'pre-season, injury based excuse' in case we don't do well in 2021.

And at first glance the injury list doesn't look good.  But on closer inspection:

  • 7 of our best/better players are 'Test'.  .
  • 4 of those:  J.  Smith, Salem, Oliver and May have completed all the pre-season.  
  • The other 3:  Brayshaw, Hibberd and Melksham have many pre-seasons under their belt so match practice may be an issue for just the first few games but not a reason to derail the season.
  • Brayshaw last week played and is playing in the VFL this week.
  • Those 7 players and Viney are highly experienced and have played together for years so if they don't know and practiced each others games or know the overall game plan by now we are in a world of hurt. 
  • Picket, Weidemen and B. Brown have missed the second half of the preseason.  Picket will take some time to get into the season and we will miss Weidemen and Brown for quite a while.
  • The others are depth players who probably wouldn't get a game unless there were multiple injuries in their role. 

So, imv the injury list size and some players not practicing together in this preason are not a reason to start thinking of excuses for the year.

Some perspective is required.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

30 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Some people seem to be laying the ground work for a 'pre-season, injury based excuse' in case we don't do well in 2021.

And at first glance the injury list doesn't look good.  But on closer inspection:

  • 7 of our best/better players are 'Test'.  .
  • 4 of those:  J.  Smith, Salem, Oliver and May have completed all the pre-season.  
  • The other 3:  Brayshaw, Hibberd and Melksham have many pre-seasons under their belt so match practice may be an issue for just the first few games but not a reason to derail the season.
  • Brayshaw last week played and is playing in the VFL this week.
  • Those 7 players and Viney are highly experienced and have played together for years so if they don't know and practiced each others games or know the overall game plan by now we are in a world of hurt. 
  • Picket, Weidemen and B. Brown have missed the second half of the preseason.  Picket will take some time to get into the season and we will miss Weidemen and Brown for quite a while.
  • The others are depth players who probably wouldn't get a game unless there were multiple injuries in their role. 

So, imv the injury list size and some players not practicing together in this preason are not a reason to start thinking of excuses for the year.

Some perspective is required.

You are 95% correct LH. Thanks for given me a wee bit more confidence. 


1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Some people seem to be laying the ground work for a 'pre-season, injury based excuse' in case we don't do well in 2021.

So, imv the injury list size and some players not practicing together in this preason are not a reason to start thinking of excuses for the year.

Some perspective is required.

If true, then we'll just have to come up with another excuse.

I think we can reasonably expect to add Oliver, Brayshaw, Melksham, Salem and Pickett to the team that played the Dogs - they are some handy ins.

I'm not sure where the Hibberd "test" is coming from - he's listed as "TBA" on the AFL website and seems to have been in rehab for an extended period so I'm not expecting him to play early.

Edited by Pollyanna

39 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

I think we can reasonably expect to add Oliver, Brayshaw, Melksham, Salem and Pickett to the team that played the Dogs - they are some handy ins.

I'm not sure where the Hibberd "test" is coming from - he's listed as "TBA" on the AFL website and seems to have been in rehab for an extended period so I'm not expecting him to play early.

Yes, certainly some very handy ins.  My guess is most teams will be lacking match practice in the early games in part because of the shorter preseason and in part lack of practice games.  So we shouldn't be too rusty in comparison to say Freo or the Saints who we play in the early rounds.

Not sure Hibberd is in our starting 22 anymore so I don't mind if he isn't available for a while.  We play Salem, Rivers and maybe Bowey/Jetta/J.Smith until he is fit enough to play regularly.    

2 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

 I pray to the almighty gods that there is a VFL practice game this week and Melk, Hibbo and Angus can get a full game in before round 1.

There is a game this week V's Box Hill.

You'd imagine Melksham will play this week as he did most of the training yesterday and if Brayshaw gets through ok, he'll certainly play round 1. Melksham maybe for round 2.

Hibberd was in full training yesterday according to reports but has been in rehab the entire pre season so a round 3-4 return looks more likely you'd think.

 


3 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

There is a game this week V's Box Hill.

You'd imagine Melksham will play this week as he did most of the training yesterday and if Brayshaw gets through ok, he'll certainly play round 1. Melksham maybe for round 2.

Hibberd was in full training yesterday according to reports but has been in rehab the entire pre season so a round 3-4 return looks more likely you'd think.

 

Thats good news.  Might have all three ready vs Freo.

 
On 3/8/2021 at 8:07 PM, dazzledavey36 said:

Disappointing to hear...he's body just doesn't seem.up to the rigours of AFL footy.

It is disappointing, he does have much to offer our team when played in the correct position with teammates who, using eyes-up, bother to see him in forward line space(s) and when on a lead, or clear from an opponent, can mark and kick through the big sticks quite bluddey well. Hope he recovers from this set-back, well. He should be better used - he is the play maker type, not suited to throwing himself into the fray recklessly. 

 

17 hours ago, bing181 said:

I'll get this out here now: think we're going to really struggle in at least the first part of this year. We've got our two main talls out of the forward line, so not only will they miss a lot of training, the crucial point is that the rest of the team will have missed a LOT of training with them. Systems? Mid-Forward connection? Forget it.

Add to that, similar comments for the absence of Kozzie, Brayshaw and Viney, where the lack of training time together will have consequences on the whole team, regardless of how the individuals can get back into shape.

Finally, throw a few others into a similar basket: Melksham and Hibberd, but also players like Salem.

Sure, we can eventually get these players back on the field. But we can never make up for the lost training TOGETHER.

Good teams train and play systems so you don’t struggle nearly as much when integrating individuals. 

The majority of the back 7 have trained together over the summer, and played together last year. Same goes for Gawn and experienced mids even if they are mixing up their systems with a new assistant coach. The injuries shouldn’t be an excuse for the backline set up or clearance problems. 

I agree with you on the key forwards. The silver lining is they’ve been out for long enough that Tom and rucks have taken their places and had time and match practice in that role. It will certainly be a challenge trying to bring them back from injury. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 5 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 231 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 47 replies