Jump to content

AFL Trade Radio

Whispering_Jack
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

 
 

Crows need to push this and match it. It’s another example of a top 6 team taking players from the bottom clubs. Free agency as an equalizer!    What BS from Gil Mc !!!!!

 

ronald mcdonald fun GIF by McDonald's CZ/SK

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Early in the piece, clubs have just let player go, this is now changing as they see the impact of restricted agents moving without a decent compensation.  Seems we are seeing a shift in how RFA works.  Plus the "lower" clubs should have more salary cap room to match the payments.

    What i can't believe is the sums supposedly being offered by the saints!  How big is the total player cap?

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    Saints just went from getting Crouch for free to having to trade. Ouch!

    pick 23 is harsh on the crows

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 minute ago, DubDee said:

    Saints just went from getting Crouch for free to having to trade. Ouch!

    pick 23 is harsh on the crows

    Such is the way at AFL house.  Not really a surprise after Crouch racked up a strike for drug possession.   

  • Quote

    8 minutes ago, DubDee said:

    Saints just went from getting Crouch for free to having to trade. Ouch!

    pick 23 is harsh on the crows

    But couldn’t Saints now walk away, leaving him at Crows on matched salary, or being traded to another club. It is still their choice to trade or walk away.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    43 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

    Pick 23 for Crouch

    Pick 7 for Daniher

    FA should be scrapped

    Or the secret formula shouldn't be secret anymore.

    It really is a bit of a joke...

    Everyone knows the formula is not a formula at all just a set of non binding guidelines wholly dependent on the outcome head office would like.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

    Pick 23 for Crouch

    Pick 7 for Daniher

    FA should be scrapped

     

    The AFL have been giving Essendon a nice old helping hand since the drug saga happened.

    Doing everything they can to get the cheats up and running again.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

    Pick 23 for Crouch

    Pick 7 for Daniher

    FA should be scrapped

    It’s purely for the fact that they don’t think he’s worth pick 2, despite Adelaide’s bottom finish.

    It would be akin to them dishing out a similar pick for a player like....ummm I dunno....say James Frawley or something like that.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2

    Can someone enlighten me on the rules of what happens after an offer gets matched? I understand that it means a trade needs to be facilitated but if it can’t does that mean it defers back to the old model of nominating of the PSD/ND?

    That the druggies got pick 7 for Daniher and Crouch gets pick 23 tells you all you need to know about how much of a messed up system it is. 

    100% Adelaide should match, as should GWS. Could be an interesting trade period now that the Saints (and likely the cats) will have to trade for the players they want. 

    Bet you the AFLPA have a cry about their players not being able to get to their clubs of choice easy. 

  • Quote
    On 10/31/2020 at 2:33 PM, Turner said:

    B: HIBBERD, MAY, LEVER

    HB: RIVERS, PETTY, SALEM

    C : LANGDON, VINEY, PHILLIPS

    HF: NARKLE, WEIDEMAN, FRITSCH

    F: PICKETT, B.BROWN, JACKSON

    FOLL: GAWN, OLIVER, PETRACCA

    IC: BRAYSHAW, HARMES, SPARGO, HORE

    Changes: Tomlinson, Melksham, Jones, Hunt --> Petty, Narkle, Harmes, Spargo 

    Tomlinson IMO is a better interchange than Hore as he is much more versatile.

    Like the team but Lockhart IMO needs to be given an opportunity to mind the oppositions smalls. We always get burned by the midgets who are too quick!

  • Quote
    • Love 1

    The Couch pick of 23 is rated as Band 3 (2nd rnd pick).  Daniher was Band 1 = 1st round.  Band 2 = end of first round. 

    So the AFL has 'discounted' the Saints offer to get to Band 3.  Big difference in principle to the Band 1 Adelaide were looking for.  I'm a bit surprised the AFL didn't rate Crouch offer as Band 2, if only to 'manage the optics' which the it loves to do.

    In practice it doesn't matter in this case as Band 2 would be pick 21 because Adelaide finished 18th but in principle it is significant in how it could impact the assessment of other FA offers.

    Edited by Lucifer's Hero

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    10 hours ago, Beetle said:

    It’s purely for the fact that they don’t think he’s worth pick 2, despite Adelaide’s bottom finish.

    It would be akin to them dishing out a similar pick for a player like....ummm I dunno....say James Frawley or something like that.

    The Frawley compensation was our ‘priority pick’. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    If daniher got 3x700k for band 1, the crouch offer must've been pretty low.

  • Quote
    3 minutes ago, TheoX said:

    If daniher got 3x700k for band 1, the crouch offer must've been pretty low.

    Getting caught doing Drugs has hurt.

  • Quote
    10 hours ago, Pates said:

    Can someone enlighten me on the rules of what happens after an offer gets matched? I understand that it means a trade needs to be facilitated but if it can’t does that mean it defers back to the old model of nominating of the PSD/ND?

    That the druggies got pick 7 for Daniher and Crouch gets pick 23 tells you all you need to know about how much of a messed up system it is. 

    100% Adelaide should match, as should GWS. Could be an interesting trade period now that the Saints (and likely the cats) will have to trade for the players they want. 

    Bet you the AFLPA have a cry about their players not being able to get to their clubs of choice easy. 

    The AFLPA and their spokespersons have been spruiking the "Ämerican system" for a while now, except they don't want all the negatives, such as players being traded against their will to maximise trade value and public knowledge of payroll.

    But we are slowly moving closer and closer to the American systems.... I think it's sad but anyway that is irrelevant.

    On the matching, i don't have all the details but essentially by a club matching an RFA offer from another club that player remains contracted to the original club and if the player wants to move a trade has to be agreed to.

    We haven't seen the situation yet where a offer was matched (lets use Crouch) and no trade being agreed to.

    Will be interesting to see what happens and if the Crows get what they want (better than pick 23) as compensation.

  • Quote
    •  

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 9 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sandringham

      The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
      Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: West Coast

      The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 133 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

      This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

        • Angry
        • Sad
        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 484 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: St. Kilda

      Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Like
      • 27 replies
      Demonland

    • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

      It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

        • Thanks
      • 566 replies
      Demonland
    View All