Jump to content

CHANGES: Rd 18 vs Essendon

Demonland
Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

7 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Brown was smart and played a huge role as a key target. Weid gave us nil. Nil.  He really looks lost when he’s got a tough opponent. Doesn’t work hard enough. No gut runs.  

WWEG - what would Eddie give (for weid, who’ll then kick 200 for them year 1)

  • Quote
    • Shocked 1
     
    17 minutes ago, Win4theAges said:

    Freo will knock off the dogs in Cairns next sunday night.

    I agree 

  • Quote

    Smith was okay...

    out Jetta, Melksham,

    in Lockhart, Hannan 

  • Quote
    •  
    7 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

    Brown was smart and played a huge role as a key target. Weid gave us nil. Nil.  He really looks lost when he’s got a tough opponent. Doesn’t work hard enough. No gut runs.  

    Yep, can totally see your point, but I think they played very different roles tonight. Brown roamed high up the ground, was even used in defence in the second half a bit. Thought he played ok. Personally I just think the Jackson/Weid mix has a better chance of kicking goals than a Brown/Jackson mix. Haynes is a very good defender, none of our key forwards would have done much tonight against him and with the standard MFC delivery.

    I just think as far as roles go, Brown and Jackson are the interchangeable ones.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    3 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

    Yep, can totally see your point, but I think they played very different roles tonight. Brown roamed high up the ground, was even used in defence in the second half a bit. Thought he played ok. Personally I just think the Jackson/Weid mix has a better chance of kicking goals than a Brown/Jackson mix. Haynes is a very good defender, none of our key forwards would have done much tonight against him and with the standard MFC delivery.

    I just think as far as roles go, Brown and Jackson are the interchangeable ones.

    Nev its a huge risk bringing an 18 year old into a do or die clash of the year off the back of a 5 week lay off. I just for the life of me see why we need to do that. 

    Yes we've seen the Weid/Jacko work better then most, but that's far too much of a risk for my liking.

  • Quote
    • Like 7
    • Love 1
    Just now, dazzledavey36 said:

    Nev its a huge risk bringing an 18 year old into a do or die clash of the year off the back of a 5 week lay off. I just for the life of me see why we need to do that. 

    Yes we've seen the Weid/Jacko work better then most, but that's far too much of a risk for my liking.

    Yep, can totally see your point. I'm banking on him being totally right to go if selected. I just think it's a more dangerous mix as far as kicking goals goes. Brown was ok tonight sure, but he did his work up the ground, I'd just like to see us have two genuine key forward roles so our entries can be better (fingers crossed).

    We did better with not being boundary line obsessed tonight, but personally I'd like to push that a little harder and be even more direct.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    6 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

    Nev its a huge risk bringing an 18 year old into a do or die clash of the year off the back of a 5 week lay off. I just for the life of me see why we need to do that. 

    Yes we've seen the Weid/Jacko work better then most, but that's far too much of a risk for my liking.

    So when are you playing him? Into a final off the back of a 7 week layoff? Or are you writing him off for the year?

  • Quote
    •  

    I'm tentatively throwing Tomlinson in the out column. He just really seems to lack effort and toughness.

    He's probably doing a bit that we can't see on TV, but he is genuinely the most frustrating player on our list.

    I'm really hoping for Jacko to come back in to provide a bit of assistance to Weideman. The Weid is starting to look tired but don't think we can afford to rest him.

  • Quote

    1 hour ago, Dr.D said:

    most important game for the year? you've got to be kidding? The game of the year was vs Sydney and then consequently Freo. These games are meaningless.We can't make finals unless some big upsets happen. 

    So I've always thought people switching AFL teams was an indicator of an especially weak character and have judged them accordingly. In your case though I would be fully supportive of you finding some other team to support and would give you a massive pat on the back. Might even pay for a membership for you if you find something you like. Go Hawks! 

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    • Haha 3
    31 minutes ago, Rogue said:

    So when are you playing him? Into a final off the back of a 7 week layoff? Or are you writing him off for the year?

    Unfortunately yes i think we have too? Without no seconds football, its just too much on an 18 year key tall.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    1 hour ago, billyblanks29 said:

    How far off is Luke Jackson? Must have been a bad hammy

    Burgess described it as having "knicked a tendon" and that those were usually around 6 week injuries.

  • Quote

    Out: Jetta, Hunt

    In: Hibberd (Lockhart if not fit), Harmes (to play solely as a mid-forward rotation)

    Can't see us putting Jackson in off a 6-week injury and no match fitness while Brown has pulled his weight and deserves to stay there for now.

    I love Jetta and how he has forged his career but sadly I think the game has gone past him now. He also feels incredibly injury prone at the moment, perhaps a testament to how hard and courageous he is. But I can't remember a game in recent memory where he hasn't been injured throughout a game and spent time in the hands of the trainers.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    33 minutes ago, Skuit said:

    So I've always thought people switching AFL teams was an indicator of an especially weak character and have judged them accordingly. In your case though I would be fully supportive of you finding some other team to support and would give you a massive pat on the back. Might even pay for a membership for you if you find something you like. Go Hawks! 

    you'll come around. The dees will lose to the bombers next week and I'll just be shaking my head at people like you that start venting weeks after when the season was really lost. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    1 minute ago, Dr.D said:

    you'll come around. The dees will lose to the bombers next week and I'll just be shaking my head at people like you that start venting weeks after when the season was really lost. 

    Rarely vent doctor. I keep all my feelings bottled up inside so I don't annoy other people the internet. 

  • Quote
    • Love 3
    • Haha 2

    I thought it was a classic team effort tonight with several  star performances. Great time to be settled if we are lucky enough to make finals. 

    No change unless due to  injuries. 

    Lockhardt for Nev if required. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    vandenBerg --> harmes - obvious like for like ugrade

    jetta --> lockhart - injured

    smith --> hibberd - matchups firstly + possessions (his general defensive form has been decent)

    anb --> bennell - didnt do enough, never does and its do or die

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    The defensive structure was mostly ok, one terrible breakdown that led to a walk in goal but otherwise the positioning was good, but in terms of nailing intercept chances, winning the ground balls and using the ball it was horrendous. We gifted so many goals with dropped marks, awful defending once the ball hit the ground and turnovers.

    None of Tomlinson, Jetta or Smith looked up to it and Lever was his typical hot and cold self.

    I'd be happy to swap all 3 of those for Hibberd and 2 of Wagner (who didn't do a lot wrong), Lockhart and Hore. Doubt we'll see 3 changes but something has to shift there.

    In terms of the mids and forwards I don't know how much to change. LJ for Brown has to be a chance but maybe we don't rush the big fella back for a one off game and let Brown face his old side.

    I think Hunt and Vanders might be the most shaky. Baker is hardly a lock either. I'm assuming Melksham is off limits for whatever reason but most likely goes back to the forward line. Sparrow and Harmes the options.

     

  • Quote
    1 minute ago, Turner said:

    vandenBerg --> harmes - obvious like for like ugrade

    jetta --> lockhart - injured

    smith --> hibberd - matchups firstly + possessions (his general defensive form has been decent)

    anb --> bennell - didnt do enough, never does and its do or die

     

    Had a very good second half and we aren't dropping one of our best pressure players for a poor one.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Is Sparrow over his injury? Wonder if he'll come in for someone like AVB or ANB.

  • Quote
    9 minutes ago, The Lobster Effect said:

    Is Sparrow over his injury? Wonder if he'll come in for someone like AVB or ANB.

    i hope not. I thought ANB wasn't too bad tonight and I'd prefer the big body of AVB over sparrow

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, Dr.D said:

    you'll come around. The dees will lose to the bombers next week and I'll just be shaking my head at people like you that start venting weeks after when the season was really lost. 

    Quick question, why are you here?

    What do you get out of it? Is it to get one over genuine supporters who might have some modicum of hope?

    Let's say you're right and we lose next week - is all that head shaking going to give you some form of satisfaction?

  • Quote
    • Like 5
     

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Hawthorn

      There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Footscray

      At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Brisbane

      The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 89 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Hawthorn

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 39 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

      Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Like
      • 338 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Hawthorn

      After 3 fantastic week Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award from Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Ed Langdon who round out the Top Five. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Thanks
      • 32 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All