Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Demonland changed the title to The Six Figure Hunt for a New AFL Logo
 
 
14 minutes ago, Demonland said:

They should go back to the original.

nwk8ytrqiom01.png

Will obviously have to be something that tends towards world domination but perhaps I am thinking too small.


AFL:laugh:

 

In all seriousness, I think there is another related issue that needs to be resolved first. What is the name of the sport? Is it "Australian Rules Football"? or "Australian Football"? or simply "AFL"?  In recent years there seems to have been a drift to calling it "AFL", but in so doing it becomes confused when referring to the sport itself in other circumstances. For example, does Casey, a VFL team, play AFL? What about the Essendon District Football League? or TAC cup (or whatever it's called now) or school footy? What game are they playing? Is it logical to play a game called by an abbreviation which means "Australian Football League" when the League is actually the administrative body?

If I were at AFL HQ I'd want the question of product name resolved before worrying about a fresh, new logo.

Edited by La Dee-vina Comedia
typo

2 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

In all seriousness, I think there is another related issue that needs to be resolved first. What is the name of the sport? Is it "Australian Rules Football"? or "Australian Football"? or simply "AFL"?  In recent years there seems to have been a drift to calling it "AFL", but in so doing it becomes confused when referring to the sport itself in other circumstances. For example, does Casey, a VFL team, play AFL? What about the Essendon District Football League? or TAC cup (or whatever it's called now) or school footy? What game are they playing? Is it logical to play a game called by an abbreviation which means Australian Football League" when the League is actually the administrative body?

If I were at AFL HQ I'd want the question of product name resolved before worrying about a fresh, new logo.

Did they ever resolve the ownership of afl.com.

IIRC correctly it was originally registered by a domain name miner. A quick google search shows a site offering the domain name for sale.


Or they could have a competition, and give $1,000 to every junior club in the country. I know mine could make good use of that sort of money.

1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

If I were at AFL HQ I'd want the question of product name resolved before worrying about a fresh, new logo.

Gil himself calls it "AFL" football. He doesn't care.

 

18 minutes ago, poita said:

Or they could have a competition, and give $1,000 to every junior club in the country. I know mine could make good use of that sort of money.

In our latest episode of continual shark jumping, the AFL has chosen to ignore grass roots footy again, preferring to chase new logos that no-one is crying out for.

Coming hard on the heels of actually spending time at the commission discussing whether to recognise ancient VFA flags as VFL/AFL flags (an initiative got up by the Geelong president which will handily award the Cats another 6 flags, not that that would influence his thinkinh). Meanwhile umpiring standards are as low as anyone can remember, and the match review process is a travesty.

Gil doesn't care.

Unbelievable!!

We can’t even secure a new training base and the AFL want a new Logo. 

What a joke

Wish there was a breakaway league so we could forget these cowboys and rule changers...


1200px-Australian_Football_League.svg.png

4 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

In all seriousness, I think there is another related issue that needs to be resolved first. What is the name of the sport? Is it "Australian Rules Football"? or "Australian Football"? or simply "AFL"?  In recent years there seems to have been a drift to calling it "AFL", but in so doing it becomes confused when referring to the sport itself in other circumstances. For example, does Casey, a VFL team, play AFL? What about the Essendon District Football League? or TAC cup (or whatever it's called now) or school footy? What game are they playing? Is it logical to play a game called by an abbreviation which means "Australian Football League" when the League is actually the administrative body?

If I were at AFL HQ I'd want the question of product name resolved before worrying about a fresh, new logo.

Australian Rules Football. Correct anyone who refers to the sport as AFL, and treat them like heathens from then on.

4 hours ago, poita said:

Or they could have a competition, and give $1,000 to every junior club in the country. I know mine could make good use of that sort of money.

Forget it Poita,  the AFL couldn't give a [censored] about grassroots football clubs.

1 hour ago, Nasher said:

Australian Rules Football. Correct anyone who refers to the sport as AFL, and treat them like heathens from then on.

I agree with this, and expect the same reaction as you get when telling soccer fans that it's not "football", it's "association football".

("soccer" being an abbreviation of "association".)

50 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

Forget it Poita,  the AFL couldn't give a [censored] about grassroots football clubs.

Where's the revenue from grassroots football? The economic rationalists at AFL house can't see the value in it.


I say they just leave it as a rolling logo of the current rule-of-the-week written out in Comic sans, preceded by the words "A game where…" and followed by the words "I'd like to see that!" Example provided for effect (you can imagine the font):

A game where…

players entering the protected zone must teleport fifteen (15)
metres away instantaneously or be shot at dawn.

I'd like to see that!

Edited by Chook

6 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

D9-C725-AC-A89-C-4-D3-E-A348-95482-C978-

Gawd!  Imagine how many filthy holes that tongue has been in.

11 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

Gawd!  Imagine how many filthy holes that tongue has been in.

YUCK?

 
20 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

Gawd!  Imagine how many filthy holes that tongue has been in.

Yep...   startin' off with his own mouth,  just to kick things off.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Vomit
      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 253 replies