Jump to content

Featured Replies

43 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Careful.

You're not allowed to bagĀ Pert around here.

They'll all tell you it'sĀ a complete coincidence and a freak occurrenceĀ that we're 3-7 with almost the worst percentage in the league and 90% of the list going backwards., in the time he's come on board.

Of course it is, BBP. Absolute coincidence andĀ that is what is so fascinating. Don't you think? No-one can accuse our beloved Gary at this crisis point.Ā 

Ā 

Players coming back from off season surgeryĀ moving from preseason mode to inseason matchplay mode before they'd attained required fitness base an issue. Tommy Mac a prime example. Had surgery on both ankles yet was back playing in JLT1 where it was obvious that he was well below his previous fitness levels. He shouldĀ  have stayed in preseason mode putting miles in the legsĀ till he got close to his previous fitness levels. Ā Jack Viney another. Coming off 2 seasons ruined by foot injury he played one Casey praccy match and then straight in for round 1 where his lack of conditioning and matchĀ  fitness was obvious.

What did Petracca have that limited his pre-season? I dont recall him being out for extended time or in for surgery?Ā 

One thing I do know, that is that when we finally find out what is going on with injuries and their mis-handling, it will start with the preamble from the coach or Pert that:Ā Ā "we all know that... blah blah blah", as if we have known for some time what the F is going on. This is aimed at limiting reaction and gives me the tom [censored].

 
1 hour ago, binman said:

This.

In the Wagner's, Lockhardt, Spargo, possibly Stretch, and possibly Smith we have five players who are good VFL players who would not be in the team if we hadĀ even a third of our injury list available.

Add players like Lewis, Petty (who may not be ready) and Garlett who would not be selected due to form if others were availableĀ and that is closing on half a starting 22 who shouldĀ  be playing VFL.

That is a bridge too far, pure and simple.

I just find it ridiculous thatĀ so manyĀ that people, including people paid to comment on football,Ā don't understand this is the reason we are not winning games of AFL football.

One reason is so many footy media people are ex players and the culture of not blaming injury for poor performance is hard wired in of the DNA of football clubs and footy culture more broadly. Stoopid is as Stoopid does.Ā 

Ā 

Has always amused me how, in AFL world you can't give the perfectly reasonable explanation of a massive injury list for poor form. You're just making excuses

36 minutes ago, Damo said:

What did Petracca have that limited his pre-season? I dont recall him being out for extended time or in for surgery?Ā 

One thing I do know, that is that when we finally find out what is going on with injuries and their mis-handling, it will start with the preamble from the coach or Pert that:Ā Ā "we all know that... blah blah blah", as if we have known for some time what the F is going on. This is aimed at limiting reaction and gives me the tom [censored].

He had a knee operation after last season


1 hour ago, Damo said:

What did Petracca have that limited his pre-season? I dont recall him being out for extended time or in for surgery?Ā 

One thing I do know, that is that when we finally find out what is going on with injuries and their mis-handling, it will start with the preamble from the coach or Pert that:Ā Ā "we all know that... blah blah blah", as if we have known for some time what the F is going on. This is aimed at limiting reaction and gives me the tom [censored].

I am amused that you used some rhyming slang for the last two words of yourĀ post to avoid using a known swear wordĀ only to have the auto-censor decide that the cleaned-up version doesn't meet its definition of an appropriate community standardĀ anyway.

4 hours ago, Damo said:

Im flummoxed that journos who can find the most insignificant molehills to explore, havent drilled into this yet.

Because there's nothing to drill into. "Injuries take the time they take to heal" isn't exactly major clickbait.

10 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I am amused that you used some rhyming slang for the last two words of yourĀ post to avoid using a known swear wordĀ only to have the auto-censor decide that the cleaned-up version doesn't meet its definition of an appropriate community standardĀ anyway.

Interesting thing " appropriate community standard" LDC.

Really depends on what community you happen to be in to a large extent.

I am not big on censorship, the biggest problem is it usually depends on the sensor and we all know that can mean varying levels Ā  however I am happy with the general Ā level on Demonland.

Ā 
2 hours ago, demoniac said:

Players coming back from off season surgeryĀ moving from preseason mode to inseason matchplay mode before they'd attained required fitness base an issue. Tommy Mac a prime example. Had surgery on both ankles yet was back playing in JLT1 where it was obvious that he was well below his previous fitness levels. He shouldĀ  have stayed in preseason mode putting miles in the legsĀ till he got close to his previous fitness levels. Ā Jack Viney another. Coming off 2 seasons ruined by foot injury he played one Casey praccy match and then straight in for round 1 where his lack of conditioning and matchĀ  fitness was obvious.

Pretty sure Tom McDonald had the ankles done a couple of years ago and did a solid preseason this year up until developing some knee tendinitis late in preseason.

It sounds like McDonald as well asĀ May and Joel Smith have actually been victim of training too hard.

Oliver, Hunt and Harmes all had shoulder surgeries and were ready to go. As were Jetta and Vanders who's injuries weren't related to their shoulder ops or rehab time as far as I can tell.

Petracca recovered well enough from a knee procedure, as did Marty Hore from an ankle.

Viney and Jones probably shouldn't have played round 1. More faith should've been shown in fringe guys like Stretch who were ready to go. They decided an underdone Viney was more valuable than a fit Stretch. Given Viney got through without injury I can't argue it was the wrong fitness decision, just a bad football one.

Ā 

3 hours ago, ArtificialWisdom said:

Except for last year when we had one of the shortest injury lists all season.

With the same medical/physio team in place.


2 hours ago, Baghdad Bob said:

The majority of our ills go back to the fact that around 13 of the players that played in the Prelim had post season surgery.Ā 

Thus giving us a clear run at a strong pre-season come NovemberĀ to set us up for a serious tilt at 2020.

43 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I am amused that you used some rhyming slang for the last two words of yourĀ post to avoid using a known swear wordĀ only to have the auto-censor decide that the cleaned-up version doesn't meet its definition of an appropriate community standardĀ anyway.

My thoughts exactly LDC.

Well no, but a very lucid explanation of theĀ unintended consequence of my post. Extremely well written.

8 hours ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Vanders

2015 - 14 G

2016 - 14 G

2017 - 0 G

2018 - 7 G

2019 - ????

Cheers DZ - frustrating numbers.

Ā 

4 hours ago, Demonland said:

Look away Dees fans.Ā 

9DC37C93-C229-42AF-9FA4-E74C46DB1F7D.jpeg

Son of a Hore!!

hopefully he just lost a fight with a roll of cling film


4 hours ago, loges said:

Has always amused me how, in AFL world you can't give the perfectly reasonable explanation of a massive injury list for poor form. You're just making excuses

It's weird and my feeling is it a footy thing. Maybe rugby too?

Certainly notĀ the case in cricket. As an example once Smith and Warner went out expectations went through the floor.

My sense is it doesn't happen in NFL or NBA though stand to be corrected as I don't follow either closely. Not sure about top level soccer.

I wonder if it is partly stems from how many players play the game. Most team sportsĀ are dependent onĀ key players to score (e.g. striker, quarter back, pointĀ guard). Footy is higher scoring, with a bigger spread of scorers and with 22 players each player is not as influential as sports with half that or less on the pitch, court etc

Edited by binman

1 hour ago, Monocology said:

Cheers DZ - frustrating numbers.

Ā 

Poor Ā Vanders ....tough run with injuries.Ā 

Would love to have him and a few other hardnuts like him so they can go into bat for Max when he was flat on his back.Ā 

8 hours ago, Deemania since 56 said:

Of course it is, BBP. Absolute coincidence andĀ that is what is so fascinating. Don't you think? No-one can accuse our beloved Gary at this crisis point.Ā 

I blame Pert for us not getting the Old Olympic swimming centre as our baby.

His pertinence,Ā  is just a bridge too far,Ā  for me.

Ā 

He's to blame,Ā  for us not having a Home Base...Ā  and he's been sent to us,Ā  as his Penance.

4 hours ago, binman said:

It's weird and my feeling is it a footy thing. Maybe rugby too?

Certainly notĀ the case in cricket. As an example once Smith and Warner went out expectations went through the floor.

My sense is it doesn't happen in NFL or NBA though stand to be corrected as I don't follow either closely. Not sure about top level soccer.

I wonder if it is partly stems from how many players play the game. Most team sportsĀ are dependent onĀ key players to score (e.g. striker, quarter back, pointĀ guard). Footy is higher scoring, with a bigger spread of scorers and with 22 players each player is not as influential as sports with half that or less on the pitch, court etc

That's an intense argument,Ā  'BM'r.


Really does offer some insight into what's happened this year. While other teams have been hit with injuries, and the Tigers, Collingwood etc. are mentioned as covering their injuries fairly well, we are not only missing best 22 but also those fringe 22 guys who would replace them. The thought that you need at least 30 good AFL players on a list is right, but they need to be ready to play, we've had 6/7 at VFL level for a while and really some of those are 1st year players who shouldn't in normal circumstances get close to a game.

Ā 

D7ualCjU8AArInq.jpg:large

1 hour ago, Red and Blue realist said:

Really does offer some insight into what's happened this year. While other teams have been hit with injuries, and the Tigers, Collingwood etc. are mentioned as covering their injuries fairly well, we are not only missing best 22 but also those fringe 22 guys who would replace them. The thought that you need at least 30 good AFL players on a list is right, but they need to be ready to play, we've had 6/7 at VFL level for a while and really some of those are 1st year players who shouldn't in normal circumstances get close to a game.

Ā 

D7ualCjU8AArInq.jpg:large

Don't post that on demonland, most of them will reckon your'e just making excuses.

Ā 

Why does LeverĀ look like he just got out of a prisoner of warĀ camp? Puny, pale, unwell-looking. His arms and legs look wasted. Why hasn’t he been in the gym building up his physique in the 12 months he’s been injured/in rehab?

Ā 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Ā Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 231 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies