Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

...What have they all got in common??

All have had significant experience as either TAC Cup, Assistant coach, Head coach APS coach or other football roles.

However most ARE WITH OTHER CLUBS ! WHY?

My point is all have been coached by either Barassi, Northey, Balme, or The reverend! all have had significant playing careers and so...

WHY AREN'T THEY WITH THE DEES in some capacity.?? I reckon they would be sensational as assistant coaches with us and lend a significant Brains trust of intrinsic footy knowledge and old fashion Dees values to our current players. Thoughts?

Edited by picket fence

 

It breaks my heart to see them in a coaching capacity with other clubs.

My kids come home when they want something..........

 
4 minutes ago, picket fence said:

...What have they all got in common??

All have had significant experience as either TAC Cup, Assistant coach, Head coach APS coach or other football roles.

However most ARE WITH OTHER CLUBS ! WHY?

My point is all have been coached by either Barassi, Northey, Balme, or The reverend! all have had significant playing careers and so...

WHY AREN'T THEY WITH THE DEES in some capacity.?? I reckon they would be sensational as assistant coaches with us and lend a significant Brains trust of intrinsic footy knowledge and old fashion Dees values to our current players. Thoughts?

Who's Grinter with? Yeats?

Yze is at the Hawks eh?

Greenie? And Cam the Bruce?

Does it break the hearts of Sydney supporters to see Ben Mathews at our club?

Geelong supporters to see Max Rooke with us?

North supporters to see Longmire coaching Sydney?

Was Green not captain of our club for 186?  I prefer to not have anyone that was associated with our club back then anywhere near our club nowadays.

I'm amazed at how many of our supporters love a good fairytale.


Haha Green got the chop from both Carlton and North. Obviously cant coach to save himself. Not sure what hes doing these days?

I remember when I was working at Etihad Service Entry when Neita, Bruce & Yze came through in hawks colours, I instinctively yelled out to OOze "your in the wrong colours" and he gave me a smile................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

I believe Rod Grinter holds the prestigious position of Director Of Football at CBC Toorak.

 

I am one for the best candidate not the best ex Dees candidate.


So every former player that gets into coaching has to stay at the club?  Look what happened last time we gave gigs to former players within the club.  We had pretty much the worst season in AFL history.  You hire the people right for the job, regardless of where they played.  It shouldn't factor into the decision.

It's always nice to get our own back especially if they are the right guys for the job. I was stoked when Viney came back for instance. But its definitely gotta be best man for the job, can't get them all.

1 hour ago, demoniac said:

I believe Rod Grinter holds the prestigious position of Director Of Football at CBC Toorak.

 

I am one for the best candidate not the best ex Dees candidate.

Word.

If we want to be the best club possible, it means getting the best people in to call the shots.

The last boys club nearly killed us permanently.

2 hours ago, willmoy said:

My kids come home when they want something..........

Do a runner: NFA...

 


I too support the concept that we need the best people not the best ex demons.

But I recently listened to an interview with Stan Alves on 774 with Matt Clench on Stan’s retirement from broadcasting the game. Stan said he no longer liked the modern game and called time on himself because he was not adding value. It was best for younger people to take over. Very honest appraisal. 

A a large part of the interview was about Stan losing his son early and the devastating affect that it had on him, very moving and instructional. But also how it motivated him later on. 

But another interest in the discussion was on his time as coach at St Kilda. He was a real innovator and took the Saints from nowhere to a Grand Final but was constantly being challenged by the Board about his unorthodox (at the time) tactics. Think leadership groups, meditation before games, letting players take responsibility for their own training, every player must set personal goals, it goes on and on reflecting modern football methods but maybe a decade or more ahead of his time. I thought Grant Thomas was a real innovator but I think he took a lot of ideas from Stan. 

They lost the final and the next year struggled somewhat and his enemies in the Board moved on him in 1998 and he was gone.And the Saints went downhill until 2009.

 What an opportunity for MFC to have bought him on board as an advisor for the Reverend? 

Stan came across as an exceptional person who would have added immense value to the MFC as assistant coach, mentor or Board Member. 

Another missed opportunity I believe but he could still fill a role on the board. 

5 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

I too support the concept that we need the best people not the best ex demons.

But I recently listened to an interview with Stan Alves on 774 with Matt Clench on Stan’s retirement from broadcasting the game. Stan said he no longer liked the modern game and called time on himself because he was not adding value. It was best for younger people to take over. Very honest appraisal. 

A a large part of the interview was about Stan losing his son early and the devastating affect that it had on him, very moving and instructional. But also how it motivated him later on. 

But another interest in the discussion was on his time as coach at St Kilda. He was a real innovator and took the Saints from nowhere to a Grand Final but was constantly being challenged by the Board about his unorthodox (at the time) tactics. Think leadership groups, meditation before games, letting players take responsibility for their own training, every player must set personal goals, it goes on and on reflecting modern football methods but maybe a decade or more ahead of his time. I thought Grant Thomas was a real innovator but I think he took a lot of ideas from Stan. 

They lost the final and the next year struggled somewhat and his enemies in the Board moved on him in 1998 and he was gone.And the Saints went downhill until 2009.

 What an opportunity for MFC to have bought him on board as an advisor for the Reverend? 

Stan came across as an exceptional person who would have added immense value to the MFC as assistant coach, mentor or Board Member. 

Another missed opportunity I believe but he could still fill a role on the board. 

Mate had a dog called Stanley back in the early 70’s with a little Number 15 jumper. 

Met him a couple of times when he was Captain. Great guy. 

Was devastated when he and Crackers won a flag at Nought. 

Should have been us. Then Greg Wells left. 

 

Bitter ever since....

4 hours ago, The Chazz said:

Does it break the hearts of Sydney supporters to see Ben Mathews at our club?

Geelong supporters to see Max Rooke with us?

North supporters to see Longmire coaching Sydney?

Was Green not captain of our club for 186?  I prefer to not have anyone that was associated with our club back then anywhere near our club nowadays.

I'm amazed at how many of our supporters love a good fairytale.

Bang on Chazz. Get the best available. Loyalty in AFL is an illusion

4 hours ago, picket fence said:

...What have they all got in common??

All have had significant experience as either TAC Cup, Assistant coach, Head coach APS coach or other football roles.

However most ARE WITH OTHER CLUBS ! WHY?

My point is all have been coached by either Barassi, Northey, Balme, or The reverend! all have had significant playing careers and so...

WHY AREN'T THEY WITH THE DEES in some capacity.?? I reckon they would be sensational as assistant coaches with us and lend a significant Brains trust of intrinsic footy knowledge and old fashion Dees values to our current players. Thoughts?

Simple, so we don't continue to be inbred, Re our development.

Outside footy people coming into our system, will notice the differences, and hopefully be able to pick the failings, compared to winning ways they have experienced at their former clubs.

 

They will hopeful recognise these idiosyncrasies that don't work well for us and then change them to improve us. 

 

Same for Off-Field, Re Admin and Boards.

So no, we don't want our old boys, coaching the new boys.    We are NOT a power club, and have not been for 5 decades.


I f we want to cultivate a premiership culture then we need to recruit coaches with premiership experience.

No point bringing our old crew back, they haven't tasted premiership success so how are they going to help build a premiership culture here?

We had an old boys club in the mid noughties.

How did that go for us?

12 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Mate had a dog called Stanley back in the early 70’s with a little Number 15 jumper. 

Met him a couple of times when he was Captain. Great guy. 

Was devastated when he and Crackers won a flag at Nought. 

Should have been us. Then Greg Wells left. 

 

Bitter ever since....

I will never forget Crackers Fn Keenan hitting up on me at the 1st at Gisborne GC, almost hitting me. I don't think he took to well to a small overweight 16 yo calling him out on it.

Crackers bloody Keenan

 

I said this in the Goodwin thread:

"He needs to be surrounded with more experience for a start, Rawlings should come back, Chaplin can go. I wouldn't mind seeing Adem Yze coming across from the Hawks and back to his old club, as well as Ratten and Scott Burns. Or perhaps raid Geelong for Knights or Scarlett to come meet up with Rooke and Egan.

He had Roos' team with Stone, Bird and co but they left, we need to give him the best opportunity to succeed, even if he isn't the right guy or continues his ways, before his contract runs out at end of next year. "

Yze would be the only Demon I'd look into and only because he's been in a successful Hawks system for a long time (2011). If I were the club I'd be trying everything to raid the successful clubs to surround Goodwin with.

13 hours ago, Earl Hood said:

I too support the concept that we need the best people not the best ex demons.

But I recently listened to an interview with Stan Alves on 774 with Matt Clench on Stan’s retirement from broadcasting the game. Stan said he no longer liked the modern game and called time on himself because he was not adding value. It was best for younger people to take over. Very honest appraisal. 

A a large part of the interview was about Stan losing his son early and the devastating affect that it had on him, very moving and instructional. But also how it motivated him later on. 

But another interest in the discussion was on his time as coach at St Kilda. He was a real innovator and took the Saints from nowhere to a Grand Final but was constantly being challenged by the Board about his unorthodox (at the time) tactics. Think leadership groups, meditation before games, letting players take responsibility for their own training, every player must set personal goals, it goes on and on reflecting modern football methods but maybe a decade or more ahead of his time. I thought Grant Thomas was a real innovator but I think he took a lot of ideas from Stan. 

They lost the final and the next year struggled somewhat and his enemies in the Board moved on him in 1998 and he was gone.And the Saints went downhill until 2009.

 What an opportunity for MFC to have bought him on board as an advisor for the Reverend? 

Stan came across as an exceptional person who would have added immense value to the MFC as assistant coach, mentor or Board Member. 

Another missed opportunity I believe but he could still fill a role on the board. 

Absolute respect for the man, the player, the Captain of MFC and the inspiration that he brought to the Club and the game. Stan was the full package and for years (just because he was younger then), I dreamed on him becoming the MFC Coach after Northey as the two, as coaches, players and leaders of men had so much in common. Alves in so many regards was always one of the historical past who generated immense pride (in a continuously losing team) and respect. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 198 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 517 replies