Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
3 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

PJ is forever an optimist as am I. Good to see it’s part of our “business” analysis and I hope we don’t just replace the pokies profit but we exceed it. 

On 4/7/2018 at 6:31 PM, Demonland said:

 

That's the irony of being a club that has a relatively low income level from the pokies. The less you receive the easier it is to replace. Hawthorn, Carton and Collingwood get greater revenues and therefore will find it much harder to wean themselves off the pokies, should they choose to do so.

Edited by La Dee-vina Comedia
typo fix

  • 3 months later...
 

Family Club yeah?


3 hours ago, Clintosaurus said:

Family Club yeah?

I believe the HFC annual profit matched their gambling profit last year

I've had lots of twists and turns over this and similar issues over the years and I've battled my own "demons" often enough.

Now I reckon [censored] it - no one holds a gun to your head and makes you play a pokie. No one shoves a ciggy in your mouth and makes you inhale. No one tips booze down your gob and makes you drink it.

Surely at some point we must take responsibility for our own actions.

How [censored] weak has society become?

7 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I've had lots of twists and turns over this and similar issues over the years and I've battled my own "demons" often enough.

Now I reckon [censored] it - no one holds a gun to your head and makes you play a pokie. No one shoves a ciggy in your mouth and makes you inhale. No one tips booze down your gob and makes you drink it.

Surely at some point we must take responsibility for our own actions.

How [censored] weak has society become?

In answer to your last line...

Very.

 
4 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I've had lots of twists and turns over this and similar issues over the years and I've battled my own "demons" often enough.

Now I reckon [censored] it - no one holds a gun to your head and makes you play a pokie. No one shoves a ciggy in your mouth and makes you inhale. No one tips booze down your gob and makes you drink it.

Surely at some point we must take responsibility for our own actions.

How [censored] weak has society become?

It’s  much more complicated than that. All those things are highly addictive. It’s not weak to be addicted. It’s  an illness like any other. Labelling those suffering as weak just increases there unhappiness and drives them further down the hole. The country should just charge $1350 for a pack of ciggies as that’s roughly the true cost when you look at the health implications. Alcohol needs to be 7 -9 times more expensive if you factor in health costs. Gambling just needs to have its advertising banned and poker machines banned. The vast majority of users are the very people who can least afford it

if only our governments had the balls to do that

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm told the standard of the food and amenities under the new management at the Bentleigh Club is much better these days.

LeighOak also advertising new management but I haven't stepped in there yet either.

  • 4 months later...

Sounds like Essendon are continuing their highly ethical approach to sport:

"Melton City Council voted unanimously on Monday night to approve a 29-year lease extension allowing the Essendon Football Club to continue operating Melton Country Club and its 89 poker machines until the end of 2047.

The lease for the venue, at which gamblers lost $5.69 million in 2017-18, was due to expire in 2022."

"Essendon, who also own 101 poker machines at Windy Hill, refused to comment when contacted by The Age. "

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-lock-in-three-decade-pokies-lease-20181211-p50lkd.html

5 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Sounds like Essendon are continuing their highly ethical approach to sport:

"Melton City Council voted unanimously on Monday night to approve a 29-year lease extension allowing the Essendon Football Club to continue operating Melton Country Club and its 89 poker machines until the end of 2047.

The lease for the venue, at which gamblers lost $5.69 million in 2017-18, was due to expire in 2022."

"Essendon, who also own 101 poker machines at Windy Hill, refused to comment when contacted by The Age. "

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-lock-in-three-decade-pokies-lease-20181211-p50lkd.html

Nothing has changed. I suspect that “values” are not part of their mission statement. 

IMO clubs who have adopted family values over pokies should be rewarded by the AFL,  as otherwise the clubs like Hawks, Blues and Bombers have an advantage in income, derived from gambling, which is so harmful to so many.

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

IMO clubs who have adopted family values over pokies should be rewarded by the AFL,  as otherwise the clubs like Hawks, Blues and Bombers have an advantage in income, derived from gambling, which is so harmful to so many.

Agree but sport and gambling is so entwined in Australian culture that it could take a while.

Ironic that the biggest operators of pokies if one includes NSW are sports clubs and the RSL.

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

IMO clubs who have adopted family values over pokies should be rewarded by the AFL,  as otherwise the clubs like Hawks, Blues and Bombers have an advantage in income, derived from gambling, which is so harmful to so many.

The MFC didn't have to make the decision they did and people don't have to throw their money down the drain.

There should be no "reward" for clubs who make a business decision whether it's inspired by community spirit, or not..


30 minutes ago, ProDee said:

The MFC didn't have to make the decision they did and people don't have to throw their money down the drain.

There should be no "reward" for clubs who make a business decision whether it's inspired by community spirit, or not..

would seem more a political than business decision to me, which usually involves a stick or carrot situation, so a "reward" could be seen either as a carrot or a non-stick.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/pull-plug-on-pokies-afl-commission-chairman-richard-goyder-20170821-gy12n7.html

Quote

AFL commission chairman Richard Goyder says he "hates" pokies, and will seek to use his personal authority to wean clubs off them.

"We're going to have a good look and see whether there's the opportunity to at least lessen the reliance," Goyder told journalist Alan Kohler in an interview for his website The Constant Investor. "Some clubs have got a high dependency on them at the moment, and it's not a matter saying, 'Well let's just stop it'. You've actually got to work through a way of doing it. It's something we and the clubs are looking at, at the moment."

 

3 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Sounds like Essendon are continuing their highly ethical approach to sport:

"Melton City Council voted unanimously on Monday night to approve a 29-year lease extension allowing the Essendon Football Club to continue operating Melton Country Club and its 89 poker machines until the end of 2047.

The lease for the venue, at which gamblers lost $5.69 million in 2017-18, was due to expire in 2022."

"Essendon, who also own 101 poker machines at Windy Hill, refused to comment when contacted by The Age. "

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-lock-in-three-decade-pokies-lease-20181211-p50lkd.html

That is just so Essendrug. Whilst most are trying to remove Pokie reliance, the druggers sign a 30 year extension. They still run their own law book out there. 

Those Masonic roots from the past are still ingrained strongly

Edited by Sir Why You Little

1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Those Masonic roots from the past are still ingrained strongly

@Mods please delete or whatever, masons have nothing to do with pokies in this context.

3 hours ago, ProDee said:

The MFC didn't have to make the decision they did and people don't have to throw their money down the drain.

There should be no "reward" for clubs who make a business decision whether it's inspired by community spirit, or not..

Agree we didn't have to make the decision and also that people don't need to gamble.

However, the AFL rewards clubs that make business decisions and lose money.

I would have thought this has more merit than simply being incompetent in running a club.

1 hour ago, DaisyDeeciple said:

@Mods please delete or whatever, masons have nothing to do with pokies in this context.

Yes I am blaming the Royal Antediluvian Order of the Buffoles (RAOB) myself! 


8 hours ago, Earl Hood said:

Yes I am blaming the Royal Antediluvian Order of the Buffoles (RAOB) myself! 

well i can assure you the uniting church ladies tennis club of burwood had nothing to do with it, earl. i would have heard if they did.

9 hours ago, DaisyDeeciple said:

@Mods please delete or whatever, masons have nothing to do with pokies in this context.

Are you actually offended by this? Wow this is a new one ... 

10 hours ago, Redleg said:

Agree we didn't have to make the decision and also that people don't need to gamble.

However, the AFL rewards clubs that make business decisions and lose money.

I would have thought this has more merit than simply being incompetent in running a club.

I agree that with all things being equal and if people were to enter these venues with a clear mind, then they don't have to gamble.

However, the real world often isn't like that. People aren't a collect, rational intelligence like the Borg in Star Trek. They bring their own foibles and baggage with them.

The thing that seems to be most disturbing about the gambling scene in Australia right now is the predatory nature of it.

Machines tend to be distributed in low socioeconomic areas and in suburbs with higher incidences of family and domestic violence. I wonder why the powers behind these things aren't dumping them in say Canterbury or Brighton? 

And then there is this story which just made me sick to my stomach.

The question isn't an whether we should ban gambling. Doing this has led to it going underground and creating at best, SP bookmakers at your local pub or at worst, characters like Abe Saffron and George Freeman. The issue is whether licensed clubs should be forced to take into consideration the needs of those struggling as they haven't self regulated under the existing framework. If anything their behavior has been almost vulturistic.

And we as a football club have done the right thing in walking away from this industry as it currently exists.

 
11 hours ago, Redleg said:

Agree we didn't have to make the decision and also that people don't need to gamble.

However, the AFL rewards clubs that make business decisions and lose money.

I would have thought this has more merit than simply being incompetent in running a club.

Poker machines are a curse to society and the sooner they get rid of them the better off society will be.

14 hours ago, drysdale demon said:

Poker machines are a curse to society and the sooner they get rid of them the better off society will be.

Who is " they " Mr Super Critic ( critique ) ?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 94 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies