Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

 

 

18 hours ago, Lord Travis said:

100% this. Brown and Weid as legit key forwards who provide a contest and hit the scoreboard. Jacko as a roaming mobile third tall whose time is split between forward line and ruck. Give him license to roam up the ground as a marking option along the wing and work back inside 50. Would be a great setup and 100% can work with the right players. Wouldn’t work with say a Pruess roaming instead of Jacko.

SNAP

16 hours ago, don't make me angry said:

That's a underestimation of Brown's abilities, you don't kick 60 goals a year if you have to have the ball kicked straight on your  chest, do you think that Norths midfielder are that great of kicks, some forwards just know where to lead to take marks, also he averages 1.6 contested marks a game, which is 0.6 better then Jeremy Cameron. And for marks in 50 we average 9 marks a game, which is 1 more then the AFL average, we where 8 th for scoring, it's a bit of a myth that we are the worst side going into forward 50, there are 2 parts with entrance into forward 50, good kicks and also players q0qcp who know how to get in the right spots to take marks. Brown and weed can work well together, two different types of forwards.

DOUBLE SNAP

I think that changes to 5th after round 5

Port - Dixon, Marshall, Ladhams (ruck)

Bris - Hipwood, McStay (Danihar) McInerney (ruck)

WCE - Kennedy, Darling, Allen (ruck)

Rich - Lynch, Reiwoldt, and played 2 genuine ruckman most year

Stk.  King, Battle/membery, Ryder/marshall(ruck)

 

I dont know Id reckon 2 talls and a third part ruck could work

 

I believe many of Browns associates are helping him get to his next destination. On Saturday Barrett had hime going to Melbourne and on SEN this morning the story was his manager ramanauskas was pitching hime to Essendon and Hawthorn. Rama probably feeling guilty for not accepting the offer made at the start of the year.

My son is a Kangas supporter (thanks to my Dad) and he reckons Brown is cooked. He had no pre season this year due to ongoing knee issues. It came as no surprise to my son that Brown's year was so poor, many players who miss significant parts of the pre season struggle. He came back with no practise form and down on fitness. Then he injuries his knee again mid season and doesn't play again.

The lack of interest is you don't know what you are buying! He wont get $ 750K or a 5 year deal, he would also want a club with a good track record of rehabbing players with injuries. Having said that, Essendon would be the last place I would go. The crook knee also stopped his other asset and that was doing some ruck work to give Goldy the occasional rest.

17 hours ago, chookrat said:

If we are to seriously consider Ben Brown we need to stipulate I'm the contract that he changes his ridiculous hair. I don't care how many goals he kicks if so have to see him walk 80 metres when lining up for goal with all eyes on him with his hair bobbing around.

How did a post from the 1970's get into this topic?  Is this a quirk of the new Demonland interface?


1 hour ago, forever demons said:

only if he gets a hair cut

Yeah... god forbid that our players display any form of individuality!!  I'm also with you in petitioning the club, insisting that Gawn shave off that embarrassing beard.

13 minutes ago, hardtack said:

Yeah... god forbid that our players display any form of individuality!!  I'm also with you in petitioning the club, insisting that Gawn shave off that embarrassing beard.

And Jacko’s mullet ?‍♂️

I think we’re a lot more attractive than Essendon in terms of potential to play finals.

Issue will be coin and length of contract. With players leaving they’ll have more capacity to meet his demands and if they get desperate, which l think they will, they can offer him an extra year.

Hopefully he makes his choice based on footy reasons.

 
3 hours ago, Pollyanna said:

Hope it tasted nice, he's talking about Brown.

I was well aware of that but thanks for your valuable input.

2 hours ago, Grimes Times said:

Port - Dixon, Marshall, Ladhams (ruck)

Bris - Hipwood, McStay (Danihar) McInerney (ruck)

WCE - Kennedy, Darling, Allen (ruck)

Rich - Lynch, Reiwoldt, and played 2 genuine ruckman most year

Stk.  King, Battle/membery, Ryder/marshall(ruck)

 

I dont know Id reckon 2 talls and a third part ruck could work

Brown and Weideman at ground level is a real problem IMV. You can't have two guys that barely tackle inside 50 with two mid sized players that have barely tackled for two years in Fritsch and Melksham. 


25 minutes ago, ding said:

I was well aware of that but thanks for your valuable input.

OK-sure.gif.fb75c33fb30d2f5bc6c6888cb6068689.gif

To the topic at hand, surely the arguments of trying to balance Weideman/Brown or neither of them tackling much are just looking for problems where there are none. Brown falling on our lap would be an absolute KotD (for those that remember). I’m sure we’ll manage to find solutions to whatever “problems” fall out of landing an 60 goal a year forward in his prime.

6 minutes ago, Nasher said:

To the topic at hand, surely the arguments of trying to balance Weideman/Brown or neither of them tackling much are just looking for problems where there are none. Brown falling on our lap would be an absolute KotD (for those that remember). I’m sure we’ll manage to find solutions to whatever “problems” fall out of landing an 60 goal a year forward in his prime.

Melbourne has been a huge net for forwards with injuries coming across and flopping or getting more injured. Templeton, Carman, Vardy, M. Clark, S.Clark, Rod Owen - I could go on. That wonky knee spells trouble to me. And, if he was SO good, why would a wooden spooner want to extradite him????

32 minutes ago, Nasher said:

What is with you damn Victorians and wanting to dump your basketcases in to Tassie? You can keep North, thanks.

You have to know Nasher that this is the only way Tassie is getting a side.  You are the fall back state when either North/GWS/Gold Coast are moved there.


1 hour ago, Nasher said:

To the topic at hand, surely the arguments of trying to balance Weideman/Brown or neither of them tackling much are just looking for problems where there are none. Brown falling on our lap would be an absolute KotD (for those that remember). I’m sure we’ll manage to find solutions to whatever “problems” fall out of landing an 60 goal a year forward in his prime.

How can anyone forget?

If we can get McDonald off the books then I'm all for it. Not sure where Jackson fits into that forward line but with his mobility and skill I'm sure they'll find a spot for him. What's the latest talk on trade price? Not keen on giving up a future first at all but would happily give a second for him.

Edited by Nascent

2 hours ago, Pollyanna said:

OK-sure.gif.fb75c33fb30d2f5bc6c6888cb6068689.gif

Haha, love Jennifer Lawrence.

Maybe the guarantee of being able to visit his home town of Hobart in round 23 every year will be enough to get him over the line. 

3 hours ago, Nasher said:

To the topic at hand, surely the arguments of trying to balance Weideman/Brown or neither of them tackling much are just looking for problems where there are none. Brown falling on our lap would be an absolute KotD (for those that remember). I’m sure we’ll manage to find solutions to whatever “problems” fall out of landing an 60 goal a year forward in his prime.

It is a serious problem though. We've never been able to play 2 rucks and even in a number of games gone in with just 1 key forward because the coaches have been so keep to get defensive pressure on. No other team plays 2 big non tackling forwards with any success, why would we be any different? There's a good chance the solution would see one of them dropped to the 2's.

The other question is whether Brown is in his prime any more. It's hard to be entirely confident one way or another. He's been close to 3 goals a game in his career at Docklands, but average 2 a game at the MCG. 


On 10/11/2020 at 5:56 PM, Wells 11 said:

Brown in 2018 was excellent. So was Tmac... whose highlights from that year were equally impressive and we can barely give him away now.  You don’t get rid of a big gun forward for a second rounder unless something serious has happened to his body. We absolutely need due diligence here. Would way rather an elite outside mid. 

What exactly was Brown's issue this year

On 10/11/2020 at 7:30 PM, Skuit said:

Gets way too many cheap free kicks and has this habit of leading up to the ball. No thanks. 

Also, this technique of taking a long run-up and kicking through the ball on a set-shot - wtf? 

I don't care if every player kicking for goal does a Nadal before serving, just want someone anyone to kick the ball between the Big sticks. He's a goal kicker. 

 
2 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

melbourne's hollywood pin-up picked us so she gets my vote

Nathalie Portman | Natalie portman, Natalie portman hot, Natalie portman  star wars

KotD by either NP or JL would do just fine thank you very much.

Could go another 56 years without the premiership still smiling ???

3 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

The other question is whether Brown is in his prime any more. It's hard to be entirely confident one way or another. He's been close to 3 goals a game in his career at Docklands, but averages 2 a game at the MCG. 

The last three Coleman medallists vs. Ben Brown at the MCG. The lack of sample size for Brown at the venue is crazy. This is via https://afltables.com/afl/stats/players/B/Ben_Brown.html

Jack Riewoldt: MCG average: 2.22 goals. 158 games/ 235 goals – 66 behinds (insane accuracy).
Ben Brown: MCG average: 2.1 goals. 10 games/ 21 goals – 13 behinds.
Tom Hawkins: MCG average 1.72 goals. 76 games/ 133 goals – 91 behinds.
Josh Kennedy: MCG average 1.58 goals. 36 games /57 goals – 37 behinds.

The question is invalid and also doesn't stack up. 
 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 27 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 60 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 22 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Like
    • 252 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland