Jump to content

Featured Replies

12 minutes ago, 58er said:

DeeTox 

Brown had injury and personal family  issues which affected his form.

Dont  remember Lockett or Dunstall Getting any more than 25% of their goals on the run! Far from it.

Will give other forwards a lift  as well as get 45/50 plus I think.

Hope so 58er!

 
1 hour ago, dee-tox said:

Whenever Brown played against us I'd be so frustrated that he kicked his four or more goals. Always looked after by the umpires. Jag a couple of assy goals from the pocket, etc.

Not sure what to make of him coming to Melbourne. Having a 200cm proven goalkicker is good in theory. I have my concerns though. Never been a natural footballer. He isn't the strongest guy overhead. Doesn't seem to kick goals on the run.  Not known for his defensive efforts.

Was last year's form only fitness related or symptomatic of where the game is at the moment?  I guess we'll wait and see!

Ben Brown has better career contested mark averages than Josh Kennedy, Jeremy Cameron and equal to Jack Darling. He is in the elite group of contested mark takers in the game and has a 67% goal scoring accuracy for shots on target. In the top handful goals per game scored. Cant get better than that in the modern game. 

Edited by america de cali

On 11/14/2020 at 9:26 AM, Dr. Gonzo said:

It's a joke mate, lighten up

"Joke" definition,

  • n.
    Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line.
  • " I suppose it made you guffaw when you made it"
Your reply is what bigots, xenophobes, homophobes and  sexists say when they're challenged.
 
Now if you want to read something that evokes laughter and amusement check out "What they’re saying in Lulie Street", the exchanges between "Trigon", "buck_nekkid and BBO are comedy gold!
 
Wait a minute ..... I might be getting this all "arze about" did you mean the other definition?
n.
Something that is of ludicrously poor quality.
 
16 minutes ago, dworship said:

"...........

Your reply is what bigots, xenophobes, homophobes and  sexists say when they're challenged.

.............
 

just asking for a friend, but which one (or more) of these do you think dr gonzo is? ?

 

18 hours ago, daisycutter said:

just asking for a friend, but which one (or more) of these do you think dr gonzo is? ?

 

all of the above clearly 


3 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

all of the above clearly 

oh well, could;ve been worse.....you could have been called a privileged white colonial ?

21 hours ago, dee-tox said:

Whenever Brown played against us I'd be so frustrated that he kicked his four or more goals. Always looked after by the umpires. Jag a couple of assy goals from the pocket, etc.

Not sure what to make of him coming to Melbourne. Having a 200cm proven goalkicker is good in theory. I have my concerns though. Never been a natural footballer. He isn't the strongest guy overhead. Doesn't seem to kick goals on the run.  Not known for his defensive efforts.

Was last year's form only fitness related or symptomatic of where the game is at the moment?  I guess we'll wait and see!

I suggest you watch the best of Ben Brown on AFL .com, he takes lots of overhead marks, most of his marks are taken at the highest point, do some research before making statements, about not being strong over head.

19 minutes ago, don't make me angry said:

I suggest you watch the best of Ben Brown on AFL .com, he takes lots of overhead marks, most of his marks are taken at the highest point, do some research before making statements, about not being strong over head.

DeeTox look at my post re goals on the run and IMO I think Ben is at least as strong as Weid Tommy  Jesse Bailey and  Maxy.

I would say I think May and Lever are slightly stronger marks but it's the overall total taken that's important after alI.

I suspect your misgivings will be erased Both in strength and style of goals.

 
50 minutes ago, 58er said:

DeeTox look at my post re goals on the run and IMO I think Ben is at least as strong as Weid Tommy  Jesse Bailey and  Maxy.

I would say I think May and Lever are slightly stronger marks but it's the overall total taken that's important after alI.

I suspect your misgivings will be erased Both in strength and style of goals.

That's the problem with most people's opinion they don't take the time to research things, they just parrot what others say, Ben takes most of his marks at the highest point, this myth that he needs the ball on his chest is unfounded, I watched all his goals in 2018 video, and there are  heaps of overhead marks

Edited by don't make me angry

On 11/15/2020 at 12:39 PM, jumbo returns said:

Gun footballer??

Lordy.....

Yep, John Lord was a great footballer, too. Another Demon of note with a big heart.


3 hours ago, don't make me angry said:

That's the problem with most people's opinion they don't take the time to research things, they just parrot what others say, Ben takes most of his marks at the highest point, this myth that he needs the ball on his chest is unfounded, I watched all his goals in 2018 video, and there are  heaps of overhead marks

Congrats on looking on AFL.com and seeing all of Ben's 2018 goals. That's your research?

Well, as a well researched bloke that doesn't parrot what others say you'd know that Ben averages 1.6 contested marks a game and 2.2 marks inside 50 a game? Not big numbers for a stay at home full forward? And you'd know that from his nine games last year he didn't take a contested mark in six of them? So which is the true Ben Brown? The one you saw in video highlights  of in 2018 or last season? A similar argument could be used with Tom McDonald who had a great 2018, but we all agree had a shocking year this season. Statistically he was on par with Brown and most Demonlanders wanted him gone.

No where did I say Ben needs the ball on his chest. What I did say was he wasn't particularly strong overhead which is common knowledge among North supporters that watch him every week. What he is good at though is crafting goals through other means.

30 minutes ago, dee-tox said:

Congrats on looking on AFL.com and seeing all of Ben's 2018 goals. That's your research?

Well, as a well researched bloke that doesn't parrot what others say you'd know that Ben averages 1.6 contested marks a game and 2.2 marks inside 50 a game? Not big numbers for a stay at home full forward? And you'd know that from his nine games last year he didn't take a contested mark in six of them? So which is the true Ben Brown? The one you saw in video highlights  of in 2018 or last season? A similar argument could be used with Tom McDonald who had a great 2018, but we all agree had a shocking year this season. Statistically he was on par with Brown and most Demonlanders wanted him gone.

No where did I say Ben needs the ball on his chest. What I did say was he wasn't particularly strong overhead which is common knowledge among North supporters that watch him every week. What he is good at though is crafting goals through other means.

Maybe the real Ben Brown is the one who kicked 180+ goals between 2017 to 2019 3 seasons of 60 + goals, Tmac only had 1 good year, so your going to judge 1 poor year over 3 great ones, his body of work is more the half a season playing injured, he takes lots marks above his head many times over 100 games, so you think just watching 9 games tells you all about a player, that's lazy and pathetic.l

Edited by don't make me angry

4 hours ago, Deemania since 56 said:

Yep, John Lord was a great footballer, too. Another Demon of note with a big heart.

Not great but a very good player. Number 4, if I remember correctly who  went to East Ringwood in the EDFL as it was in the old days. 

On 11/15/2020 at 9:55 PM, dworship said:

"Joke" definition,

  • n.
    Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line.
  • " I suppose it made you guffaw when you made it"
Your reply is what bigots, xenophobes, homophobes and  sexists say when they're challenged.
 
Now if you want to read something that evokes laughter and amusement check out "What they’re saying in Lulie Street", the exchanges between "Trigon", "buck_nekkid and BBO are comedy gold!
 
Wait a minute ..... I might be getting this all "arze about" did you mean the other definition?
n.
Something that is of ludicrously poor quality.

And here we have a “blown out of proportion” type nuffie.

3 hours ago, don't make me angry said:

Maybe the real Ben Brown is the one who kicked 180+ goals between 2017 to 2019 3 seasons of 60 + goals, Tmac only had 1 good year, so your going to judge 1 poor year over 3 great ones, his body of work is more the half a season playing injured, he takes lots marks above his head many times over 100 games, so you think just watching 9 games tells you all about a player, that's lazy and pathetic.l

You're true to you're name Angry, I'll give you that.

Labelling someone as lazy and pathetic because they don't agree with you tells me all I need to know. 


Random question, who was the last player to wear no 50 for us? And is there one player of note who’s worn it?

10 hours ago, dee-tox said:

Congrats on looking on AFL.com and seeing all of Ben's 2018 goals. That's your research?

Well, as a well researched bloke that doesn't parrot what others say you'd know that Ben averages 1.6 contested marks a game and 2.2 marks inside 50 a game? Not big numbers for a stay at home full forward? And you'd know that from his nine games last year he didn't take a contested mark in six of them? So which is the true Ben Brown? The one you saw in video highlights  of in 2018 or last season? A similar argument could be used with Tom McDonald who had a great 2018, but we all agree had a shocking year this season. Statistically he was on par with Brown and most Demonlanders wanted him gone.

No where did I say Ben needs the ball on his chest. What I did say was he wasn't particularly strong overhead which is common knowledge among North supporters that watch him every week. What he is good at though is crafting goals through other means.

60+ goals a season is about 3 per match. If BB is taking 1.6 contested marks per match that means he's likely getting half his goals from contested marks - not too bad eh?

On the other hand if he's taking 2.2 marks inside 50 per game then then about one of his 3 goals isn't coming from a mark.  Maybe from a free or maybe on the run?

In 2019 (full length games) WC Josh Kennedy's numbers were 1.3 CM and 2.9 I50 M for comparison.

 

5 hours ago, Pates said:

Random question, who was the last player to wear no 50 for us? And is there one player of note who’s worn it?

Robert Flower

10 minutes ago, durango said:

Robert Flower

I think Robbie wore 52 then 2?


6 hours ago, Pates said:

Random question, who was the last player to wear no 50 for us? And is there one player of note who’s worn it?

Here you go: http://www.demonwiki.org/Number+50

Whether there are "players of note" is completely subjective, of course, although Neville Jetta did play one game in the #50 in 2017 to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the 1967 Referendum.

On 11/14/2020 at 2:50 AM, special robert said:

Yes, next year the networks are even threatening to cut to an ad break as he starts his runup and then cut back in as he kicks the ball. A ten goal game could add up to as much as an extra 13 minutes of AAMI ads.

For the run up he has been told he is not allowed back past the centre line at the G if he marks the ball inside the 50.

He has asked to be allowed to go as far back as centre half back but this has been nipped in the bud by the coach worried his run up could actually extend all the way back to full back if he is allowed his natural game.

 

8 minutes ago, hardtack said:

 

brilliant. I love the original and subsequent scenes with John Cleese as sir Lancelot

 
On 11/14/2020 at 10:56 PM, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

Watching his highlights, I don't think it will matter if we kick it to him well or not.  He seems to track the ball through the air so well, time his launch and clunk the marks from everywhere, so I think that suits us well.

I think he's one of those who "catch it at its highest point"  :)

 

 

 

joke, I hate that phrase !

Edited by KysaiahMessiah
spelling

Marks per game, tackles, contested marks... don’t care. He kicks lots of goals, he will kick lots of goals for us and is potentially pushing us well into the top 8, even top 4. He had a down year but if he gets back to the previous form we move to a genuine contender. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 11

    Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

      • Thanks
    • 153 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Sydney

    The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Brisbane

    “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Southport

    The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

      • Thanks
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Sydney

    Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

      • Thanks
    • 350 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Brisbane

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 35 replies
    Demonland