Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 hours ago, DeeZee said:

If he gets a haircut and reduces his run up Iā€™d take him.

Nah, the hair is a selling point for me. No hair, no deal.

Ā 

Most pressing external needs imo (shared with many others) are a key forward and another solid winger (while we continue to develop the latter in-house or plug for a year or two - and the trickle-down effect a genuine KPF will deliver toĀ our forward-line).

Have to work out how to juggle that in the immediate-term as to trade cookies and salary cap. Paying up on Brown (for pick ~23 and a sizeable but depressed salary) and bringing in Smith as the two priority players we're most closely connected toĀ in the media suggests the club hasĀ identified what we need in line with the fans and have found the best compromise as targets.Ā 

Ā 

2 hours ago, don't make me angry said:

Cap space where,Ā 

They are in desperate need of a KPF, they'll make room if they have to

 
20 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Second or third round pick seems to be what the article says.

Get it done!

Good to see some Sanity set in at NM, if you push a guy out the door you can't demand the world.Ā 


Take Brown & Polec for aĀ 2nd & 3rd pick, maybe very lucky & 2 3rd round picks.

Gives you a key forward, Weideman then gets 2nd defender & Polec covers other wingman, North paying 30-40% of his salary!

Brown salary probably at $500k, 250k less than start of year.

Good deal for Demons!

Ā 

There is one thing we have to remember with Brown and that is you have to deliver it straight on to his chest. Given our poor forward line disposal there is major risk with this and would have to be worked on.

Also watch out for the filth in all this both with Brown this year or next year with the weed. If we get Brown then both he and the weed would have to work well together.

Ā 
4 minutes ago, dl4e said:

There is one thing we have to remember with Brown and that is you have to deliver it straight on to his chest. Given our poor forward line disposal there is major risk with this and would have to be worked on.

Also watch out for the filth in all this both with Brown this year or next year with the weed. If we get Brown then both he and the weed would have to work well together.

This is why we need isaac Smith as wellĀ 

3 minutes ago, dl4e said:

There is one thing we have to remember with Brown and that is you have to deliver it straight on to his chest.

This is simply not true.Ā  I'm somewhat ambivalent about Brown, but if Clarkson suddenly wanted him I bet the attitude would change around here.Ā  If it was at the end of 2019 and he was wanting out of North there'd be a different sentiment.

Weideman covers a lot of ground and with good coaching the two can play in the same half.

Here's some brief highlights of just 2018 and he gets many goals where he's not hit lace out on a long lead, including a lot in general play.

Ā 


6 hours ago, DeeZee said:

If he gets a haircut and reduces his run up Iā€™d take him.

Nah.. Dennis LILLEE had a HUUUUUGE RUN UP and he went orright!!Ā ?

4 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

A serious Key Forward, pending a full medicalĀ 

Excellent. I donā€™t understand those who are against this

Weid as the 2nd Tall.Ā 
TMac to get fit

Luke Jackson as The Follower...

T Mac goes as part of the deal,, Oh and Oscar can go with him!!

Those 2018 highlights offer COMPELLING evidence that he is not just a lead up forward.

DEES GET THIS DONE FFS

Edited by picket fence

17 minutes ago, picket fence said:

T Mac goes as part of the deal,, Oh and Oscar can go with him!!

Those 2018 highlights offer COMPELLING evidence that he is not just a lead up forward.

DEES GET THIS DONE FFS

????

30 minutes ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

This is simply not true.Ā  I'm somewhat ambivalent about Brown, but if Clarkson suddenly wanted him I bet the attitude would change around here.Ā  If it was at the end of 2019 and he was wanting out of North there'd be a different sentiment.

Weideman covers a lot of ground and with good coaching the two can play in the same half.

Here's some brief highlights of just 2018 and he gets many goals where he's not hit lace out on a long lead, including a lot in general play.

Ā 

Brown in 2018 was excellent. So was Tmac... whose highlights from that year were equally impressive and we can barely give him away now.Ā Ā You donā€™t get rid of a big gun forwardĀ for a second rounderĀ unless something serious has happened to his body. We absolutely need due diligence here. Would way rather an elite outside mid.Ā 

33 minutes ago, picket fence said:

T Mac goes as part of the deal,, Oh and Oscar can go with him!!

Those 2018 highlights offer COMPELLING evidence that he is not just a lead up forward.

DEES GET THIS DONE FFS

TMAC is not worth anything at the moment.Ā 
we are better off keeping him and getting him back in shape

Edited by Sir Why You Little


42 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

geez, that's cheap as chips for a multiple 60+ a year goalkicker who has had one poor year

compare with cameron, he's a positive bargain

Thatā€™s why I would try couple with Polec as North paid $200k OverĀ the odds to get Him, if we can get him at say $400k, then we have Brown/Polec at $800/900K compared to $8-900k Carlton is paying for Williams.

Then I would have a crack at Higgins from the Tigers or someone similar 3 years @ $300 - $350k and the only other spot Iā€™d want extra coverage is perhaps that small defender role.

Then in one hit weā€™ve covered two weaknesses key forward and wing, plus given ourselves an extra option for a small forward and small defender.

With Petracca, Oliver, Viney, Brayshaw and Harmes if used in his rightĀ role, Langdon youā€™ve got a powerful midfield in right age range24-26! Add Max who is 28 going 29 but rucks last longer, plus Jackson as a backup! The other thing I like about Jackson is he is a totally different rucking style to Max, making them a hard rucking combination to match.

Defence, May, Salem, Lever, Rivers, Tomlinson (played a lot better at CHB than wing), with Hibberd, Lockhart and another small defender from one of Giants/Brisbane/Gold Coast/Tigers not getting a crack. Hopefully Petty comes back as a back up defender/swingman.

Yze improves the KickingĀ skills and an improvement in strategy vs opposition, itā€™sĀ a different team.

If Brown kicked 2 per game, add 34 goals or 44 in a normal season, as we got nothing out of 2nd key forward this year, you probably add 10% in percentage and win two more games from that stat alone. Yze sorts out Fritsch to 30-20Ā instead of 22-28. Itā€™s a totally different forward line, Pickett improves and learns to steady, add in a Higgins like forward and our forward line is transformed. Hunt, Spargo, Melksham all have to lift to get a game!

2020 was a fail, but we have a huge potential and a lot of our bestĀ players Are heading into that 24-26!age bracketĀ 100 games plus zone, a few exciting kids, 2021-2025 is our opportunity!

Ā 

44 minutes ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

This is simply not true.Ā  I'm somewhat ambivalent about Brown, but if Clarkson suddenly wanted him I bet the attitude would change around here.Ā  If it was at the end of 2019 and he was wanting out of North there'd be a different sentiment.

Weideman covers a lot of ground and with good coaching the two can play in the same half.

Here's some brief highlights of just 2018 and he gets many goals where he's not hit lace out on a long lead, including a lot in general play.

Ā 

hmmm, not many perfect kicks to his lead in that. Close to zero.Ā 

agree with @D4Life

if we could land polec and brown in the one fell swoop while giving up little it would be just enough rejuvenation and continuation to our list to add something to the mix for 2021

ultimately no idea how we'd afford it without shedding more than preuss, t mac, o mac, not to mention satisfying north as a trade

you wouldn't see two second rounders getting it done; hawks' high second and our future second plus t mac could make the most sense, possibly?

Edited by whatwhatsaywhat

I'd be playing Brown and Jackson in the same side and putting Weideman on the trade table.

10 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

agree with @D4Life

if we could land polec and brown in the one fell swoop while giving up little it would be just enough rejuvenation and continuation to our list to add something to the mix for 2021

ultimately no idea how we'd afford it without shedding more than preuss, t mac, o mac, not to mention satisfying north as a trade

you wouldn't see two second rounders getting it done; hawks' high second and our future second plus t mac could make the most sense, possibly?

North have put themselves in a poor position with both Polec and Brown reĀ trading, as They have openly said they donā€™t want them. Turns Brown maybe a first round pick into 2nd and Polec a 2nd into a 3rd.

Teams seem to want Preuss So that frees up $400k, an OMac goes thatā€™s probably $300k that almost covers Brown and Polec.

Hopefully TMac, Lever and May were somewhat front loaded!


2 minutes ago, A F said:

I'd be playing Brown and Jackson in the same side and putting Weideman on the trade table.

No way all 3 can play in the same side

5 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Port, Geel, Richmond all have one focal point key forward in Dixon, Hawkins and Lynch.Ā 

The secondary talls - Marshall, Stanley and Riewoldt - rarelyĀ touch the ball.Ā 
Ā 

Weid and Brown just wonā€™t work. Letā€™s stick with Weid, use our cap space and draft capital finding guys who can run, kick and pressure to create scoring chances. Zak Butters, Mitch Duncan, Shai Bolton - thatā€™s what we need.Ā 

Rubbish re: Richmond. Riewoldt clearly plays a second tall forward.

Never mind St Kilda (King/Membrey) orĀ West Coast (Kennedy/Darling).

But at any rate, the only side that doesn't play two tall forwards is Geelong. Every other finals side played two key forwards. So who cares if players like Riewoldt or Marshall don't get huge touches. If they take marks and kick goals, then isn't that an upgrade on what we currently have?

Now, in saying that, TMac could give us what we're seeking in Brown. I don't see the need for us to take Brown if we're going to keep TMac. It's one or the other for me, and I'll be happy either way.

1 hour ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

This is simply not true.Ā  I'm somewhat ambivalent about Brown, but if Clarkson suddenly wanted him I bet the attitude would change around here.Ā  If it was at the end of 2019 and he was wanting out of North there'd be a different sentiment.

Weideman covers a lot of ground and with good coaching the two can play in the same half.

Here's some brief highlights of just 2018 and he gets many goals where he's not hit lace out on a long lead, including a lot in general play.

Agree with the whole post but the bolded bit in particular resonates.

If we get him i think we start looking at West coast or Brisbane structures with 2 big key forwards and then the third being the second ruck. We would be doing alright if we could perform like them.

Ā 
2 minutes ago, Wunders said:

If we get him i think we start looking at West coast or Brisbane structures with 2 big key forwards and then the third being the second ruck. We would be doing alright if we could perform like them.

100% this. Brown and Weid as legit key forwards who provide a contest and hit the scoreboard.Ā Jacko as a roaming mobile third tall whose time is split between forward line and ruck. Give him license to roam up the ground as a marking option along the wing and work back inside 50. Would be a great setup and 100% can work with the right players. Wouldnā€™t work with say a Pruess roaming instead of Jacko.

1 hour ago, dl4e said:

There is one thing we have to remember with Brown and that is you have to deliver it straight on to his chest. Given our poor forward line disposal there is major risk with this and would have to be worked on.

Fritsch gets plenty of looks at goal and he doesnā€™t crash packs


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sundayā€™s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullartonā€™s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Caseyā€™s three matches and, with Melbourneā€™s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next weekā€™s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forwardā€™s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasnā€™t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the teamā€™s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourneā€™s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season.Ā There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight.Ā Since that game, the Demonsā€™ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where theyā€™ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 209 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ā€˜G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sundayā€™s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Thanks
    • 273 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Geelong

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Thanks
    • 56 replies
    Demonland