I was at the game but forgot to tape it.

Pedersen's bump in the goal square didn't look good at the game but i don't have the benefit of a TV replay.

Any concerns ?

I replayed it a few times and it looked to me like he made contact with the Saints player's shoulder. 

I reckon he's gone. Which is a massive shame because he's making a reasonable fist of it at the moment. 

It hit his shoulder 

Wouldn't surprise me if he gets a week

Commentators made no mention of it whatsoever and they're usually pretty good at that.

You watch Pedo will be rubbed out and Cameron will get off

I reckon initial contact was with with shoulder (which took the brunt of the impact) but slid up for low impact to the head.  Careless at worst.

One week 

 

if he gets a week for that Jeremy Cameron should get 5

32 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Commentators made no mention of it whatsoever and they're usually pretty good at that.

Radio coverage mentioned it a fair bit. SEN saying he will miss at least the first round.

 

I thought it was a fair bumb, the ball was right in front of him, first contact was the shoulder and low contact would be overstating it, if he gets weeks for that it may as well be a non contact sport

 

Contact was clearly to the Saint's shoulder, the Saint having bent forward as Pedo went to bump him.  No head contact. The 'victim' was uninjured  

But being a MFC player he will go for 1 or maybe 2

 

I also thought the Saints player made it look a lot worse than it was, playing for the free kick.

Yes, he is in trouble. Largely because of the lottery system underlying the MRP. Anything could happen.

I can still remember Moloney getting 2 weeks for NOT hitting someone!

2 minutes ago, Ted Fidge said:

Yes, he is in trouble. Largely because of the lottery system underlying the MRP. Anything could happen.

I can still remember Moloney getting 2 weeks for NOT hitting someone!

that'll teach him to miss.

It looked like he intentionally went to bump and got the player in the head so that will probably be a week only because there wasn't any injury to the other player otherwise it would be longer.

2-3 weeks.

Might be hard to fit both he and Frost in anyway and whilst both offered something I doubt either nailed a spot today. Might save the coaches from a tricky decision. 

His biggest problem is that he clearly took his eye off the ball and focused on the player.

probably get a week

4 hours ago, ILLDieADemon said:

It looked like he intentionally went to bump and got the player in the head so that will probably be a week only because there wasn't any injury to the other player otherwise it would be longer.

 

2 hours ago, Hellfish said:

His biggest problem is that he clearly took his eye off the ball and focused on the player.

probably get a week

Only if they use the Moloney precedent- 2 weeks for not hitting the head.

Look again, ILLD:. Contact was to the shoulder.  

Hit under the shoulder which forced the arm upwards and made it look high.

Will get off.

Or I'll bake Stuie a kilo of hash cookies.

Pedos last quarter was inspiring.

7 hours ago, Hellfish said:

His biggest problem is that he clearly took his eye off the ball and focused on the player.

probably get a week

Agreed. He clearly took his eye off the ball and this could cost him

If we lose Pederson for one week and GWS lose Cameron, we still will be better off. Not having him as well as the loss of McCarthy will be a massive loss for their forward potency. 

1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Agreed. He clearly took his eye off the ball and this could cost him

why the [censored] would you keep your eye on the ball when you are going to bump someone. crazy statement