It’s sorted then. We all agree.

No Humphrey. No Tracc.

Let’s go.

IMO the only way BH comes to us is if he nominates us and says he wants to move to vic for family reasons otherwise it will end up being draft pics 🤮 cause I don’t think trac is walking back into the club.

Lamb has said it has to be a head turning deal to obtain Trac.

For me picks 7&8 in this draft don't move my head at all. Would prefer grumpy Trac back.

Bailey Humphrey on the other hand has me going full Linda Blair from The Exorcist.

8 hours ago, DubDee said:

Can someone upload a gif of the guy who rapped 'Do the Humpty Hump' in the 90s please?

It would mean a lot to me.

Your thinking of Shock G and his alter ego Humpty Hump from the hip hop band Digital Underground.

16 minutes ago, Go the Biff said:

Bailey Humphrey on the other hand has me going full Linda Blair from The Exorcist.

Brilliant.

21 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

Many would argue that pick 17 in last year’s draft had a better year (in his first season) than Humphrey had last year.

Statistically similar years in many ways.

Pick 8 in last year's draft could have got us Tootsie.

Is he Trac tradable material?

As good as JT is, there's also a fair element of luck about the draft I recon. That's where trading Trac a player of established senior capabilities at AFL level for BH of similarly established capabilities, be it somewhat less established, but in a younger body is a more reasonable trade than dipping into the draft. Particularly in a weak draft year, where there could be plenty of Tootsies.

1 minute ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

Brilliant.

Just thought we all needed a visual on that

At the end of the day what deal will we get the most out of going forward

1. Bailey Humphrey he is young and a very good player

2. Petracca for 4 years is still good and we know exactly what he brings

3. 2 draft picks in an unknown draft best case scenario we get 2 stars but could just as easily get 2 duds that would be delisted by the time Petracca finishes up at the suns

So when you think about it if option 1 doesn’t work out I would rather keep petracca

2 hours ago, Gator said:

Do you think you speak for everyone not keen on 7 & 8 ?

I'm one of them and he speaks for me

1 hour ago, M_9 said:

It's been explained, at least once on this board, that the Hawks have nothing to give other than picks, which the Suns don't want/need. Certainly no player of the calibre of Petracca.

But if those picks helped land them Petracca by on-trading them to us then they do want/need them.

59 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

Pick 8 in last year's draft could have got us Tootsie.

Is he Trac tradable material?

As good as JT is, there's also a fair element of luck about the draft I recon. That's where trading Trac a player of established senior capabilities at AFL level for BH of similarly established capabilities, be it somewhat less established, but in a younger body is a more reasonable trade than dipping into the draft. Particularly in a weak draft year, where there could be plenty of Tootsies.

I reckon throw in Jibba as a sweetener to get Humphreys across the line.

Why do we need to include pick 24 in a deal to trade Trac?

If Humphrey is included in this deal then 24 and a pick 42.

Trac, pick 24 and pick 42.

for pick 7,8 and Humphrey.

More than fair GC get their points for NGA and we set ourselves up before Tassie come in.

Edited yesterday at 13:441 day by YesitwasaWin4theAges

2 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

Why do we need to include pick 24 in a deal to trade Trac?

If Humphrey is included in this deal then 24 and a pick 38.

Trac, pick 24 and pick 38

for pick 7,8 and Humphrey.

More than fair GC get their points for NGA and we set ourselves up before Tassie come in.

Just take Humphrey and swap picks for the same points as pick 7

Can we wait for him to nominate us before working out what a good deal is?

I can't go through another Windhager and Flanders...

4 hours ago, Demon Disciple said:

No wonder we are going backwards, we’re failing our own philosophies.

Where what Bing has posted is all against our philosophies DD? Explain please.

40 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

Just take Humphrey and swap picks for the same points as pick 7

We are trading out a generational player who has 4 years on a contract who is going to market their club.

With all due respects What has Bailey Humphrey's done? How many Brownlow votes, Norm Smith's medals or Premierships has he got?

I think alot of people are missing the point here if GC want mainstream relevance they are going to have to pay a price for it.

Remember pick 7 and 8 will become pick 12 and 17 with all the nga and Father son picks.

pick 7&8 + Humphrey's

for

Tracc, 24 and 42

I think this is a very, very fair trade based on player standing and relevance in the game.

Edited yesterday at 13:441 day by YesitwasaWin4theAges

1 hour ago, chookrat said:

I reckon throw in Jibba as a sweetener to get Humphreys across the line.

who or what is a jibba?

3 hours ago, M_9 said:

It's been explained, at least once on this board, that the Hawks have nothing to give other than picks, which the Suns don't want/need.

If the Suns lose 7 & 8 for Petracca, they'll need picks.

Though that's not the point. If Humphrey wants out and then nominates the Hawks, the Suns and Hawks will have to thrash out a deal. Which will be picks.

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

who or what is a jibba?

Exactly. I'm still stuck on skibidi toilet.

We are in a rebuild folks. Whether it's Humphrey or not, we need to get rid of Tracc and Olly. Should have done so last year. We aint contending now. Let's just take them to market.

9 hours ago, joeboy said:

Too much water under the bridge on this site for me to check through if it’s been mentioned, but John Ralph said yesterday that there are ‘personal reasons’ for BH wanting to return to Melbourne ( the city ) and hopefully those reasons aren’t just about the money.

Apparently an ill family member.

3 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

We are trading out a generational player who has 4 years on a contract who is going to market their club.

With all due respects What has Bailey Humphrey's done? How many Brownlow votes, Norm Smith's medals or Premierships has he got?

I think alot of people are missing the point here if GC want mainstream relevance they are going to have to pay a price for it.

Remember pick 7 and 8 will become pick 12 and 17 with all the nga and Father son picks.

pick 7&8 + Humphrey's

for

Tracc, 24 and 42

I think this is a very, very fair trade based on player standing and relevance in the game.

Like many on here, I think you’re in for a VERY rude shock.

18 hours ago, Mouseymoo said:

I seriously hope pick #24 isn't on the table!

To get 7/8 it is — they need the points and it’s. a heck of a lot better than 6 & 15 that was muted earlier.. draft isn’t deep, 7+8 ain’t Humphrey but it’s solid & can be used well or turned into something even better potentially! JT will have his targets & in JT I wholeheartedly trust.

I have a gut feeling this is sorted out today. Either he requests a trade to VIC or us, or he and his management firmly shut it down and we get shafted in a trade.