1 hour ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

I’m more referring to the emblem itself and comparing it to our current club emblem.

I like the jersey though as a clash jumper.

I like our current one as well, simple and classic but i'm not against a bit of variety on the logo on certain kits. Understand there are some financial ramifications here as well though. 

One thing some soccer clubs have been doing is changing emblem on different kits, as seen below Manchester United having full crest on Home (pictured) and Away kit but a special logo on the 3rd strip . 

Are we still using the royal blue as our clash?

Would be more than happy if we changed it to last weekend's jumper.

 

 

i think the retro m red clash guernsey is only being worn for the preseason, isn't it?

the colour tv royal blue remains our clash top?

I think I prefer this. No matter who we play. 👹

2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Never liked that 90’s emblem…

These 2 were heaps better 

Wasn’t alive for the top one, love the bottom one.

The only thing the current logo lacks is some reference to the Demons in my view. Something like a subtle pitch fork as an additional would be the a great compliment. 

 

Someone made this 10 years ago. Don't think the demon is perfect but it's not bad.

 

Swap that demon with this! 

5 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Never liked that 90’s emblem…

These 2 were heaps better 

I find that bottom one a bit camp tbh. Which isn’t to say I don’t like it, just that I think it belongs in the past. 
 

I’m very much for our current logo for official/corporate type stuff (but also available on some merchandise) and the flaming demon as a mascot type logo. I think both could be used very effectively.

5 hours ago, Palace Dees said:

Is this what we are talking about?

Not a fan of that emblem at all

Looks amateur imo

Can we please have a tedious back and forth about the difference between a logo and an emblem? Approx. 70 pages worth. 

Thanks

rp

Edited February 28Feb 28 by rpfc

12 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Not a fan of that emblem at all

Looks amateur imo

I think it could be re-vamped though to make it more modern, but use similar style. 

5 hours ago, demoncat said:

Bring back “Give Em Hell” while we’re at it 

Don’t forget “Tooheys Blue - All fired up”. Get them back on board

1 hour ago, kurtneverdied said:

Swap that demon with this! 

Well, there goes the religious supporters...

This was always my favourite 

I'd like to return to the 90s-2000 emblem as our official logo for non-formal occasions, scoreboard and TV graphics, and so on.

The monogram should be used for formal stuff like Best and Fairest events and the like.

No emblem should be on our jumper (with the exception of training and pre-season stuff).

In official games for premiership points (or finals), we wear the navy blue and red yoke + sponsor stuff, or royal blue and red yoke in the case of a clash.

Edited February 28Feb 28 by Chook

I've always been a big fan of the 90s emblem, as can be seen from my display picture 😁

current one is excellent

schwab's monstrosity was horrific

7 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Never liked that 90’s emblem…

These 2 were heaps better 

Outdated and the second is Not even  our real colours. Navy blue more than some royal style is our colours.

And haven’t we won the 2021 flag with this newer emblem. 

Let's worry about what happens on the field and matters like this can be addressed when we are 17 flags atop the premiership race. 

Changing emblems like flags always indicates a lack  of self confidence IMO as the real issue is changing our style out on the ground and winning.

That makes a greater Football Club with continuity and confidence not tinkering at the edges. 

 

♥️

11 hours ago, rpfc said:

Can we please have a tedious back and forth about the difference between a logo and an emblem? Approx. 70 pages worth. 

Thanks

rp

Thought you'd be leading the charge campaigning for the flaming Demon rpfc 😉

Do like the idea of our main logo having the Demon on it somewhere and the flaming Demon logo is probably the best, most contemporary looking one, only I'd probably loose or rework somehow the white diagonalised "Melbourne" on the bottom, but still somehow work the word in there.  Maybe just changing the Melbourne to navvy blue would look more contemporary.

I'm a bit conflicted about the MFC monogram.  Think it can look classy on formal wear, but on the other hand, it reminds me too much of Carlton's jumper and monogram to be overly enthusiastic about it.

The current logo is brilliant in its simplicity. However, we should be using a Demon more often, particularly when targeting our younger fans. 

12 minutes ago, Dannyz said:

The current logo is brilliant in its simplicity. However, we should be using a Demon more often, particularly when targeting our younger fans. 

Yep my kids think our logo is one of the most boring in the logo. Need a Demon in the logo particularly for marketing to kids.

19 hours ago, demoncat said:

I’ve been saying this amongst other Dees supporters for years now - far and away the best emblem we’ve ever had 

Plus retro is very much in vogue these days - I reckon you could reintroduce it with some minor touch ups and it wouldn’t look dated at all 

Bring back “Give Em Hell” while we’re at it 

I must say “Demon Spirit” is absolute rubbish. Done to death now. Was hoping for something new this year. 
 

Would also love a new emblem. Love the MFC badge but everything else about it is no good.