Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

No thanks.

Where would he fit in? I feel he is an inferior version of  Oliver, so why would we even bother?

I'd rather move Rivers into more midfield rotation and backfill a HB role.

 

A person I don’t like talking about a player I don’t care for, from a club I hate.

Remember how divided Demonland was when we had to choose between him and Clarrie.

I'd say if we can fit him in, we should try.


I'm in the minority but like him.

Clearance machine and on the quicker side for an inside mid. His lack of versatility a bit of a concern though.

We need midfielders who kick goals.

 

He does not

Underrated as a stoppage player and provides midfield run which we’d like. Ball use isn’t great.


There’s a point at which he becomes a value buy for free on a reasonable contract. If he comes as a free agent on 5 x 600k that might be close to that point.

We could play an extra mid in the current side and rotate them through the forwards more. 

Otherwise the easiest way to fit him in is to move Gus to a wing or half back. Or use Tracc as a near permanent forward in home and away seasons. Plus take the load off Viney.

Overall though he’d have to be even cheaper than the current price I think. Because we need that cap space to go after talls, mid/forward polish and outside run.

Even if those options aren’t available right now it’s probably better to hold the space for a year.

 

Out - Harmes? Jordon? Dunstan?

In - Parish?

  • Demonland changed the title to The Darcy Parish Thread

He’s a ‘bread & butter’ footballer.  We should target players with some honey or jam on top.

I rate him, but I'm not sure how he fits into our midfield, let alone the salary cap question.

I really don’t see how we need another inside player even with our best one out injured for 10 weeks the midfield was still brutal in that aspect

1 minute ago, sisso said:

I really don’t see how we need another inside player even with our best one out injured for 10 weeks the midfield was still brutal in that aspect

I think it's the breakaway pace that Parish has, IMO, that would be attractive and different for our midfield, but I think he'd have to get way better defensively if we was to get a game with us, and who does he replace in midfield?


37 minutes ago, Binmans PA said:

I rate him, but I'm not sure how he fits into our midfield, let alone the salary cap question.

Salary cap probably covered if Grundy leaves? And a potential Hibberd/Melksham retirement?

I don't think he's really what we need, I'd prefer some guys with polish/elite kicking skills but he would be an upgrade on a guy like Jordon (who couldn't really crack it in our best 22 anyway).

  • Author

Maybe I'm on my own, but I don't mind this at all.

He's a massive accumulator of the footy so we'd have no issues generating clearences and and getting first hands on the footy.

Does this free up the likes of Oliver and Petracca to spend even more time up forward so they're not crashing and bashing their bodies?

He comes free without giving up a draft pick up.

He's an All Australian midfielder as well so there's certainly class and talent there.

Edited by dazzledavey36

12 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Salary cap probably covered if Grundy leaves? And a potential Hibberd/Melksham retirement?

I don't think he's really what we need, I'd prefer some guys with polish/elite kicking skills but he would be an upgrade on a guy like Jordon (who couldn't really crack it in our best 22 anyway).

It depends if we want to spend the salary cap on another mid or if we want to spend it on a KPF to support Petty and JVR.

Whately the other day described Parish as a “nice footballer and that’s about it”. He also said that Parish’s management need to have a long, hard look at themselves if they are advising him to knock back the reported 5 years @ $650,000

I agree and don’t want him at the Dees on that sort of contract 


Take him would allow us to go grab skilful flankers and talls from the draft 

2 minutes ago, layzie said:

Remember the bees to the honey pot argument? How does this help?

By replacing one bee with a better bee

 
35 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Essendon fans I know bemoan the quality of his disposal, even if he does get a lot of touches.

Sounds like Melbourne fans with ANB. 😄

AA mids don’t grow on trees, I’d take him.

He’s certainly got no problem finding the ball and if we can compliment that with the better kicks coming through, it’s a good result

Melbourne fans love to heap praise on Trac and Clarry, plus to a lesser extent Viney. None of them are good users of the ball.

Trac’s fumbles and wayward kicking sometimes have to be seen to be believed

Edited by BW511


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Haha
    • 57 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Haha
    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Sad
    • 40 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Haha
    • 546 replies