Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 minutes ago, Deespicable said:

It's hard not to be fearful of what might happen in this game.

Clearly, based on the Blues recent tales of self-destruction, we win easily. Cripps seems injured (slower than normal), Harry has the yips and Charlie is finding the burden of being the No.1 player in the game (Robbo's view) hard to live up to. Add in the injuries and it's hard not to back us and just about every tipster in the country is.

But those who remember Joe Daniher destroying us on a couple of occasions (and losing the plot in a  couple of others) know that this could be the night when Harry converts his first on Tomlinson and gets on a roll. Given we aren't playing hard tags (Harmes is out of favour) it could also be the night that Cripps gets rolling (unless Sparrow has a blinder on him). And it's not as if their injuries are key omissions - their six out are all depth players replaced by in-form VFL depth players. Their midfield core of Walsh, Cerra and Cripps are all playing so Charlie may have enough supply, while Saad and Docherty are still in to provide run and Weitering, McGovern and Young good enough to quell our key forwards.

What worries me most is that, under Goody, we continue to play four small forwards and with no major height through the middle aside from Trac, we get picked off whenever we try switchbacks from our left-side defensive forays.

I don't understand how we can continue to play four small forwards - we are the only side doing it and aside from a few magic forays from Kozzie and the early form of Chandler, the benefits of the structure are non-existent. And the goals have dried up recently. Chandler has kicked one goal in his past three, ANB one in the past four and Spargo nine for the year.

It's not as if they are smalls that take the odd surprise mark or are that we get benefits from their tackles. Yes they all work their butt off but who would you rather tackle you - Beau McCreery, Sam Powell-Pepper, Zac Bailey or Chandler, Spargo and ANB. Which is not to say that our trio don't work their butts off - it just that at 175c, 172cm, 182cm plus Kozzie at 171cm our small forwards aren't intimidating. And that is one of the major reasons why we have absolutely no chance against Collingwood, although Carlton's current propensity to self-destruct should enable us to get through tonight.   

You've earnt an Elephant stamp for excellence. 

A very decent appraisal of our malaise. 

Crossed fingers and toes for tonight 

 

In: A.Cincotta, Le.Young, J.Silvagni, Z.Fisher, L.O'Brien

Honestly... a loss tonight would deeply test my belief in our seriousness for 2023.

Also, we're not going to lose.

2 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Start drinking early is always the preferred option fd !

 

Game starts at 4.50pm up here in Bangers. The late night starts are absurd. Alot of people will get drunk to relieve the boredom and tension(mfc) . Too much waiting around imho. Some wont get home till well after midnight when all the goblins and ghouls come out to feast.

No problem for Tricky Gill. His house is only minutes away from the G assuming he hasnt already jetted off 1st class to Europe for the summer.

Thats nice dear.

Edited by Deebauched

 
11 hours ago, FireInTheBennelly said:

download(2).jpeg.e65a6d480dd89a567a3e1a32faf1c8a7.jpeg

I’m almost certain you had other images in mind. 

Sorry I can only see a loss. Our forward line is [censored]. Curnow will be pulling on his jumper all night. 

We need Petty back in the side and at CHF.


26 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

Game starts at 4.50pm up here in Bangers. The late night starts are absurd. Alot of people will get drunk to relieve the boredom and tension(mfc) . Too much waiting around imho. Some wont get home till well after midnight when all the goblins and ghouls come out to feast.

No problem for Tricky Gill. His house is only minutes away from the G assuming he hasnt already jetted off 1st class to Europe for the summer.

Thats nice dear.

What venue will you be watching from Deebauched?

Edited by Bitter but optimistic
typo

Losing Hibberd hurts us given he's one of our guys who attacks the contest the right way. Harmes and McDonald out should theoretically help our contest, although our depth is looking very concerning when Smith and Tomlinson are now both in the side. Hunter also a net negative for our chance of putting up a decent effort if tested in the physicality stakes.

Simply can't see us winning without Oliver if Carlton bring the heat physically...hopefully they don't (or we go back to applying pressure like we did for a fleeting period a few years back, in which case we'd be fine).

Just realised Paddy Dow has been left out again… Given the injuries the Blues have I find it very strange. Would he compliment our midfield as a trade prospect next year? 

 
8 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

What venue will you be watching from Deebauched?

There's a few bars and pubs along Sukhumvit rd in the Nana district that show AFL. I dont go anymore too old to put up with pesky bar girls and bar stool bogans trying to explain to foreigners that aussie rules is not an Australian game but Irish. I rarely drink in public in Bangkok.  Listen live on SEN on the iphone. Plenty of footy replays post game online.

10 minutes ago, Demonsterative said:

Just realised Paddy Dow has been left out again… Given the injuries the Blues have I find it very strange. Would he compliment our midfield as a trade prospect next year? 

I've thought about it, he's playing some very good footy in the VFL. 


12 minutes ago, Demonsterative said:

Just realised Paddy Dow has been left out again… Given the injuries the Blues have I find it very strange. Would he compliment our midfield as a trade prospect next year? 

good vfl-level player

he's as big a bust as toumpas

Have a sick feeling about this one and Carlton might pull one out the bag.

 

1 hour ago, Newport34 said:

I can see JVR drawing two defenders and Smith flying in front of the pack taking marks. 

Ive seen VFL highlights over the past few weeks he can take a pack mark and kick truely something we have been missing for a long time.

Joel has a high leap, and is quick over the ground.

Hope he has seen the last of his injury worries and he can compete and make himself a nuisance for Carlton’s backline.

Go Dees.

Whilst many lament the thought of us running McKay into form what about those relishing the prospect of Carlton running us into form and Smith kicking 3-4 and showing he might just have something. A little tweak here and a little tweak there and we're up and about like its 2021! Go Dee's.

I think I've got something seriously wrong with me. Within 12 hours of a match I just can't see us losing, it's happened all my life. In the past reality would strike early in the game, nowadays it comes later!

11 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

There's a few bars and pubs along Sukhumvit rd in the Nana district that show AFL. I dont go anymore too old to put up with pesky bar girls and bar stool bogans trying to explain to foreigners that aussie rules is not an Australian game but Irish. I rarely drink in public in Bangkok.  Listen live on SEN on the iphone. Plenty of footy replays post game online.

Have you tried Fitzpatrick's up the plaza end of Sukhumvit. Usually not too crowded and no bar girls only waitresses?

Good food too!


1 hour ago, Deespicable said:

What worries me most is that, under Goody, we continue to play four small forwards and with no major height through the middle 

I don't understand how we can continue to play four small forwards - we are the only side doing it and aside from a few magic forays from Kozzie and the early form of Chandler, the benefits of the structure are non-existent. And the goals have dried up recently. Chandler has kicked one goal in his past three, ANB one in the past four and Spargo nine for the year.

It's not as if they are smalls that take the odd surprise mark or are that we get benefits from their tackles. Yes they all work their butt off but who would you rather tackle you - Beau McCreery, Sam Powell-Pepper, Zac Bailey or Chandler, Spargo and ANB. Which is not to say that our trio don't work their butts off - it just that at 175c, 172cm, 182cm plus Kozzie at 171cm our small forwards aren't intimidating. 

Goody's finally recognised that not playing a third tall (ie; usually Petty but also Tomo or Disco) is to the detriment of our team defence & defence in general by having Lever play on the oppo's 2nd best tall.

So a big tick on this front to Goody & Co 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

But will def need Petty to go back once fit imv unless a medium tall (like Disco instead of Tomo) is able to cover some oppo smaller forward lines.  Then maybe the odd foray forward for Petty but even then only IF needed.

Don't know which plays what part of the ground more as a forward but whoever plays higher up more of the time out of Curnow & McKay, that's who we need Tomo to go to imv.  Away from goals Tomo's a much better proposition than playing deep where he often ends up in the road of other defenders or a bit of panic sets in resulting in the odd clanger goal.

The 3 small forwards and one small/medium in ANB.  I'm not sure why we are persisting either.

We would be much better served with BBB as the big leading tall and Smith as the 3rd medium tall starting closer to  goal but leading to diff areas in cohesion with JVR.

That means one of ANB or Chandler out to fit BB.

ANB was an important cog here in 2021 being our No.1 rated tackler averaging 1.9 tackles a game.  Dropped away since to be ranked 7th with 0.7 tackles a game.

Chandler presently ranked 3rd behind Kozzy (2.1) & JVR (1.3) averaging 1.2

While no doubt a long way off his early form Chandler also has the higher goal average at 1.4 vs ANB 0.6 (pretty much his usual ave here).

Chandler also has a few more score involvements averaging 4.9 vs 4.1

Less turnovers 2.2 vs 3.1

More marks i50   1 vs 0.3

Seemingly cleaner with the ball running @ 79% vs 74% but a tad less involved averaging 9.7 effective disposals vs 11.6

ANB having a slight edge in One Percenters 1.4 vs 1 

And meters gained 282 vs 176 (although im guessing Chandler plays a bit deeper more of the time).

Buttom line i like the idea of Smith in for a trial run but shouldve been for one of Chandler or ANB for BB as well.  Probably the latter.

Smith will hopefully hit the scoreboard and provide some solid leads to more dangerous places and separate from the likes of Fritsch when he does.  His two big question marks for mine.... playing out a full 4 quarters and pressure inside 50 having laid zero tackles here in his minimal forays over recent times.  Maybe this was what the FD were looking for at Casey as much as his ability to score and he started clicking lately hence the call up.  Hope so as we can ill afford to be bringing less pressure inside 50.

Of note is that in season 2021 Viney was our third highest rated tackler inside 50 averaging 1.58 behind ANB 1.91 & Kozzy 1.65

Dropped right away to 15th now with only 0.5 a match.  Probably indicating he's playing a lot less time forward?  Although hitting the scoreboard a little more often this season averaging 0.5 vs 2021 0.3   Hard to know without looking at a heat map etc.

What i would like to see here though is bring Dunstan in as the 2nd specialist extractor to assist Viney.  Would allow Viney to rest forward more often, hopefully alowing him to help up the pressure for us inside 50 a little closer to 2021 levels.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

If Smith takes 6 marks with 3 in the 50 then he's done his job.

A couple contested would he nice too.

1 hour ago, jnrmac said:

Silvagni has a surprisingly good record against us. I recall he kicked 3 against us recently when playing ruck/fwd.

Setterfield, Docherty also seem to play well against us,.

When Silvagni has kicked goals against us it's been when he's been a full time forward, I think last year was the first he rucked and he got one easy goal, but Max dominated him. Hopefully they'll drag him deep as much as possible when he's rucking. In fact I'd really love both Max and Grundy to play as close to 90% game time each as possible, I know Max normally does but Grundy's only been around the 70%, really stretch their ruck pairing. 

23 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

There's a few bars and pubs along Sukhumvit rd in the Nana district that show AFL. I dont go anymore too old to put up with pesky bar girls and bar stool bogans trying to explain to foreigners that aussie rules is not an Australian game but Irish. I rarely drink in public in Bangkok.  Listen live on SEN on the iphone. Plenty of footy replays post game online.

Have you considered an international membership? It includes access to the watchafl app/site so you can watch live and replays on demand. Goes well.


1 hour ago, SPC said:

I am normally pretty level with emotions and perspective, but have probably had more ups and downs the last few weeks. My view is that we are slow to address areas of concern and back our system- when I think we should be adapting to trends that are unfolding in the game..

All that aside, I am going to try and put my positive hat on.. 

Dees to win tonight, start to build form and upset the Pies next week. Joel Smith to finally get his body right and build a block of form over 6 weeks to prove he belongs. Back talls to click and again establish themselves as the best defensive unit in the comp. 
Hopefully positivity brings positive results!!

Good post from a can of fruit

1 hour ago, jnrmac said:

Silvagni has a surprisingly good record against us. I recall he kicked 3 against us recently when playing ruck/fwd.

Setterfield, Docherty also seem to play well against us,.

Silvagni is slower than his old man and even slower than his Grandfather when he played!

32 minutes ago, layzie said:

I've thought about it, he's playing some very good footy in the VFL. 

Just had a read up on his bio. Strong tall-ish inside midfielder with good burst speed. Question Mask on his kicking.. he could be an upgrade on Harmes and JJ who look gawn at the end of year. 

 

If we lose this, there’s going to be a MASSIVE spotlight on us.  After 2021, Demons dynasty was being proclaimed.  Now we’d be lucky to make the 8 if we lose tonight.  Form is a volatile mistress !!! 

i’m up in Shep for reasons that escape me

on my 3rd pot at the local establishment. quaddies have been put on and dumb footy bets are on. 

when’s the bounce???


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 137 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies