Jump to content

Featured Replies

My bad mood continues after Fridays loss, and more so that it was Gawn getting done over by Port again, that I have been bleating about since 2019. Anyway Salem was an amazingly good return, am thinking he can really help after a successful return. I am keen to see where we go with this. Tmac has the same problem as Melks, lack of forward defensive pressure, don’t want him in the side, even if he brings ball to ground we’re still getting opened up. No BBB either thanks.

Gawn and JVR as sole big forwards, till Petty is back, Gawn instructed to kick for goal if 40/50 out he’s been doubting himself, I remember in 2022 when he had 3 weeks in a row of outside 50m goals. I was a bit dark with how many shots he has been laying off.

Pickett will come good, not worried about him, likewise ANB, a bad week, has been having an excellent season. Brayshaw to the middle or wing. Hibbered and Salem in the side no need for Brayshaw back. Am feeling like Hunter will get off. I also think with Oliver out there is space for Brayshaw and he is smarter than Sparrow.

Not sure about Bowey, I am worried needs to put some speed(flatten) on his kicks, folks are too much under pressure when they receive from him

I want Rivers floating as a high half forward. I think he’s better having a ping at goal than Brayshaw.

Question - How did Tomlinson play, does he have his lateral mobility back yet?

 

Tomlinson again was very good last week in VFL. With Petty out, clubs are now making Lever accountable for 2nd tall forward which reduces his intercept ability. I’d be tempted to play Tomlinson in the next  3 weeks to free up Lever.  Especially v Blues with Curnow and Mckay (Tomlinson on McKay). 

Feel this is an opportunity for some youth and enthusiasm to come into the team.  Senior players seemed to celebrate with genuine joy Judd’s explores earlier in the year.  
Would love to see any or all of Howes, Woey or even Disco or Laurie back in the lineup.

 

 

Need more pace on the ball. Freo beat Geelong by playing Collingwood style attack. If we play slow attack and a slow zone defence, we will get done. 

I also noticed at the game on Friday night we don't seem to defend at all at centre bounces. If we don't win it the other team walks out the opposite way 10 steps and easy kick to a leading forward. It seemed to happen every time they won clearance, whereas when we won clearance it was a pressured kick forwards or sideways. 

Mids need to defend half of the time.


21 hours ago, Roost it far said:

OUT: Oliver

IN: Sparrow

Harmes as sub

That's my guess

Harmes or JJ

Harmes tried to do a Viney and break tackles when playing for Casey on the weekend. It worked for him a few weeks back but was not great on Saturday against North

Harmes in to tag Serong

Kozzie stay inside 50 with the instruction to be a BBB feet all game

Brayshaw is back to the wing

Sparrow all game on the ball

Smith to tag Schutlz (always gets away from us)

Petracca stay perm HF.

Get a defensive first-minded player starting in the middle. Have to do with the form of Darcy and Jackson.

Coaching panel to try something different ONCE!

3 minutes ago, inanunda said:

Harmes in to tag Serong

Kozzie stay inside 50 with the instruction to be a BBB feet all game

Brayshaw is back to the wing

Sparrow all game on the ball

Smith to tag Schutlz (always gets away from us)

Petracca stay perm HF.

Get a defensive first-minded player starting in the middle. Have to do with the form of Darcy and Jackson.

Coaching panel to try something different ONCE!

So for yours

IN: Harmes, Brown, Sparrow, Smith

Presuming at least two of Clayton, Fritta and/or Hunter are out. Who else you got coming out? Whose sub?

I can't imagine you will ever see Trac permanently at HF unless he's carrying an injury maybe. He almost single handidly got us back into the game and almost won it for us last week playing on ball. He's our second leading clearance winner and most lethal/creative at stoppages. Understand he's spending more time forward which is great but in the heat of game we need him in the middle. Friday night was a perfect example.

 
5 minutes ago, Young Blood said:

So for yours

IN: Harmes, Brown, Sparrow, Smith

Presuming at least two of Clayton, Fritta and/or Hunter are out. Who else you got coming out? Whose sub?

I can't imagine you will ever see Trac permanently at HF unless he's carrying an injury maybe. He almost single handidly got us back into the game and almost won it for us last week playing on ball. He's our second leading clearance winner and most lethal/creative at stoppages. Understand he's spending more time forward which is great but in the heat of game we need him in the middle. Friday night was a perfect example.

Yep, especially in that 3rd quarter his two centre clearances were so good. 

31 minutes ago, inanunda said:

Harmes in to tag Serong

Kozzie stay inside 50 with the instruction to be a BBB feet all game

Brayshaw is back to the wing

Sparrow all game on the ball

Smith to tag Schutlz (always gets away from us)

Petracca stay perm HF.

Get a defensive first-minded player starting in the middle. Have to do with the form of Darcy and Jackson.

Coaching panel to try something different ONCE!

I doubt much of any of this will occur


39 minutes ago, inanunda said:

Harmes in to tag Serong

Kozzie stay inside 50 with the instruction to be a BBB feet all game

Brayshaw is back to the wing

Sparrow all game on the ball

Smith to tag Schutlz (always gets away from us)

Petracca stay perm HF.

Get a defensive first-minded player starting in the middle. Have to do with the form of Darcy and Jackson.

Coaching panel to try something different ONCE!

Not a huge David King fan but I do like his saying "... don't get beaten by what you know..."   as we did to the shame of Yze and coaches by Powres Butters and Rozee last week.

Touch of arrogance - our mids up against your mids.  very unsophisticated IMO.

Hoping for better this week from Goody and crew.

3 hours ago, Demon17 said:

Hoping for better this week from Goody and crew.

The players themselves bear no responsibility?

2 minutes ago, bing181 said:

The players themselves bear no responsibility?

Bear....or take ? 

Outs. Hunter. Oliver. 
In. Sparrow Harmes 

Harmes must tag Brayshaw or Serong. 
 

ps. Angus Brayshaw to play more midfield minutes and CBA. 

I think it's Taj time. Genuine winger out, so let's bring one in. 


5 hours ago, Die Hard Demon said:

If we lose to Freo, i’m calling it season over.

I bet there's a Cat fan over on their forum that said the same thing last week. Which would be crazy. They're 2 wins and percentage behind us, and they're still equal with us in flag betting markets and interestingly on the same points as Freo. 

So I don't see how an upset victory by a Fremantle gaining form, completely rules us out for the year - We want the club to rarely drop games, but the reality is we will. If we bounce back and beat the Blues, and one of the Pies or Geelong, we'd still be in the top 4 and we'll still be right in the mix. 4 points Is 4 points, wherever you get it. Guarantee we will get a few 'upset' wins in the next few months too.

Its a moot point because we'll beat them this week anyway.

Edited by John Demonic

3 hours ago, John Demonic said:

If we bounce back and beat the Blues, and one of the Pies or Geelong, we'd still be in the top 4 and we'll still be right in the mix. 4 points Is 4 points, wherever you get it. Guarantee we will get a few 'upset' wins in the next few months too.

Just saw the updated fixture and we get to play Richmond, North, the Hawks and Sydney just before finals too and even on current form you’d imagine none of those should trouble us too much.

Edited by slimecat

We just need to win this week.

Then concentrate on next week when it comes.

I don't think we will see Harmes back in this week, Sparrow will certainly be in and Jordon might be the wing option if we don't appeal the Hunter decision. Take your pick for sub.


41 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

I don't think we will see Harmes back in this week, Sparrow will certainly be in and Jordon might be the wing option if we don't appeal the Hunter decision. Take your pick for sub.

Give it to Harmsey I say. 

Would love to see someone come in for Oliver and make the club think twice about a straight swap back in a few weeks. Don't get me wrong Oliver is straight back in but it's time someone did a Bowey "2021". Nice to see Kade Chandler has started talks on a new contract with the dees. And if we don't appeal Hunter's ban would love to see Langdon back on the other wing for a week. 

17 hours ago, Demon17 said:

Not a huge David King fan but I do like his saying "... don't get beaten by what you know..."   as we did to the shame of Yze and coaches by Powres Butters and Rozee last week.

Touch of arrogance - our mids up against your mids.  very unsophisticated IMO.

Hoping for better this week from Goody and crew.

That's not really what David King means though. We backed our players to get the job done. 

As I've said elsewhere, Butters had 8 possessions in the last quarter, 4 of them were ineffective. We led at the 3/4 time break by effectively 2 goals, after playing 1 quarter. 

It's this sort of over simplistic analysis that is the very reason many find King to be a nuff nuff.

Edited by A F

 
1 hour ago, Dee Zephyr said:

I don't think we will see Harmes back in this week, Sparrow will certainly be in and Jordon might be the wing option if we don't appeal the Hunter decision. Take your pick for sub.

Agree his performance at Casey did not rise above the ruck and say 'pick me'. Mitch White was much more influential around the packs. Perhaps there is a debut in the wings, Taj Woewodin or Blake Howes spring to mind. Bailey Lawrie hasn't gone backwards either, gets amongst it and has some very neat skills.

Obviously not an exhaustive list but Goody named Woewodin, Laurie and Harmes as potential options to come in this week. 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies