Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, dees189227 said:

If this was a bigger name player would the result be the same?

Wow I thought maybe 1 week but 2 come on.

He didn't even concuss him

AFL 360 are going nuts about it. Gerard and even Robbo cannot believe it

Not watching but can hear Robbo struggling to string together a coherent sentence and for once fully understanding what's going on in his head.


Posted
Just now, gs77 said:

Wait a minute- was this was just the regular tribunal hearing because we didn't accept the 2 week offer? So is there still scope for an appeal of this decision? Get Cripps's QC on the case.

Yeah, we can appeal again 

  • Like 5
  • Clap 1

Posted
Just now, Roost it far said:

Can you appeal this ?

Think there is an Appeals Board.

  • Like 2
  • Love 1

Posted

Do NOT roll ovef Melbourne. 

This is the moment to grow up.

Stop being a doormat

Filth wouldn't accept this.... theyd be pushing their media barrows out already.

 

  • Like 7
  • Love 3
  • Clap 1


Posted

Wow that’s [censored]….

ANY attempt to spoil where you collect someone high must be deemed two weeks from now on by the AFL logic

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

He'll win on appeal.  To uphold this verdict means that any "reasonable" player defending by punching the ball from behind and hitting Max Gawn or any player playing in front in the head, ear, jaw etc will be suspended.  There will be nobody left playing.  Gleeson's premise is absurd.

  • Like 3
  • Love 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Anyone got the AFL Law book handy? What are our options? Injunction at law? Serious.

 

Que Mr Leg


Posted

As bad as it is for us as a team if we don't appeal again, and hopefully get JvR off then the AFL has just set a ridiculous new precedent that will alter the way the game is played, scary stuff.

  • Like 1
Posted

I hope we go to the appeals board. What [censored] clowns sit on that board? More lawyers who have never played football in their life?

  • Like 2
Posted

I cannot understand why MFC had Adrian Anderson appear.

While i believe he is a lawyer and was big in the AFL, surely a bigwig barrister might have been worth it

  • Like 1

Posted

Honestly thought this would be a formality because the AFL could not possibly soften the brand in this manner.

I’m stunned

  • Like 6
  • Shocked 1

Posted

Imagine how many players that hit Gawny every week will get rubbed out!

My guess is none

Must appeal

 

  • Like 5
  • Love 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Do NOT roll ovef Melbourne. 

This is the moment to grow up.

Stop being a doormat

Filth wouldn't accept this.... theyd be pushing their media barrows out already.

 

100% this ☝🏼

  • Like 1
Posted

A terrible decision at so many levels.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...