Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

I love the look of JVR. But I want him bought in in the right way also. I guess the question has to be,  is giving JVR 2nd ruck duties just too much on debut? I watched him rucking for casey and can’t see that’s anywhere near his 1 wood. Id love to see him debut as a forward and perhaps take the throw ins in the fwd line.. but if he’s in the centre square that feels like a recipe for a mauling. you have no doubt seen more of him and know a bit about his character …what’s your opinion WCW? 

I’m totally with you on the timing of his debut. Ideally he’d be debuting when we’re closer to full strength and therefore the pressure on his performance wouldn’t have the potential for overwhelming him.

Personally, I think he is ready. He’s a confident boy but still seems very grounded and not inclined to get carried away. At that age kids seem to be fearless and this can be a good thing going into next week’s match. I know he’s had the best possible psychological preparation, not only from his senior teammates but also from our staff who (I’ve been told by a little birdie) are amazing when it comes to the mental well-being of our boys… above and beyond type things.

Physically? Also ready, imho. 

 
On 3/24/2023 at 11:36 PM, dazzledavey36 said:

Harmes played majority in the midfield and only gathered 10 disposals. No he didn't tag anyone before some jump down my throat again. Enough is enough, his efforts tonight were simply deplorable. 

McDonald is cooked. No simple way to look at it. We all know his foot nearly done so while we have a fit Schache and JVF then may as well see what they got to offer.

I'm a broken record with Melksham so I'm not adding anymore to this.

If Petty is sore then just give him 2 weeks. He was woeful tonight and Tomlinson was the better defender. Reward good form at least when May comes back next week.

Agree with you on Harmes, Tmac and Melk time to make changes...

3 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

What we’re seeing at present is the advent of the elite young player coming in and playing well from the get go - Nick Daicos, Harry Sheezel, Will Ashcroft, Cam McKenzie and Mattaes Phillipou. They’re all medium sized midfield types (although not necessarily playing there yet at this level). 

Jacob van Rooyen is a key position player with a season of VFL behind him and before that, a few WAFL games. He has to be rewarded with an AFL debut very soon and if it’s true that Schache is out with concussion, next week against Sydney is the time to make it happen.

And you know what they have, pace unlike Harmes, Tmac, and Melk who are slower than the milk horses and I would even throw in Hibberd, agree with you on JVR just get him and give him a decent chance.

 

Collingwood had 16 players hit the scoreboard yesterday, 14 of them kicking goals. Last week it was 13 players with 10 of them kicking goals. I understand some people on here have greater knowledge of the tactical side of the game than me, but I’m sick of reading that i / we / someone doesn’t understand someone’s roll within the team. We supposedly have the no.1 ranked midfield and defence and no.6 for our fwd line. We have numerous fwds that on a regular basis don’t kick goals, but I’m led to believe they’re in the team because of their defensive efforts and or their role within the team. It’s seems to me it’s everyone’s job in Collingwood’s fwd line to kick goals. We’ve gone from slow predictable down the line into the fwd pocket, to slightly quicker ball movement to the top of the square where we have more than one fwd competing for the ball. We need to get some separation from our fwds, an extension of that is the separation of the oppositions defence. Cloning Kosi would help enormously as he gives us variation in the middle but his creativity around goals is unrivalled. We need quick entries inside fwd 50 and some more youth to go with it. I’d love to see JVR given a chance, Chandler is starting to show a bit, along side Fritsch and Brown we would have a diverse fwd line. If not this week, then the 6 following games are a lot easier and gives us a chance to try something different. 

5 hours ago, BDA said:

Melks is great to bring on in the second half when he's fresh and the opposition are starting to tire. He doesn't have the legs for a full game anymore as we saw on Friday night.

He very classy though. Took his goal against the doggies from outside the 50 brilliantly. I don't think we have anyone else on our list that would have nailed that kick.

 

Sparrow? Kozzy?


2 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

He has to come in. 

36 touches in the VFL.

They were often as an unopposed sweeper in the backline. His disposal was good but rarely was he pressured.

Good game but I'm not sure what it means for AFL selection

May, JVR, Jordan and Hibberd must all be a chance this weekend. This is a roll up your sleeves and get dirty weekend more so than most. The 4 above will all give you that level of effort, it's just how they roll. The outs for mine are Gawn, Melksham, McVee and Harmes. Can't see Goodwin making 4 changes though.

 

Bris played terribly against port, we played terribly against Bris, Sydney will play terribly against us. Ezpz.

36 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Can’t believe we’re currently favourites to win this one.

Sydney has had the softest start to the year of any side. GC and Hawks. A complete joke. 
Can’t judge their form yet. 


45 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Can’t believe we’re currently favourites to win this one.

This. Scratching my head that we’re 1.60 favourites. That will come in no doubt, but gosh we’d want to start a hell of a lot better than we did this week.

Hard to judge Dogs game (Saints rolled them by 50 as well) and the Lions game (Max goes down inside 5, we play half a quarter of footy and nearly roll them). This will indicate where we are more realistically at. If we can’t beat the Swans (something we have struggled with recently) then we ain’t doing much this year.

Longmire also comprehensively has the wood over Goody, so let’s see if it’s the same old ‘back in the system’ or something a little different. A lot of this is up to the players’ mindset……….do they want to work hard for it?

2 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Sydney has had the softest start to the year of any side. GC and Hawks. A complete joke. 
Can’t judge their form yet. 

Fair point.
But you can judge losing 8 of our last 9 MCG games to Sydney. Most of them when we’ve become a half competent football side.

16 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

My weekly teams selection

Seniors

B: Lever, May, Bowey

HB: Hibberd, Petty, Rivers

C: Hunter, Oliver, Langdon

HF: Petracca, McDonald, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, Brown, Spargo

FOLL: Grundy, Brayshaw, Viney

IC: McVee, Sparrow, Chandler, van Rooyen

SUB: Laurie

 

Reserves

B: Adams, D.Turner, D.Smith

HB: K.Turner, Tomlinson, Buntine

C: Howes, Dunstan, Sheppard

HF: Moniz-Wakefield, J.Smith, Gray

F: Melksham, Jefferson, Sestan

FOLL: Bell, Jordon, Harmes

IC: Verrall, Farris-White, Munro, Gregory,  Cross

 

Not sure why Disco, Verrall and Farris-White were out. Does anyone know?

 

I fiited in Harmes and Melksham.

2 hours ago, Demon Disciple said:

This. Scratching my head that we’re 1.60 favourites. That will come in no doubt, but gosh we’d want to start a hell of a lot better than we did this week.

Hard to judge Dogs game (Saints rolled them by 50 as well) and the Lions game (Max goes down inside 5, we play half a quarter of footy and nearly roll them). This will indicate where we are more realistically at. If we can’t beat the Swans (something we have struggled with recently) then we ain’t doing much this year.

Longmire also comprehensively has the wood over Goody, so let’s see if it’s the same old ‘back in the system’ or something a little different. A lot of this is up to the players’ mindset……….do they want to work hard for it?

So if Spargo is having a shot from 40m out after the siren down by 3, to win the game. Whether he kicks the goal or not, will decide whether we are doing much this year?

Strange logic, I would've thought its more about 'how' the game is played next week, rather than the result.

It's a round 3 match against a red hot team coming off a grand final, without our captain the most influential player on any football field. Take a breather!

Edited by John Demonic

On 3/24/2023 at 11:59 PM, dee-tox said:

I have had enough of Harmes already. Not convinced he is AFL level despite playing well as a tagger before signing a ridiculous five year deal.

Bizzare comment. 143 games, key premiership player, gets a game at at least 15 other clubs.

Edited by Queanbeyan Demon


We could put in a good performance and still lose so I'm not as concerned about the W next week.

I just want to see a proper performance. And from our mids in particular. 

Its pretty simple

This is the real test for whether Goodwin and Co have learned anything from last year.

The Swans are a good side and their style of play is difficult for us. We have tried to play the same way and come unstuck repeatedly.

We have to stop their overlap run and ensure their mids do not get control. Last time Buddy took May out of the contest and their other talls killed us as well as their medium fwds like Hayward. 

If we have learned anything it will be on show here. If not the same fate most likely awaits us.

16 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Its pretty simple

This is the real test for whether Goodwin and Co have learned anything from last year.

The Swans are a good side and their style of play is difficult for us. We have tried to play the same way and come unstuck repeatedly.

We have to stop their overlap run and ensure their mids do not get control. Last time Buddy took May out of the contest and their other talls killed us as well as their medium fwds like Hayward. 

If we have learned anything it will be on show here. If not the same fate most likely awaits us.

Agree, our form this year is somewhat unknown, best the Bulldogs who are not too 8 and lost to the Lions, who got smashed round 1. Need a win this week 

45 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Its pretty simple

This is the real test for whether Goodwin and Co have learned anything from last year.

The Swans are a good side and their style of play is difficult for us. We have tried to play the same way and come unstuck repeatedly.

We have to stop their overlap run and ensure their mids do not get control. Last time Buddy took May out of the contest and their other talls killed us as well as their medium fwds like Hayward. 

If we have learned anything it will be on show here. If not the same fate most likely awaits us.

Yep... this week & the Pies / Geelong will be decent indicators as to how we are fairing vs 2022 & 21

Goodwin essentially said we were staid and boring. Hi Clayton and Jack and Ed, do you not what to play like this?

This week will tell us whether our best players agree with the move to replicate Collingwood in transition. We’re lost if they don’t. God help JVR and anyone else we blood.


4 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

They were often as an unopposed sweeper in the backline. His disposal was good but rarely was he pressured.

Good game but I'm not sure what it means for AFL selection

We need a mongrel to play on Papley and he fits the bill perfectly.

We beat Sydney twice last year if it wasn’t for injuries / fitness. 
 

I expect the midfield to come out and make a huge statement next week. They have too much pride to accept the dismal performance.

3 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Sydney has had the softest start to the year of any side. GC and Hawks. A complete joke. 
Can’t judge their form yet. 

How has this been allowed to happen?

An AFL Grand Finalist, top 4 team to be given a simple introduction/transition into the 2023 season.

You can just picture all the AFL cronies gathered around a table together discussing the AFL fixtures for the next year.

They have their list of teams who in their eyes must get off to a good start so the big markets around Australia (NSW) stay interested in the game and the Swans would be right on the top of their list.

Edited by YesitwasaWin4theAges

 
14 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

We beat Sydney twice last year if it wasn’t for injuries / fitness. 
 

I expect the midfield to come out and make a huge statement next week. They have too much pride to accept the dismal performance.

So we lost twice?

Also, how is the crowd going to be this Sunday? I was there last year and it felt like an away game. 

Over/Under on excuses at 5.5 @ $2.

Thats money for jam.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 109 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Sad
      • Love
      • Like
    • 376 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies