Jump to content

Featured Replies

22 hours ago, Sydee said:

It's hard to be creative when the go to option is consistently bomb the ball to the left-hand pocket - ok maybe a slight over exaggeration but our system of efficiently moving the ball to our forwards certainly needs some work - we get far too many inside 50's that result in zero score conversion  

Makes me wonder....Are they all directed to bomb into that pocket?

Imo that "should" be the last option when nothing else is on.

Is gameplan a reason we are not showing much creativity?

Are we told just to execute basic skills and not really take the game on?

Are we just lazy and all head for that pocket and repeat?

Do we not have a good forwards coach that is teaching them any forward craft?

Our crumbers are rarely front and square.

Our talls are rarely leadiing.

Imo there is so much that needs to come together in the forward half of ground, we just look amateur in this area.

Still not sold on ANB or Spargo as forwards, they work hard defensively but not doing enough in the forward half.   Maybe a few personnel changes would help us too?

Interested to hear what other posters think in regards to our forward issues and how we go about getting better in this area.

 
1 hour ago, NeveroddoreveN said:

Makes me wonder....Are they all directed to bomb into that pocket?

Imo that "should" be the last option when nothing else is on.

Is gameplan a reason we are not showing much creativity?

Are we told just to execute basic skills and not really take the game on?

Are we just lazy and all head for that pocket and repeat?

Do we not have a good forwards coach that is teaching them any forward craft?

Our crumbers are rarely front and square.

Our talls are rarely leadiing.

Imo there is so much that needs to come together in the forward half of ground, we just look amateur in this area.

Still not sold on ANB or Spargo as forwards, they work hard defensively but not doing enough in the forward half.   Maybe a few personnel changes would help us too?

Interested to hear what other posters think in regards to our forward issues and how we go about getting better in this area.

All interesting points - not sure this thread is the best placed to discuss though 🙂

Agree there is a lot that can and should be improved - not sure there is any single reason why our I50 efficiency is NQR

This year I believe we were ranked 3rd for average I50 count (last year 2nd) - however our average goals per game rank dropped from 4th to 6th - not that bad but obviously worse

One of the biggest shifts in team stats was average tackles per game where we led the comp last year and this year dropped to 13th - fitness / mindset? who knows but it looked like that watching from the sidelines some games

I'm not a fan of the predictable kick-in to the left hand wing every time either - I'd love to see a bit more variation in that as well - maybe a Bowey or Salem taking the kick ins as I think their kicking is vastly superior to May's 

On 10/15/2022 at 9:14 AM, Lucifers Hero said:

'Footywire' which is usually fairly accurate is showing a one year contract for Schache.

It surprises me as when a player changes club it is usually for a minimum of 2 years.

If it is one year it really gives Schache a strong message to decide how much he wants a football career.

I'll update the Contracts Thread for Schache.  If anyone sees any other info on his contract please let me know.

from my experience FW usually moves the layer to their new club and leaves the existing contract length tacked on which would be reflected in what you're seeing for hunter and in schaches case he was ooc so they have to at least say '23 when they moved him. i would imagine it is +1 on both those deals making it LH 3yrs and JS 2yrs just as a wild guess but could be wrong

 
5 hours ago, NeveroddoreveN said:

Makes me wonder....Are they all directed to bomb into that pocket?

Imo that "should" be the last option when nothing else is on.

Is gameplan a reason we are not showing much creativity?

Are we told just to execute basic skills and not really take the game on?

Are we just lazy and all head for that pocket and repeat?

Do we not have a good forwards coach that is teaching them any forward craft?

Our crumbers are rarely front and square.

Our talls are rarely leadiing.

Imo there is so much that needs to come together in the forward half of ground, we just look amateur in this area.

Still not sold on ANB or Spargo as forwards, they work hard defensively but not doing enough in the forward half.   Maybe a few personnel changes would help us too?

Interested to hear what other posters think in regards to our forward issues and how we go about getting better in this area.

Cannot disagree with any of these statements, NeverN..

57 minutes ago, Turner said:

from my experience FW usually moves the layer to their new club and leaves the existing contract length tacked on which would be reflected in what you're seeing for hunter and in schaches case he was ooc so they have to at least say '23 when they moved him. i would imagine it is +1 on both those deals making it LH 3yrs and JS 2yrs just as a wild guess but could be wrong

Yeah, they updated Jackson but I didn't check other players that have move clubs.

Contract length may sift through in the coming weeks.  Its a bit annoying that it isn't in press releases or discussed in trade articles.


I'm quite optimistic about this one, i've always rated his talent, a bit like Weid he's not quite been able to really lock down a spot, but i think he can really take a step at the Dees and be a best 22 player. 

 

27 minutes ago, Dwight Schrute said:

I'm quite optimistic about this one, i've always rated his talent, a bit like Weid he's not quite been able to really lock down a spot, but i think he can really take a step at the Dees and be a best 22 player. 

 

I'm more hopeful than optimistic ...

 

The environment at the MFC with Mark Williams has been exceptional so he may become the player that the recruiters touted when he was drafted.

He will replace BB and has more strings to his bow

Edited by durango


Josh Schache is a depth acquisition that arose purely because the Weid wanted to leave. Tim Lamb said as much. He also mentioned that his versatility was attractive.

He will play a few cameos for us if needed but spend most time with Casey. He won’t become a best 22 player and won’t miraculously solve our forward problems. Would be very pleasantly surprised if he did though but I’m not holding out much hope. 


4 hours ago, BDA said:

Josh Schache is a depth acquisition that arose purely because the Weid wanted to leave. Tim Lamb said as much. He also mentioned that his versatility was attractive.

He will play a few cameos for us if needed but spend most time with Casey. He won’t become a best 22 player and won’t miraculously solve our forward problems. Would be very pleasantly surprised if he did though but I’m not holding out much hope. 

Can’t be any worse than the Weed (saying with respect for a man who did his best)  The Shack was competing against  much better forwards at the Dogs, therefore I’m hopeful but not expecting the Shack to be our main power house forward. 

Guys still young. I'm hoping he can prove all the He Won't and He Ain't Gonna people wrong. Bit more mobile than BBB, so might take his spot if not soon, in the future. 

5 hours ago, BDA said:

Josh Schache is a depth acquisition that arose purely because the Weid wanted to leave. Tim Lamb said as much. He also mentioned that his versatility was attractive.

He will play a few cameos for us if needed but spend most time with Casey. He won’t become a best 22 player and won’t miraculously solve our forward problems. Would be very pleasantly surprised if he did though but I’m not holding out much hope. 

Maybe the change of scene, and the kick in the butt of being dropped will enable / push him to reach his true potential. 
Don’t know that he needs to be written off completely at this stage. 

6 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Maybe the change of scene, and the kick in the butt of being dropped will enable / push him to reach his true potential. 

Love the sentiment... what's the evidence that that happens though Mono for other players across the AFL/VFL history...?

He sounds lovely in the interview... lovely person, lovely vibe... Casey for him then...(mostly)...but please...prove me wrong.

Edited by Engorged Onion

10 hours ago, 4_Kent_Watts said:

Guys still young. I'm hoping he can prove all the He Won't and He Ain't Gonna people wrong. Bit more mobile than BBB, so might take his spot if not soon, in the future. 

Revising the game plan in the forward line could make a real difference to our scoring rate and accuracy, including all of the entries to the fwd line itself. Hunter and Schache could be entering into a carpet ride, given their attributes and also, most of our existing forwards would benefit as well because they are potent footballers traditionally given a teaspoon of opportunity instead of a tablespoon of common sense. I'm thinking what good forward feeds could be possible, adding the talent-base with Hunter and Schache, fed by Langdon, Clarrie, Tracca, Gus, Rivers, Sparrow et al, and observant, agile JVR, Fritta, BBB, Petty, Kozzie, Spargs, ANB, et al. It's also about suitable pathways being available, eyes up, without the gaps in the chain of events that formerly had to dictate that in the majority of cases, we bombed long - over the heads of the gaps that existed - to get the ball into that disastrous left forward pocket. 


On 10/18/2022 at 11:53 AM, NeveroddoreveN said:

Makes me wonder....Are they all directed to bomb into that pocket?

Imo that "should" be the last option when nothing else is on.

Is gameplan a reason we are not showing much creativity?

Are we told just to execute basic skills and not really take the game on?

Are we just lazy and all head for that pocket and repeat?

Do we not have a good forwards coach that is teaching them any forward craft?

Our crumbers are rarely front and s

Still not sold on ANB or Spargo as forwards, they work hard defensively but not doing enough in the forward half.   Maybe a few personnel changes would help us too?

ANB was one of our leading goal assist player two years in a row.

Edited by Ugottobekidding

On 10/23/2022 at 3:47 PM, BDA said:

Josh Schache is a depth acquisition that arose purely because the Weid wanted to leave. Tim Lamb said as much. He also mentioned that his versatility was attractive.

 

As Tim Lamb says, it's his versatility that is attractive. Is taller than Weid, can play forward or back and has proven that he is a goal kicker in the VFL. Could also be cover for the injury depleted BBB.

Sadly, Weid never did. With some intense coaching and training, could do well and surprise.

 
15 hours ago, Ugottobekidding said:

ANB was one of our leading goal assist player two years in a row.

Played a few good games this year.

Was a much better year the one prior.

For a Senior player he lacks consistency for me.

Could never doubt his effort, just his output/skills.

Each to their own though!

  • 2 weeks later...

I watched the first half of the July 20/21 Dees v Doggies game yesterday and the Doggies had Schache playing in the backline and back up ruck, he spent a lot of the time matching up with Dogga.

I'd have to say he eclipsed Dogga in the ruck and played a pretty useful game. 

He's got a good pair of hands, can take a grab and kick straight, which is a bonus. He may be a little light at 94K's but is a good height and looks more comfortable playing in a defensive role. As has been mentioned if he can free up Petty to go forward, that could solve a couple of problems.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 145 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 111 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 32 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Haha
      • Thanks
    • 252 replies