Jump to content

Featured Replies

36 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Faaaaaarrr out! 
A RESULT HAS GONE OUR WAY!!!!

I havent been this excited since my first random kiss as a 14 yr old

 
Just now, picket fence said:

I havent been this excited since my first random kiss as a 14 yr old

Kissing the mirror doesn’t count. 

1 minute ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Kissing the mirror doesn’t count. 

Beat me to it WCW😂

 

Mixed feelings about this tigers win. They would be a very dangerous side if they get in the 8. I prefer them out than in and don’t fear Brisbane as much no matter where they finish. They could be energised with this win and cruise past their next 3 opponents. Hope I’m way off with my worry.

Edited by John Crow Batty


34 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

From the AFL game day thread

"Searching for their first win since Round 21, 2014 at the MCG, Brisbane gave up a 42-point lead and were overrun by the Tigers. This came about as Brisbane's ball movement was stifled by Richmond. In the first half, Brisbane turned 34 defensive chains into 16 forward 50 entries and 6.3 (39); in the second half, 30 chains only yielded seven entries and three behinds."

Q) What does a Brisvegas supporter do after watching the Bears win the Premiership?

A) Turn off the PlayStation.

15 minutes ago, Redleg said:

For now.

Keep winning and it could be us against the Swans at the G.

Lose one and it could be Swans at the SCG.

If that was the case, I think I would prefer to finish 4th and play the Cats at the G.

Haven't worked out all the scenarios needed for various results yet, I am sure others on DL will. 

If we win all 3 it looks like our opponent will come down to who wins the Sydney v Pies game at the SCG.

But a lot still to play out.

 

 

Edited by Jibroni

8 minutes ago, picket fence said:

I havent been this excited since my first random kiss as a 14 yr old

I don't aim to get too prying here picket ...... but your statement begs the question about the meaning of "random".

Were you referring to the random nature of who you kissed or where you kissed? 

 
13 minutes ago, picket fence said:

I havent been this excited since my first random kiss as a 14 yr old

Not sure what that says about your sex life pf!

16 minutes ago, picket fence said:

I havent been this excited since my first random kiss as a 14 yr old

I wouldn’t call your cousin ‘random’.


The game is so much better without countless players staging for frees

Result - open footy, more attacking footy and more scoring opportunities

Less congestion as the players need to keep moving the ball on instead of looking to get a soft free kick ... less stoppages as well

The game at the MCG produced 29 goals ... what's not to like? 

High contact, soft, frivolous free kicks are no more (in a general sense) and the players have been well and truly sent a message

Players being fined retrospectively for staging is a great move too

 

Edited by Macca

8 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

What a Magnificent choke by Brisvegas

7 goals up….

Superb result

They certainly don't like playing at the G

 

Is that 15 in a row the've lost?


41 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I don't aim to get too prying here picket ...... but your statement begs the question about the meaning of "random".

Were you referring to the random nature of who you kissed or where you kissed? 

Look ..it was several random young ladies at a party u know chocolate cake, Fanta, chips and the odd pash. No more or less than that! SHAME on Demonlanders bringing my good name, into disrepute! Anyway back to reality..

CRACKIN WIN TO THE TOIGS

43 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

I wouldn’t call your cousin ‘random’.

once it's 2nd cousin or higher - play on

3 hours ago, Demonstone said:

That doesn't help!  :wacko:   When you say "queue", do you mean "cue"?

Sorry, yes

20 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Look ..it was several random young ladies at a party u know chocolate cake, Fanta, chips and the odd pash. No more or less than that! SHAME on Demonlanders bringing my good name, into disrepute! Anyway back to reality..

So it was all a dream. Is that what you’re saying?

48 minutes ago, Macca said:

The game is so much better without countless players staging for frees

Result - open footy, more attacking footy and more scoring opportunities

Less congestion as the players need to keep moving the ball on instead of looking to get a soft free kick ... less stoppages as well

The game at the MCG produced 29 goals ... what's not to like? 

High contact, soft, frivolous free kicks are no more (in a general sense) and the players have been well and truly sent a message

Players being fined retrospectively for staging is a great move too

 

Agree on shelving the soft frees although I thought Cumberland’s first or second where he walked about 10m toward goal with a Lions player desperately hanging on around his waist then grounded the ball but got back up to kick the goal in full view of the umpire was pushing the boundary! Holding the ball or dropping the ball surely. But yes great spectacle. 


2 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

Agree on shelving the soft frees although I thought Cumberland’s first or second where he walked about 10m toward goal with a Lions player desperately hanging on around his waist then grounded the ball but got back up to kick the goal in full view of the umpire was pushing the boundary! Holding the ball or dropping the ball surely. But yes great spectacle. 

That was a shocking “non” decision 

 

In light of that Tigers win this week, the Pies game next week is absolutely massive. If we win, and barring some extraordinary thumping by one of the sides below us our percentage should lock us in to second with a win over either the blues or lions. We got this Dees.

1 hour ago, picket fence said:

Look ..it was several random young ladies at a party u know chocolate cake, Fanta, chips and the odd pash. No more or less than that! SHAME on Demonlanders bringing my good name, into disrepute! Anyway back to reality..

CRACKIN WIN TO THE TOIGS

He ... "doth protest too much, methinks" !!!  A sure sign of a guilty conscience picket !!

I think some bad [censored] [censored] went down - I'm tipping sex drugs and rock and roll !!!!

 
2 hours ago, Demonland said:

Lions were 7 goals up weren’t they?

Is that a veiled reference to the Sullivan line? 😁

40 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

That was a shocking “non” decision 

 

Would that be the non call of rebouncing the ball that went about 5 meters out of the centre circle. #23 is a shockingly bad umpire.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    It was bad enough that the Melbourne Football Club created yet another humiliating scenario inside its wretched season at Marvel Stadium last Sunday, but the final insult is that it has been commanded to return to the scene of the crime to inflict further punishment on its fans this week. Incidentally, if this match preview, of a game that promises to be one of the most unattractive fixtures in the history of the game, happens to cut out of your computer screen three quarters of the way through, it’s no coincidence. I’ll be mirroring the Demons’ lacklustre effort against St Kilda from last Sunday when they conceded the largest last quarter turnaround for victory in the history of the game.

    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

    • 9 replies
  • CASEY: Sandringham

    The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
    Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

      • Like
    • 484 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 27 replies