Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just curious if CH7 are dissecting the dodgy free kicks? Fox have mentioned it but haven’t shown them it’s bloody frustrating. 

 

What a great game!!

dogs went in harder for longer. Won the contested numbers and deserved the win. 

lions needed another fwd to mark a few

Great game of footy, some tough desperate football in the last 5 minutes. But I can't see either of them beating Port. 

As for the Lions, they seem to lose games in the same way. Cameron gets off the leash in the first quarter, the other team changes their defensive mindset in the midfield denying Cameron time and space to roam freely, and he shows the limits of his game. Other team comes over the top.

Dogs very good in a tight game. 

The umpires seemed to be rewarding incidental contact, but I have to admit, on most of those occasions, the Dogs were first to the ball. 

 
8 minutes ago, wheaters31 said:

No surprise to see the Bulldogs and Cats on top of the freekick differential ladder for the year

 182903049_ScreenShot2021-09-04at10_23_33pm.thumb.png.d011c8a519230b3f72e7278531570c36.png

That's disgusting.

Just now, layzie said:

You just have to love Aussie Rules Footy folks. Yeah some poor umpiring but the real stars are those guys on the field and they played their hearts out. 

It’s true layzie, but the game needs to be protected, dare I say saved from its single most obvious blight. When the game’s  adjudication is so often horrendously flawed, it becomes very hard to watch, because it destroys the idea that two teams are playing each other on equal terms. It’s frankly amateurish, and simply has to be better.


It was 19-28 btw, Daz, but close enough.

5 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

That's disgusting.

Worse than that Dazzle it a bloody conspiracy!!

 

...And...then there were 4

Bulldogs went +31 in the 2016 finals.

So far in the 2021 finals they are +17 in just 2 games.

It stinks, and unbiased supporters are going ballistic on Twitter. 


Wow I wish that clock ran for an extra 10 seconds because the lions were about to go back into there 50. I did want to see overtime. Feel for Fagan, I think I'd rather lose by 4 goals than by 1 point. 

Daniher only the 1 goal. Would have liked to see im kick a few more. 

What 2 great prelims next week. 

Just now, The heart beats true said:

Bulldogs went +31 in the 2016 finals.

So far in the 2021 finals they are +17 in just 2 games.

It stinks, and unbiased supporters are going ballistic on Twitter. 

It's so transparent, yet nothing ever changes. Season after season, the same armchair ride to the same teams.

Two years in a row the Lions have had an advantage that other teams would cry out for in finals (home ground/crowd) and it’s amounted to nothing. The dogs are getting their pressure game going again but really I think port will account for them purely because Port will have the week off and the Dogs just had a fierce encounter. 

Edited by Pates

Absolutely brain melting, the inconsistency between what the umps see as a free kick to the Dogs versus play on for the Lions.

God the Lions missed Hipwood. Playing a man short with big Joe on the ground.

I thought Brisbane was the better team, so really don't mind them going out.

Umpires! was Brisbane ahead on the count with frees for, at the end of the first quarter. They stormed home for the dogs in the end, brutal.

When I heard an umpire heckle Johannisen after the siren in the third, i thought they would even up the count in the last. As he was getting into his routine, came the call, kick it over the man on mark. 

Plenty of Brisbane players went missing at times in that game. The Dogs got belted up, they will be sore and it appears they have some injuries, a few may not get up for next week.

Edited by kev martin


13 minutes ago, Webber said:

It’s true layzie, but the game needs to be protected, dare I say saved from its single most obvious blight. When the game’s  adjudication is so often horrendously flawed, it becomes very hard to watch, because it destroys the idea that two teams are playing each other on equal terms. It’s frankly amateurish, and simply has to be better.

Spot on Webber. It definitely makes it hard to watch, I just wonder if it will ever change.

7 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

Wow I wish that clock ran for an extra 10 seconds because the lions were about to go back into there 50. I did want to see overtime. Feel for Fagan, I think I'd rather lose by 4 goals than by 1 point. 

Daniher only the 1 goal. Would have liked to see im kick a few more. 

What 2 great prelims next week. 

Daniher is an absolute DUD

10 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

Wow I wish that clock ran for an extra 10 seconds because the lions were about to go back into there 50. I did want to see overtime. Feel for Fagan, I think I'd rather lose by 4 goals than by 1 point. 

Daniher only the 1 goal. Would have liked to see im kick a few more. 

What 2 great prelims next week. 

Lions got your extra 24 seconds to make top 4 due to a timekeeping error in R23

Oh the conspiracy!

the umpires get together and decide they want the dogs to win! It’s been happening for years. You can tell as the dogs haven’t won a final in 5 years. 

they were harder at it and won contested ball. Admittedly a few dodgy calls but it happens 

you honestly think the umps get together and decide to pay more frees to the one team?? 😂


So in the prelims it is rd23 all over again. This is spooking my MFCSS.

3 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

bears have finished top 4 for the last three years for a solitary win

Dogs are not finished top 4 in the last 10 years and have a flag

2 minutes ago, DubDee said:

you honestly think the umps get together and decide to pay more frees to the one team?? 😂

Plenty on here seem to think so.  Some even convince themselves that the AFL tells them which team to favour.

 
2 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Plenty on here seem to think so.  Some even convince themselves that the AFL tells them which team to favour.

Lol. Crazy isn’t it

3 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Plenty on here seem to think so.  Some even convince themselves that the AFL tells them which team to favour.

Reckon AFL would want the flag in “developing market”


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 95 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 31 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Haha
      • Thanks
    • 252 replies
  • VOTES: Port Adelaide

    Max Gawn has an insurmountable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzy Pickett. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 32 replies