Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just curious if CH7 are dissecting the dodgy free kicks? Fox have mentioned it but haven’t shown them it’s bloody frustrating. 

 

What a great game!!

dogs went in harder for longer. Won the contested numbers and deserved the win. 

lions needed another fwd to mark a few

Great game of footy, some tough desperate football in the last 5 minutes. But I can't see either of them beating Port. 

As for the Lions, they seem to lose games in the same way. Cameron gets off the leash in the first quarter, the other team changes their defensive mindset in the midfield denying Cameron time and space to roam freely, and he shows the limits of his game. Other team comes over the top.

Dogs very good in a tight game. 

The umpires seemed to be rewarding incidental contact, but I have to admit, on most of those occasions, the Dogs were first to the ball. 

 
8 minutes ago, wheaters31 said:

No surprise to see the Bulldogs and Cats on top of the freekick differential ladder for the year

 182903049_ScreenShot2021-09-04at10_23_33pm.thumb.png.d011c8a519230b3f72e7278531570c36.png

That's disgusting.

Just now, layzie said:

You just have to love Aussie Rules Footy folks. Yeah some poor umpiring but the real stars are those guys on the field and they played their hearts out. 

It’s true layzie, but the game needs to be protected, dare I say saved from its single most obvious blight. When the game’s  adjudication is so often horrendously flawed, it becomes very hard to watch, because it destroys the idea that two teams are playing each other on equal terms. It’s frankly amateurish, and simply has to be better.


It was 19-28 btw, Daz, but close enough.

5 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

That's disgusting.

Worse than that Dazzle it a bloody conspiracy!!

 

...And...then there were 4

Bulldogs went +31 in the 2016 finals.

So far in the 2021 finals they are +17 in just 2 games.

It stinks, and unbiased supporters are going ballistic on Twitter. 


Wow I wish that clock ran for an extra 10 seconds because the lions were about to go back into there 50. I did want to see overtime. Feel for Fagan, I think I'd rather lose by 4 goals than by 1 point. 

Daniher only the 1 goal. Would have liked to see im kick a few more. 

What 2 great prelims next week. 

Just now, The heart beats true said:

Bulldogs went +31 in the 2016 finals.

So far in the 2021 finals they are +17 in just 2 games.

It stinks, and unbiased supporters are going ballistic on Twitter. 

It's so transparent, yet nothing ever changes. Season after season, the same armchair ride to the same teams.

Two years in a row the Lions have had an advantage that other teams would cry out for in finals (home ground/crowd) and it’s amounted to nothing. The dogs are getting their pressure game going again but really I think port will account for them purely because Port will have the week off and the Dogs just had a fierce encounter. 

Edited by Pates

Absolutely brain melting, the inconsistency between what the umps see as a free kick to the Dogs versus play on for the Lions.

God the Lions missed Hipwood. Playing a man short with big Joe on the ground.

I thought Brisbane was the better team, so really don't mind them going out.

Umpires! was Brisbane ahead on the count with frees for, at the end of the first quarter. They stormed home for the dogs in the end, brutal.

When I heard an umpire heckle Johannisen after the siren in the third, i thought they would even up the count in the last. As he was getting into his routine, came the call, kick it over the man on mark. 

Plenty of Brisbane players went missing at times in that game. The Dogs got belted up, they will be sore and it appears they have some injuries, a few may not get up for next week.

Edited by kev martin


13 minutes ago, Webber said:

It’s true layzie, but the game needs to be protected, dare I say saved from its single most obvious blight. When the game’s  adjudication is so often horrendously flawed, it becomes very hard to watch, because it destroys the idea that two teams are playing each other on equal terms. It’s frankly amateurish, and simply has to be better.

Spot on Webber. It definitely makes it hard to watch, I just wonder if it will ever change.

7 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

Wow I wish that clock ran for an extra 10 seconds because the lions were about to go back into there 50. I did want to see overtime. Feel for Fagan, I think I'd rather lose by 4 goals than by 1 point. 

Daniher only the 1 goal. Would have liked to see im kick a few more. 

What 2 great prelims next week. 

Daniher is an absolute DUD

10 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

Wow I wish that clock ran for an extra 10 seconds because the lions were about to go back into there 50. I did want to see overtime. Feel for Fagan, I think I'd rather lose by 4 goals than by 1 point. 

Daniher only the 1 goal. Would have liked to see im kick a few more. 

What 2 great prelims next week. 

Lions got your extra 24 seconds to make top 4 due to a timekeeping error in R23

Oh the conspiracy!

the umpires get together and decide they want the dogs to win! It’s been happening for years. You can tell as the dogs haven’t won a final in 5 years. 

they were harder at it and won contested ball. Admittedly a few dodgy calls but it happens 

you honestly think the umps get together and decide to pay more frees to the one team?? 😂


So in the prelims it is rd23 all over again. This is spooking my MFCSS.

3 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

bears have finished top 4 for the last three years for a solitary win

Dogs are not finished top 4 in the last 10 years and have a flag

2 minutes ago, DubDee said:

you honestly think the umps get together and decide to pay more frees to the one team?? 😂

Plenty on here seem to think so.  Some even convince themselves that the AFL tells them which team to favour.

 
2 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Plenty on here seem to think so.  Some even convince themselves that the AFL tells them which team to favour.

Lol. Crazy isn’t it

3 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Plenty on here seem to think so.  Some even convince themselves that the AFL tells them which team to favour.

Reckon AFL would want the flag in “developing market”


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 123 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 41 replies