Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted

Gawn - dominated centre again

Pickett - needed more involvement 

Brown - showed some signs

Fritsch - had little influence 

Viney - game has passed

Petracca - prolific but uninspiring

McDonald - was rarely sighted

Oliver - incredible first half

Hunt - just a game

Neal-Bullen - prolific but ineffective 

May - playing under duress

Salem - couldn’t get involved 

Harmes - not a tagger

Jackson - hardly noticed again

Lever - solid 4 quarters

Spargo - went missing again

Brayshaw - loose and limited

Hibberd - little to commend

Langdon - energy was missing

Jordon - was he playing?

Rivers - hit the wall

Petty - was rarely noticed

 

 

  • Like 3

Posted

Umps. free kicks count 11-23 to favour the Dogs 
 In 3 words 

Were the difference  

Totally fuc&&)$&(n inconsistent 

Favoured The Dogs

Throwing is illegal 

Absolutely killed us 

Crucified the Dees 

finally … 

Speak up Goodwin  (just say “thought we were a bit stiff on the night and have to review the rule book”) 

 

  • Like 3
  • Love 1

Posted
5 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - dominated centre again

Pickett - needed more involvement 

Brown - showed some signs

Fritsch - had little influence 

Viney - game has passed

Petracca - prolific but uninspiring

McDonald - was rarely sighted

Oliver - incredible first half

Hunt - just a game

Neal-Bullen - prolific but ineffective 

May - playing under duress

Salem - couldn’t get involved 

Harmes - not a tagger

Jackson - hardly noticed again

Lever - solid 4 quarters

Spargo - went missing again

Brayshaw - loose and limited

Hibberd - little to commend

Langdon - energy was missing

Jordon - was he playing?

Rivers - hit the wall

Petty - was rarely noticed

 

 

Ok but totally biased against Viney.  Hit up Brown for a goal. Hit up Kozzy for a goal.  Kicked super goal in the third. 
Nine tackles. At the contest.  
3 words. 
“Very good game”. 

  • Like 21
  • Love 2
Posted

Free kick Bulldogs 

Umpires are cheats

[censored] you Gil

2016 happening again

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
  • Angry 1

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Ok but totally biased against Viney.  Hit up Brown for a goal. Hit up Kozzy for a goal.  Kicked super goal in the third. 
Nine tackles. At the contest.  
3 words. 
“Very good game”. 

Agree Viney average

Gawn no idea of where his mids are clueless ruckwork

Oliver..... sensational

Edited by picket fence
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Fritsch Dermie was right

Posted
26 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Be prepared to potentially take that back one the hit out to advantage stats are out.

Gawn had 16 (from 56, so 28.6%)

English had 3 from 14 (21.4%).

Jackson 3, McDonald 2.

  • Like 3

Posted
1 minute ago, titan_uranus said:

Gawn had 16 (from 56, so 28.6%)

English had 3 from 14 (21.4%).

Jackson 3, McDonald 2.

Thanks mate!

Where'd you find them btw?


Posted

Going on about umpiring like Essendon fans ignores the fact that we still should have run over the top of them but froze and fell to bits against a side one player down on the bench.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - dominated centre again

Pickett - needed more involvement 

Brown - showed some signs

Fritsch - had little influence 

Viney - game has passed

Petracca - prolific but uninspiring

McDonald - was rarely sighted

Oliver - incredible first half

Hunt - just a game

Neal-Bullen - prolific but ineffective 

May - playing under duress

Salem - couldn’t get involved 

Harmes - not a tagger

Jackson - hardly noticed again

Lever - solid 4 quarters

Spargo - went missing again

Brayshaw - loose and limited

Hibberd - little to commend

Langdon - energy was missing

Jordon - was he playing?

Rivers - hit the wall

Petty - was rarely noticed

 

 

Agree with most but not with Viney or Hunt both tried extremely hard and and we’re in our best.

  • Like 3
Posted

Gawn - Dominated hitouts department

Pickett - Costly early miss

Brown - Costly 2 behinds (and 1 on the full)

Fritsch - Above the knee

Viney - Better than r18

Petracca - Clangers superseded brilliance

McDonald - Lose more weight? (lol)

Oliver - Possible 2 votes

Hunt - 611 metres gained!

Neal-Bullen - Stop getting smothered

May - Some dumb FA's

Salem - Losing his AA 

Harmes - Didn't notice him

Jackson - Rising star slider

Lever - Our best defender

Spargo - Pressuring has declined

Brayshaw - Just a game

Hibberd - Not our worst

Langdon - Season low numbers

Jordon - costly dropped mark

Rivers - rookie soldiering on

Petty - always seems unlucky

Umpiring: A please explain

 

 

  • Love 2
Posted
48 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - dominated centre again

Pickett - needed more involvement 

Brown - showed some signs

Fritsch - had little influence 

Viney - game has passed

Petracca - prolific but uninspiring

McDonald - was rarely sighted

Oliver - incredible first half

Hunt - just a game

Neal-Bullen - prolific but ineffective 

May - playing under duress

Salem - couldn’t get involved 

Harmes - not a tagger

Jackson - hardly noticed again

Lever - solid 4 quarters

Spargo - went missing again

Brayshaw - loose and limited

Hibberd - little to commend

Langdon - energy was missing

Jordon - was he playing?

Rivers - hit the wall

Petty - was rarely noticed

 

 

Disagree with many

trac was very good

petty and Rivers solid

hunt was good

Browns first half was poor but he did show signs in the second. But the damage was done by then

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - dominated centre again

Pickett - needed more involvement 

Brown - showed some signs

Fritsch - had little influence 

Viney - game has passed

Petracca - prolific but uninspiring

McDonald - was rarely sighted

Oliver - incredible first half

Hunt - just a game

Neal-Bullen - prolific but ineffective 

May - playing under duress

Salem - couldn’t get involved 

Harmes - not a tagger

Jackson - hardly noticed again

Lever - solid 4 quarters

Spargo - went missing again

Brayshaw - loose and limited

Hibberd - little to commend

Langdon - energy was missing

Jordon - was he playing?

Rivers - hit the wall

Petty - was rarely noticed

 

 

There’s no way the game has passed Viney, proved again what he will do for the club, was in and under all night. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Posted
9 hours ago, Clintosaurus said:

Free kick Bulldogs 

Umpires are cheats

[censored] you Gil

2016 happening again

As I said during the week, the umpires will destroy our game chances, once again, through incorrect use of the whistle (in any way that they 'can get away with'). The attempt is made in every game the MFC plays.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Posted

We were In it all night. Midfield matched the dogs, Gawn dominant. 

We were wasteful in attack, again, they were not. 

We missed several gettable shots, they did not.

We failed to take our difficult chances, they did not. 

We got a rough ride from the umpires, they did not. 

Game over...

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2

Posted
9 hours ago, Supermercado said:

Going on about umpiring like Essendon fans ignores the fact that we still should have run over the top of them but froze and fell to bits against a side one player down on the bench.

Agree - had our chances, can';t kick straight.  BBB first two "attempts" were actually pathetic.

  • Like 2
Posted

It is inconceivable that WBD could break the rules only 11 times in 350 contests.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
  • Vomit 2
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Dee*ceiving said:

We were In it all night. Midfield matched the dogs, Gawn dominant. 

We were wasteful in attack, again, they were not. 

We missed several gettable shots, they did not.

We failed to take our difficult chances, they did not. 

We got a rough ride from the umpires, they did not. 

Game over...

It really does feel like a syndicated, 'old boys' conspiratory against the Dees, that many amongst us cannot for some reason accept or acknowledge. It has pressed us, for years; it is still pressing us after we have - as a footy club - re-organised and re-structured against the odds and expectations of 'the rest of them'. We live in hope, as a consequence. Will our Board ever do something about it? Nearly all of the consequences of last night's footy match against the Doggies were in the hands of the umpires and were so delivered across the game without sanction, excepting of course those few that were too blatant to be ignored. However, the power of the whistle applied and re-applied to quell the eveness of the game that would lead to a different end result.

 

Edited by Deemania since 56
  • Like 4
Posted

Player A,B,C,D, etc:   didn't handle conditions.

Lots of dumb kicks

Kicking straight into an opponent who earned a 'smother' stat without even waving their arms around - when does that get fun?

 

  • Like 1
  • Shocked 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...