Jump to content

Featured Replies

Arr the old 426. The weid and brown have been that for a couple of weeks. Does that mean they should have been listed as 628 or did the second language pop  it's head up again. 

 
8 hours ago, DubDee said:

Injury list form yesterday

PLAYER  INJURY   ESTIMATED RETURN

 Angus Brayshaw        Foot Test

 Ben Brown                   Knee 4-6 weeks

 Michael Hibberd         Ankle TBC

 Marty Hore                  Knee Season

 Jay Lockhart              [censored] TBC

 Steven May                Chest Test

 Jake Melksham         Hamstring Test

 Aaron Nietschke        Knee Season

 Christian Salem         Hamstring Test

 Joel Smith                  Finger Test

 Jack Viney                 Foot 2 weeks

 Sam Weideman        Leg 4-6 weeks

 

So assuming May plays on the magic 12th day we will definately be without Viney, Weed, B Brown and likely Hibberd

Brayshaw, Melksham, Salem will need to prove their fitness this weekend you'd imgaine

BAU, 10/12 on the player injury list. Same old same old. Will it ever change? 

Before round 1.  Light duties.  Running and running and more running only.  No contested work. No jumping.  No sharp objects. No cooking.  No heavy labour.  ???Break out the cotton wool imv. We need everyone fit and available.  

 

I'll get this out here now: think we're going to really struggle in at least the first part of this year. We've got our two main talls out of the forward line, so not only will they miss a lot of training, the crucial point is that the rest of the team will have missed a LOT of training with them. Systems? Mid-Forward connection? Forget it.

Add to that, similar comments for the absence of Kozzie, Brayshaw and Viney, where the lack of training time together will have consequences on the whole team, regardless of how the individuals can get back into shape.

Finally, throw a few others into a similar basket: Melksham and Hibberd, but also players like Salem.

Sure, we can eventually get these players back on the field. But we can never make up for the lost training TOGETHER.

10 minutes ago, bing181 said:

I'll get this out here now: think we're going to really struggle in at least the first part of this year. We've got our two main talls out of the forward line, so not only will they miss a lot of training, the crucial point is that the rest of the team will have missed a LOT of training with them. Systems? Mid-Forward connection? Forget it.

Add to that, similar comments for the absence of Kozzie, Brayshaw and Viney, where the lack of training time together will have consequences on the whole team, regardless of how the individuals can get back into shape.

Finally, throw a few others into a similar basket: Melksham and Hibberd, but also players like Salem.

Sure, we can eventually get these players back on the field. But we can never make up for the lost training TOGETHER.

Agree 100%. Just don’t see how we can kick a winning score with the outs we have. Wouldn’t be surprised if we are 0/6, then the season is gone. We just don’t have the depth to cover. Depressing.


3 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Darren Burgess must be on long service leave

Ah yes, the Great Messiah. Fitness staff, totally over rated.

Not a good situation Re injuries with 10 days to go to Round 1. There are some critical players that are uncertain.

From the list above I think that the following players will definately line up:

Oliver - rested on Monday

Salem - Hammy twinge a lot of time to get it right from the time of injury

May - 12 day protocol, good to go if reports are correct and he ha no adverse reactions.

The following players need to play the VFL practicce match coming up to have a chance of being there Round 1:

Brayshaw - Played on Monday. will benefit from the run

Hibberd - Needs the run may not have the fitness for R1

Melksham - see Hibberd

Smith - see Hibberd

Viney to miss R1 should be good to go after that.

Brown/Wiedeman - 426 weeks Posted when? May be ready for round 3 to 5?

The other three out for season or indefinately.

My take? Hibberd, Melksham and Smith will not be ready for R1. the rest should be ok.

4 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

  PLAYER INJURY LENGTH
BRAYSHAW Angus.png Angus Brayshaw Foot Test
HIBBERD Michael.png Michael Hibberd Ankle Test
MAY Steven.png Steven May Concussion Test
MELKSHAM Jake.png Jake Melksham Hamstring Test
OLIVER Clayton.png Clayton Oliver Soreness Test
SALEM Christian.png Christian Salem Hamstring Test
SMITH Joel.png Joel Smith Finger Test
VINEY Jack.png Jack Viney Foot 1-2 Weeks
BROWN Ben.png Ben Brown Knee 4-6 Weeks
WEIDEMAN Sam.png Sam Weideman Leg 4-6 Weeks
LOCKHART Jay.png Jay Lockhart Testicles Indefinite
HORE Marty.png Marty Hore Knee Season
NIETSCHKE Aaron.png Aaron Nietschke Knee Season

 

Big list. Always seems to be the same players eg, Weideman, Viney, Smith. 

 

3 best 22 players injured for round 1. Viney back for round 2

that leave two injured players. 

no excuses demons. These blokes have played together enough. Time for regular finals


2 hours ago, CHF said:

My take? Hibberd, Melksham and Smith will not be ready for R1. the rest should be ok

Getting them on the field is only half of it.

12 minutes ago, bing181 said:

Getting them on the field is only half of it.

Agree with that but I do not see them as critical longer term players.

11 hours ago, bobby1554 said:

Ah yes, the Great Messiah. Fitness staff, totally over rated.

How exactly are fitness staff to blame for players getting injured?  What are they doing wrong?

Some people seem to be laying the ground work for a 'pre-season, injury based excuse' in case we don't do well in 2021.

And at first glance the injury list doesn't look good.  But on closer inspection:

  • 7 of our best/better players are 'Test'.  .
  • 4 of those:  J.  Smith, Salem, Oliver and May have completed all the pre-season.  
  • The other 3:  Brayshaw, Hibberd and Melksham have many pre-seasons under their belt so match practice may be an issue for just the first few games but not a reason to derail the season.
  • Brayshaw last week played and is playing in the VFL this week.
  • Those 7 players and Viney are highly experienced and have played together for years so if they don't know and practiced each others games or know the overall game plan by now we are in a world of hurt. 
  • Picket, Weidemen and B. Brown have missed the second half of the preseason.  Picket will take some time to get into the season and we will miss Weidemen and Brown for quite a while.
  • The others are depth players who probably wouldn't get a game unless there were multiple injuries in their role. 

So, imv the injury list size and some players not practicing together in this preason are not a reason to start thinking of excuses for the year.

Some perspective is required.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

30 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Some people seem to be laying the ground work for a 'pre-season, injury based excuse' in case we don't do well in 2021.

And at first glance the injury list doesn't look good.  But on closer inspection:

  • 7 of our best/better players are 'Test'.  .
  • 4 of those:  J.  Smith, Salem, Oliver and May have completed all the pre-season.  
  • The other 3:  Brayshaw, Hibberd and Melksham have many pre-seasons under their belt so match practice may be an issue for just the first few games but not a reason to derail the season.
  • Brayshaw last week played and is playing in the VFL this week.
  • Those 7 players and Viney are highly experienced and have played together for years so if they don't know and practiced each others games or know the overall game plan by now we are in a world of hurt. 
  • Picket, Weidemen and B. Brown have missed the second half of the preseason.  Picket will take some time to get into the season and we will miss Weidemen and Brown for quite a while.
  • The others are depth players who probably wouldn't get a game unless there were multiple injuries in their role. 

So, imv the injury list size and some players not practicing together in this preason are not a reason to start thinking of excuses for the year.

Some perspective is required.

You are 95% correct LH. Thanks for given me a wee bit more confidence. 


1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Some people seem to be laying the ground work for a 'pre-season, injury based excuse' in case we don't do well in 2021.

So, imv the injury list size and some players not practicing together in this preason are not a reason to start thinking of excuses for the year.

Some perspective is required.

If true, then we'll just have to come up with another excuse.

I think we can reasonably expect to add Oliver, Brayshaw, Melksham, Salem and Pickett to the team that played the Dogs - they are some handy ins.

I'm not sure where the Hibberd "test" is coming from - he's listed as "TBA" on the AFL website and seems to have been in rehab for an extended period so I'm not expecting him to play early.

Edited by Pollyanna

39 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

I think we can reasonably expect to add Oliver, Brayshaw, Melksham, Salem and Pickett to the team that played the Dogs - they are some handy ins.

I'm not sure where the Hibberd "test" is coming from - he's listed as "TBA" on the AFL website and seems to have been in rehab for an extended period so I'm not expecting him to play early.

Yes, certainly some very handy ins.  My guess is most teams will be lacking match practice in the early games in part because of the shorter preseason and in part lack of practice games.  So we shouldn't be too rusty in comparison to say Freo or the Saints who we play in the early rounds.

Not sure Hibberd is in our starting 22 anymore so I don't mind if he isn't available for a while.  We play Salem, Rivers and maybe Bowey/Jetta/J.Smith until he is fit enough to play regularly.    

2 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

 I pray to the almighty gods that there is a VFL practice game this week and Melk, Hibbo and Angus can get a full game in before round 1.

There is a game this week V's Box Hill.

You'd imagine Melksham will play this week as he did most of the training yesterday and if Brayshaw gets through ok, he'll certainly play round 1. Melksham maybe for round 2.

Hibberd was in full training yesterday according to reports but has been in rehab the entire pre season so a round 3-4 return looks more likely you'd think.

 


3 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

There is a game this week V's Box Hill.

You'd imagine Melksham will play this week as he did most of the training yesterday and if Brayshaw gets through ok, he'll certainly play round 1. Melksham maybe for round 2.

Hibberd was in full training yesterday according to reports but has been in rehab the entire pre season so a round 3-4 return looks more likely you'd think.

 

Thats good news.  Might have all three ready vs Freo.

 
On 3/8/2021 at 8:07 PM, dazzledavey36 said:

Disappointing to hear...he's body just doesn't seem.up to the rigours of AFL footy.

It is disappointing, he does have much to offer our team when played in the correct position with teammates who, using eyes-up, bother to see him in forward line space(s) and when on a lead, or clear from an opponent, can mark and kick through the big sticks quite bluddey well. Hope he recovers from this set-back, well. He should be better used - he is the play maker type, not suited to throwing himself into the fray recklessly. 

 

17 hours ago, bing181 said:

I'll get this out here now: think we're going to really struggle in at least the first part of this year. We've got our two main talls out of the forward line, so not only will they miss a lot of training, the crucial point is that the rest of the team will have missed a LOT of training with them. Systems? Mid-Forward connection? Forget it.

Add to that, similar comments for the absence of Kozzie, Brayshaw and Viney, where the lack of training time together will have consequences on the whole team, regardless of how the individuals can get back into shape.

Finally, throw a few others into a similar basket: Melksham and Hibberd, but also players like Salem.

Sure, we can eventually get these players back on the field. But we can never make up for the lost training TOGETHER.

Good teams train and play systems so you don’t struggle nearly as much when integrating individuals. 

The majority of the back 7 have trained together over the summer, and played together last year. Same goes for Gawn and experienced mids even if they are mixing up their systems with a new assistant coach. The injuries shouldn’t be an excuse for the backline set up or clearance problems. 

I agree with you on the key forwards. The silver lining is they’ve been out for long enough that Tom and rucks have taken their places and had time and match practice in that role. It will certainly be a challenge trying to bring them back from injury. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie? 
    Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG. Unfortunately, performances like these went against the grain of what Melbourne has been producing from virtually midway through 2024 and extending right through to the present day. This is a game between two clubs who have faltered over the past couple of years because their disposal efficiency is appalling. Neither of them can hit the side of a barn door but history tells us that every once in a while such teams have their lucky days or come up against an opponent in even worse shape and hence, one of them will come up trumps in this match.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Like
    • 258 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 17 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Shocked
      • Like
    • 273 replies
    Demonland