Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, DeeZee said:

Collingwood apparently making some inquiries about TMac

Straight swap for Phillips could be on the cards, both go into the trade period with reasonable contracts hanging over their heads and it's known that the pies want a more mobile forward and we're after a wing. So both cover a need for the respective clubs, while costings shouldn't be too much of an issue. Both have a few question marks hanging over them, but if they are able to get sorted could end up being a classic win-win trade. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Love 1


Posted
29 minutes ago, wheaters31 said:

Grain of salt needed given the source, but........

194718121_ScreenShot2020-10-21at5_44_29pm.png.1df5894e3283d73316deed5a7cf4ba40.png

GWS or Sydney?

Posted
On 10/16/2020 at 11:19 AM, Red and Blue realist said:

Straight swap for Phillips could be on the cards, both go into the trade period with reasonable contracts hanging over their heads and it's known that the pies want a more mobile forward and we're after a wing. So both cover a need for the respective clubs, while costings shouldn't be too much of an issue. Both have a few question marks hanging over them, but if they are able to get sorted could end up being a classic win-win trade. 

Surely McDonald has more trade value than Phillips.  

  • Like 1

Posted

The Swans could do with a big body to protect their young keys.
 

Buddy is pretty much retired


Posted

Think I saw somewhere that it was GWS. They’ve said they aren’t interested in Brown, maybe we could work T Mac into Preuss deal.

  • Like 1
Posted

T-Mac stopped in to use the facilities of another team whilst in Sydney ? As long as he left a big jobby and didn't flush it's fine by me. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Posted (edited)
On 10/16/2020 at 11:12 AM, DeeZee said:

Collingwood apparently making some inquiries about TMac

Heard about interest over a month ago, long before it hit the press, so it might have some legs. Heard from the Pies end, not ours.

Edited by Dees247
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

SEN saying he might stay (not sure how we do that and take Brown).  GWS showing new interest in TMac with Cameron's departure.

Edit:  would be interesting to see how a Preuss/TMac trade could be leveraged to off load all TMac's salary and take a more moderate draft pick in return for the two.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero
  • Thanks 2
Posted

GWS makes some sense, in that they will have the room to take him on and a spot in their side with both Cameron and Corr moving on.

No idea what the club wants in return, but I'm sure we can package McDonald and Preuss together and get something we could on trade to North for Brown in return.


Posted
4 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

GWS makes some sense, in that they will have the room to take him on and a spot in their side with both Cameron and Corr moving on.

No idea what the club wants in return, but I'm sure we can package McDonald and Preuss together and get something we could on trade to North for Brown in return.

GWS are interested because they might give us an inflated pick but the MFC will still need to pick up a good whack of TMacs wage.  The way players are leaving GWS they are going to have a few first and second round picks, they have really struggled to manage their salary cap to get a player like Tom with MFC paying some of his wage is a bonus for them.

Buddle Tmac and Preuss up and go after the pick 7 they will get from Carlton, might need to add in a few pick swaps in the second or third round to make this happen but it could.

Posted

I don't care where he goes as long as he goes I want Ben.Brown.

  • Like 1
  • Shocked 1
Posted

There is the slim possibility that we sign Ben Brown, and then Tmac re-discovers his 2018 orm and we suddenly have a great forward 2 punch combo. 


Posted

I assume we'll agree to trade T Mac after Brown has made his decison and not before.

Would be a bit foolish by the club to have neither on the list, unless they're relying on Mitch Brown to get his 15 marks and 2 Brownlow votes a game (per round 18)


Posted

Someone suggested the value of the picks in return for T Mac might be reduced the more the other team is prepared to pay of his contract with us. 

Posted
49 minutes ago, It's Time said:

Someone suggested the value of the picks in return for T Mac might be reduced the more the other team is prepared to pay of his contract with us. 

and i have absolutely no issues with that at all, a clean break is all we're after here so the closer we can get to that salary wise the better

  • Like 1
Posted

If this GWS story is true massive for Dees. We should be moving heaven and earth to get Brown. TMac has been a great servant but he is part of our problem not part of our solution 

Posted

The swans are also showing some interest in T’Mac. They wanted him when he was out of contract. Again we will be getting very little compensation by way of a trade but it’s a salary dump situation. 

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dr evil said:

The swans are also showing some interest in T’Mac. They wanted him when he was out of contract. Again we will be getting very little compensation by way of a trade but it’s a salary dump situation. 

Doesn't worry me that we are getting little back. The compensation out of this trade will be the signing of Ben Brown.

  • Like 12

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...