Jump to content

Featured Replies

11 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Wow. This is a totally different side

Now get them fired up

First 5 minutes of the game will tell us a lot

Suits game plan, if we are bombing long we need the forward pressure to keep it in there.  Pickett, Bedford, Hunt front and square pressure to keep the inside forward 50m.  We look balanced except for second tall forward that Preuss fills, the mix is a lot better 

 

 
4 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Yes, correct. Mate of mine, who's a big Dees fan, has a close knit business group with a bunch of former Demons. They have a busy group chat where they talk about MFC. One of the former players is till involved with the club a bit and passed on some things Burgess told him including the Bennell management and that Burgo is a big fan of Petty.

TBH don't care anymore if posters who seem to have willy measuring contests here believe me or not.

Same person passed on Friday morning that Brayshaw and Harmes were injured, which I posted here and came out correct. Didn't see you reply to that post though strangely enough.

 

One of the former players is till involved with the club a bit and passed on some things Burgess told him

1. So you're saying selection confidential info is being leaked

Same person passed on Friday morning that Brayshaw and Harmes were injured,

2. Hardly earth shattering but , in any event , if you throw enough [censored],  some will stick to the wall.

 

The 7 changes will hopefully freshen them up.  We have had a hectic schedule of late. 
 

1 hour ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Finally get to see Baker and Bedford.

Bennell is really on the outer.

WTF FRITSCH & MELKSHAM stay?? Beggars belief, Mark this down..we will NEVER be any good with these two Downhill skiers in the side.

Goody doesn't play favourites eh?? Bultish!!

Edited by picket fence


8 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

Weren't you saying 'oh dear' to the seven changes just a few pages ago?

Yep, a general exclamation, i couldn't believe it!

I think Omissions are right and a big fan of Preuss, Hunt, Pickett, Baker, Bedford as the INs (given AvB, Hibbo are more a given)

Finally a fast team

Edited by Graeme Yeats' Mullet

28 minutes ago, Demonland said:

These condensed fixtures have made it even harder to keep track of time.

And now not being allowed out until after the grand final.... great news ?

 
48 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

Not a fan of the Preuss inclusion, but... I'd rather look at what I think are the positives.

Baker, Bedford and Hunt will bring some much needed pace to the side.  While they aren't big possession winners, they bring that dash and excitement we need.  Same goes for the inclusion of Pickett.  Some real pace, dash and hopefully pressure.

Hibberd back is really handy too.

Only disappointing aspect is no Lockhart - did he pee in Goody's tea or something?

And smith has the goat photos?

50 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Clearly Max is going to play a lot of the game up forward. 

Hope not his goalkicking ages me


Anyone know if Freo will be flying on the day of the game? It’s not an excusing for our pathetic performance last match but there can’t be much doubt that it plays an impact to fitness. The fact they’ve gone in with no changes could actually benefit us. 

I really do think they’ve taken a management approach to some of our changes for this match. Bringing some pace to the line up perhaps to outrun Freo, of course number one is getting clean hands on the ball and then using the bloody thing well!

55 minutes ago, Hogan2014 said:

2 ruckman...  what’s the future for Tom Mac 

Package himself and Brother Oscar of for whatever you can get for them.!

A lot of changes,  good,  but would it not have been better to rotate some of these players 3 rounds ago !!

Seems like deckchairs on the Titanic doing it all at once, !

The changes look ok on paper.  Other than Sam I doubt if the rest of the fwds have kicked many more than a dozen goals between them.

Neal-Bullen,  Weideman, vandenBerg, Pickett, Fritsch, Melksham, Bedford, Preuss??

That is not an AFL fwd line.  It isn't even a VFL fwd line.

I know they may not line up that way but other than Petracca our mids don't kick goals either.

Its good to see some speed but who is going to kick the goals. 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

Even this late in the season we are still looking for the right mix.


2 minutes ago, Pates said:

Anyone know if Freo will be flying on the day of the game? It’s not an excusing for our pathetic performance last match but there can’t be much doubt that it plays an impact to fitness. The fact they’ve gone in with no changes could actually benefit us. 

I really do think they’ve taken a management approach to some of our changes for this match. Bringing some pace to the line up perhaps to outrun Freo, of course number one is getting clean hands on the ball and then using the bloody thing well!

Freo flew up with us the other day.

We were forced to wait for them...thus us flying on game day

Curious about Preuss for Brown. Are we going to do something different with Gawn?

Maybe Preuss tasked with crashing packs for the smalls, and perhaps Gawn to do the same up forward.

Edited by Rogue

10 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

One of the former players is till involved with the club a bit and passed on some things Burgess told him

1. So you're saying selection confidential info is being leaked

Same person passed on Friday morning that Brayshaw and Harmes were injured,

2. Hardly earth shattering but , in any event , if you throw enough [censored],  some will stick to the wall.

You're welcome to point out all the times I've "thrown [censored]" and it hasn't stuck. I always put my hand up when I get one wrong.

Here's a running list for you:

Jennings gone - Correct
McCartney gone - Correct
Dees chasing Yze - Correct
Looking at drafting Jackson - Correct
Weideman injury - Correct
Max Gawn lat injury - Correct
Jake Lever injury - Correct
Bennell leaving Freo - Correct
TMac injury - Correct
Dees not chasing Hill, rate the top end of draft higher - Correct
Dees looking to split 2019 picks - Correct

Bennell selection for Freo - Incorrect
Rooke gone - Incorrect (Rawlings leaving possibly changed it)
Pendlebury late out - Incorrect (Different source, no good)
Roos taking a role at Blues - Incorrect. (Though did come out and say he was open to it)

Mahoney likely gone end of year - We’ll see
Goodwin gone if doesn’t win 9 games - We’ll see
Harmes unhappy and likely to request trade - We’ll see
TMac ankle injury - We’ll see

Gotta be a pretty lucky "[censored] thrower" to get that many random guesses correct hey?

If you don't want to read what I post, just block me, that's what I'll be doing now to save myself wasting time with your personal trash.

Edited by Lord Nev

Wow desperate times call for desperate changes. 
 

At this time of the season it would be good to see maybe 1-2 changes but this shows how bad we are going and how desperate the coach and selection committee are. 
 

Their selections over the season have been questionable and I have basically no confidence in the coach or selection committee know what the best player mix is which they SHOULD know by now. 

Edited by DemonOX

I doubt they would make a selection decision that far out from a game.

Id say it would have to have been conditional on Bennells fitness and form

Edited by DeeZee


5 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Freo flew up with us the other day.

We were forced to wait for them...thus us flying on game day

Gotta love the way the AFL have really helped us out this year. ?

8 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Jayden Hunt last chance to save his career.  Wonder what position he will play....

I would think that Jaidyn Hunt is only one of a few that are playing for their careers this game.

Shame about Brown I thought he played his role early on against the Swans but seems to lack consistency.

Melksham does provide some block for Weideman but needs to use both hands to get the ball himself.

The team seems to lack enthusiasm for the game and it is shown in the stats. We are a confirmed clearance, contested ball team who has great numbers of I50's. All of these KPI's are well down. Tackle numbers are embarassing. Our inclusions for this week don't seem to have a history of numbers to improve those team stats but they may have enthusiasm.

 

 

 

 
1 hour ago, Hogan2014 said:

2 ruckman...  what’s the future for Tom Mac 

Samw as Jones probably.

Sad young Jordan is injured.

Edited by Unleash Hell

1 hour ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Finally get to see Baker and Bedford.

Bennell is really on the outer.

At least Jayden Hunt is back,  I like this one.

Edited by Jibroni


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Haha
    • 188 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 533 replies