Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, Megatron said:

Haha. Clearly not going by this article.Ā 

Have a read and educate yourself. Remember this article was in 2017. His last year with the crows in which he played a pivotal role in them making it to the Grand Final and why we paid what we did.Ā 

https://www.afl.com.au/news/121080/why-are-clubs-so-keen-to-lure-jake-lever

He was terrific at the crows. A big part of his success was big able to focus solely on the the intercept role and not have to be accountable for adirect oppoent. And the reason he was able to play that role and rack up all thoseĀ sexy intercept stats was the rest of the defence doing their job, in particularĀ Thalia. The system they employed also supported him playing that role -Ā  one that involved not being accountable for an opponent. Exactly the role he plays for usĀ . I can't recall the name of the fella but when Lever left he slotted into that role and also looked great.Ā 

That article (which reads like his manager wrote it) suggest he is heir apparent to Rance. Don't get me wrong i think he is good player, but he is not in Rance's league. And wont ever be, To be fair few are. But that is what we were hoping to get.Ā 

Of course the knee injury made thingsĀ hard to assess but he is poor kick and for defender, very poor one on one. These deficiencies are not a function of his knee injury and were apparent at the crows.

Saw that tonight. No way Rance lets Cripps take that mark (the one he missed)Ā 

Ā 
55 minutes ago, whitito said:

Yes, I would finish a guy who is coming off an unprecedented break???!!!Touch was always going to be a problem, and this has been commonĀ across the league. Dusty Martin looked out of touch and shape. The hyperbole on here is laughable

Hasn't looked the same for 18 months, why is this hyperbole? Your clearly a soft touch accepting these sorts of efforts.

Edited by Win4theAges

2 minutes ago, Half forward flank said:

No need to tell me to educte myself. As it happens the summary is by a non event journo and talks about a nine game period in one year.Ā  Comparing him to Rance and McGovern is and was laughable. They were key defenders, Lever a third tall.Ā  Fool journos like this one were exactly what pumped up his asking price. Makes you wonder.

You said stats don’t lie about him being overrated.Ā I’m just showing you an article to show you he’s not. Lever is an intercept player. He led the league at that point in intercept marks. Even in 2016 he was up there in the top few and that was his second year of footy. 2017 was even better and he was only 21 then. He’s only just turned 24 now.Ā 
Give him and the back line a few games togetherĀ before making comments like that.Ā 

 
1 hour ago, dieter said:

Yes, only watched highlights, glad I have a dog which needs regular dog park frolics, because otherwise I'd have been on the roller coast ride fromĀ Ā heaven and back. The highlights of the second half show the same old bulldust of three Melbourne players flying for marks, no-one at the bottom to mop up. I ask myself, why does this keep happening????It's like checking your Tattslotto ticket every Saturday night and finding your numbers are bulldust. The same with our back line.Ā 

Those tall backs are going to need time to learn to work as one. That's the best hope I can offer.

1 hour ago, binman said:

I rate Smith. But he was flat out terrible today.Ā 

Melk can be a good player. But more often than not isn't. Like today. And personally it is that type of player I hate the most. Talent but pick and choose when to use it, with a dose of infuriating arrogance thrown in, type of player.

Anb is exactly the opposite. Not the most talented but his level of effort and desire never drops. That is the sort of player I like.

Then you get a player like cripps who combine talent, consistency and work rate. The true stars. How many of these do we have? Realistically only gawn and tracc.Ā 

I thought Clarry had the better of the battle with CrippsĀ until Cripps moved off him to the forward line.


8 minutes ago, Megatron said:

You said stats don’t lie about him being overrated.Ā I’m just showing you an article to show you he’s not. Lever is an intercept player. He led the league at that point in intercept marks. Even in 2016 he was up there in the top few and that was his second year of footy. 2017 was even better and he was only 21 then. He’s only just turned 24 now.Ā 
Give him and the back line a few games togetherĀ before making comments like that.Ā 

You gave stats for 9 games.Ā  36 marks.Ā  Who would recruit anyone based on being an intercept mark. What does that stat even mean?Ā Ā 

Turned 24 a couple of months ago, still a ways off 100 games. Not even a seasons worth with us yet.

Reckon there's a fair few going a little too early here.

Ā 

15 minutes ago, Megatron said:

You said stats don’t lie about him being overrated.Ā I’m just showing you an article to show you he’s not. Lever is an intercept player. He led the league at that point in intercept marks. Even in 2016 he was up there in the top few and that was his second year of footy. 2017 was even better and he was only 21 then. He’s only just turned 24 now.Ā 
Give him and the back line a few games togetherĀ before making comments like that.Ā 

Sam Frost and your Lever

Lever 5.5 marks per game career average

Sam Frost 5.3 per game career average

I like Frosty but he is just a battler and has as good a stats as Lever. Hope I am wrong but never liked this deal. Two first round picks..

Ā 

Ā 

We essentially gave up Lachie O'Brien & Liam Stocker for Lever

Not the worst thing ever but still no player is worth that unless theyĀ are elite.Ā 

It was the IT thing to do trade two first round picks.

Thought he was okay in first half.

The whole backline was dysfunctionalĀ 

May, Lever & Smith all flying for the same ball. Cost us 2 or 3 goals on poor positioning.

27 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

I thought Clarry had the better of the battle with CrippsĀ until Cripps moved off him to the forward line.

Agree. But Oliver has got a way to go to get nearĀ Cripps as a player.

CrippsĀ imposed himself on the game in that last quarterĀ and almost won it for them. That's what the real stars find a way to do. Oliver is not there yet.Ā 


Yes today was not too good for Lever. Glad that he got through and will be better with May and Jetta once they play more together. Ā Lever will be better.Ā 
Ā 

We gave two 1st round picks for an intercept defender. Ā Not sure he’s worth that or the $600k price tag.Ā 

25 minutes ago, Half forward flank said:

Sam Frost and your Lever

Lever 5.5 marks per game career average

Sam Frost 5.3 per game career average

I like Frosty but he is just a battler and has as good a stats as Lever. Hope I am wrong but never liked this deal. Two first round picks..

Jeremy Howe walking out has cost us a lot in retrospect. We would not have needed to chase Lever as an intercept back and instead would have taken our first rounders. So far Lever is just a player, hope this changes.Ā 

The problem with Lever isn't his ability. It's his role within our defensive unit overall.

Like almost every player in the league, he has weaknesses, and they get exploited when:

  1. 2-3 of Smith, May, Jetta and Lever jump at the same ball;
  2. May and others shank kicks coming outside of the back 50, opening us up on a quick rebound;
  3. our mids/forwards don't put the requisite level of pressure on the opposition, meaning they get to pick and choose who they're kicking to.

Lever is essential to holding our defensive unit together but when the other cogs break down, he does too. He isn't very good one-on-one but if we're playing well, he doesn't end up one-on-one very often and the ball isn't coming in to our opposition forwards' advantage.

He can do better, but there are much more significant issues in our midfield and forward line than there is with Lever.

1 minute ago, Earl Hood said:

Jeremy Howe walking out has cost us a lot in retrospect. We would not have needed to chase Lever as an intercept back and instead would have taken our first rounders. So far Lever is just a player, hope this changes.Ā 

One of the biggest failures of the Roos era - being unable to convince Howe he was a defender and making sure the club saw his value as such. Given his desire to be a forward I wasn't too upset we effectively swapped him for Hibberd who was a better kick and more reliable at the time, but what I'd give for him now.

Still, I can't believe our lack of success drafting and developing defenders the last few years. We've paid a lot for May and Lever and how many have we drafted Petty, Hore, Lockhart, Joel Smith. Should be taking athletic/competitiveĀ talents every year and developing them. It was refreshing to see Rivers come in and look comfortable.


11 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

One of the biggest failures of the Roos era - being unable to convince Howe he was a defender and making sure the club saw his value as such. Given his desire to be a forward I wasn't too upset we effectively swapped him for Hibberd who was a better kick and more reliable at the time, but what I'd give for him now.

Still, I can't believe our lack of success drafting and developing defenders the last few years. We've paid a lot for May and Lever and how many have we drafted Petty, Hore, Lockhart, Joel Smith. Should be taking athletic/competitiveĀ talents every year and developing them. It was refreshing to see Rivers come in and look comfortable.

Losing Howe for sure and you add Hogan as well. I know we got May but that is still a long way from a win and I dont think his value is asĀ  a deep back taking kick outs. Then you add OMac and one of thoseĀ two brothers

7 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

The problem with Lever isn't his ability. It's his role within our defensive unit overall.

Like almost every player in the league, he has weaknesses, and they get exploited when:

  1. 2-3 of Smith, May, Jetta and Lever jump at the same ball;
  2. May and others shank kicks coming outside of the back 50, opening us up on a quick rebound;
  3. our mids/forwards don't put the requisite level of pressure on the opposition, meaning they get to pick and choose who they're kicking to.

Lever is essential to holding our defensive unit together but when the other cogs break down, he does too. He isn't very good one-on-one but if we're playing well, he doesn't end up one-on-one very often and the ball isn't coming in to our opposition forwards' advantage.

He can do better, but there are much more significant issues in our midfield and forward line than there is with Lever.

Love this post. It’s as much structure as anything. If everyone pulls their weight and we lock it inside 50 or slow the opposition’s ball movement, Lever repels everything by peeling off and spoiling/marking. Yet, when it breaks down badly it becomes like the early 2010s when good defenders such as Rivers and Frawley were standing hands on hips watching the opposition amass a cricket score against us.Ā 

Not sure we’ve quite got the backline mix together yet to exploit Lever’s talents, however, it’s all moot until those up the ground put some pressure on.Ā 

13 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

What exactly is his role in this team?

We gave up two 1st round draft picks for someone plays zero accountable football.

Needs to give more.

After all pick swaps, it equated to a pick 10. I'd take Lever for 10. That was the whole point in 17', we needed proven defenders, not a speculative kid

Edited by John Demonic

ALL LEVER NEEDS TO DO IS SHAVE OFF THE YMCAĀ MO WHICH HE COPIED FROM TEX WALKER.

MAYBE SWAP SMITH AND MCDONALD.

13 hours ago, binman said:

I rate Smith. But he was flat out terrible today.Ā 

Why?

He proved yet again he is a poor decision maker & not up to the hype.

It seems his only role is to try and take the mark of this century to keep it in the family.

Frost II.


1 hour ago, John Demonic said:

After all pick swaps, it equated to a pick 10. I'd take Lever for 10. That was the whole point in 17', we needed proven defenders, not a speculative kid

I understand there was a pick 19 for the following year we gave up. As to pick 10, Lachie OBrien has stats equal to lever over the same period being paid a lot less.Ā Ā 

13 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

One of the biggest failures of the Roos era - being unable to convince Howe he was a defender and making sure the club saw his value as such.

Same for LDunn;Ā  early on when he was being pushed to defence.Ā Ā  Almost exactly the same.

This to me says, those players were putting their own interest,Ā  ahead of the teams interests.Ā  And so,Ā  I am not surprised they no longer are wearing RednBlue jumpers. This says a lot about our inside culture of the players,Ā  back then.

Ā 

More take, and less giving.Ā Ā Ā  A ring of greed and self, around the club.Ā Ā  A subtle one,Ā  but it is there.

Robbie Flower had a huge effect on this club,Ā  when he was there.

Gee... didn't think he was terrible yesterday or in round one.

Thought he got his fist to plenty of balls and killed the contest as the third man up.

There was a couple of times that he went to spoil where he could have taken that mark, but that would have to be team rules.

Ā 
17 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

What exactly is his role in this team?

We gave up two 1st round draft picks for someone plays zero accountable football.

Needs to give more.

One week in a football career he intercepts well and feeds out the ball adequately; the next week he is unsighted and gets no feeds for other players. That ain't what we paid for; neither is it what he owes us after expensive remediation and heaps of trust at the selection table. We have juniors who could learn such a craft and who could execute these skills far better.

3 hours ago, Every Game in '64 said:

ALL LEVER NEEDS TO DO IS SHAVE OFF THE YMCAĀ MO WHICH HE COPIED FROM TEX WALKER.

MAYBE SWAP SMITH AND MCDONALD.

Definitely swap Smith and McDonald. Smith needs to 'flank' it on the forward line, however.Ā 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Ā Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 528 replies