Jump to content

POLL 259 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the Demons split their Pick 3 by trading it for 2 First Round Picks

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

 

I think picks can get traded up to and including draft night so I wouldn't expect a deal today....

 

 
1 minute ago, DubDee said:

Nothing happening I reckon

office crew GIF


I'd rather 6 and a player than 3, if we can get someone who is best 22. 

 

Gees I hope we keep 3 and 8 and get 2 very good players.   those that think it takes 3-5 years to see dividends, think about Stephenson, Miers, Walsh, Rozee, etc etc.  an injection of pace and youth is critical for us right now

Looking forward to seeing what Josh “Kevin Costner” Mahoney can pull out of his hat.


40 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

Looking forward to seeing what Josh “Kevin Costner” Mahoney can pull out of his hat.

Is Josh thinning?

50 minutes ago, drdrake said:

What about 7, 10, 22 from Fremantle for 3 and 8 

 

images (30).jpeg

52 minutes ago, drdrake said:

What about 7, 10, 22 from Fremantle for 3 and 8 

What about 7, 10, Brayshaw from Fremantle for 3 and 8 ?


This would be my ideal scenario.

Out: Pick 3

In: Pick 6, Future 1st, and one of Hately, Caldwell or O'halloran.

Can't see any further picks from GWS satisfying us. We don't get a player we like then I'd be happy to just go to the draft with 3 and 8 and force GWS to pay for Green with Pick 3. Can't really lose.

Given the lateness of how things are going and that we haven't heard any players being mentioned in potential trades I can't see a trade involving players happening.

I'd love us to pick up another player that walks into our starting 18 but it just seems unlikely now.

Mohoney Just spotted entering trade center shown on fox said we were offered 6 and next year's first for our 3 and we turned it down, could be up to something 

Edited by Rednblueriseing

5 minutes ago, Rednblueriseing said:

Mohoney Just spotted entering trade center shown on fox said we were offered 6 and next year's first for our 3 and we turned it down, could be up to something 

Thank god we turned it down. Hopefully we don’t change our mind. 

7 minutes ago, Rednblueriseing said:

Mohoney Just spotted entering trade center shown on fox said we were offered 6 and next year's first for our 3 and we turned it down, could be up to something 

Definitely gotta play hardball on this pick, and dropped some very pointed hints that we may nominate Green to really make them worried.


Absolutely.  We should nominate Green at pick 3 if the Giants don’t offer a good deal.  Why not! He’s worth it. 
Dees should squeeze the Giants.  
Trade deal allows Giants to get a top youngster Plus Tom Green.  They would also be big winners.  

7 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Absolutely.  We should nominate Green at pick 3 if the Giants don’t offer a good deal.  Why not! He’s worth it. 
Dees should squeeze the Giants.  
Trade deal allows Giants to get a top youngster Plus Tom Green.  They would also be big winners.  

It also moves our pick 8 one spot if we bid on Green.

 
8 minutes ago, Parmalove said:

Mahoney has entered the room.  Wouldn't be there for no reason 

His there for the after party


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 62 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 304 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies