Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

What a strange piece of writing, very interesting but strange...

A lack of sub editors methinks at The Age. 

The open admission that Tommy and Roos didn't get on very well is interesting.  It's clear that he is enjoying his time under Goody and also that he has been given more license and confidence to talk as a leader of the club.  Also offers an interesting insight into that infamous pre-season camp rift that destroyed our season according to the media at the time.

Edited by Rodney (Balls) Grinter

 

At least we know why he wasn't included in the leadership group; which, of course, doesn't mean he doesn't have a leadership role to play.

18 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

The open admission that Tommy and Roos didn't get on very well is interesting.  It's clear that he is enjoying his time under Goody and also that he has been given more license and confidence to talk as a leader of the club.  Also offers an interesting insight into that infamous pre-season camp rift that destroyed our season according to the media at the time.

I'll use a  "two way running" analogy  - old school coaches like Neeld ( I know we can debate whether Neeld was a coach at all) are one way runners - their way or the highway - can work well for an established side full of stars but not for a team that needs to be developed. Roos was among the first of the modern day coaches to really nurture and take feedback from players. From what i understand Goody is even more embracing of two way relationships or two way running with the players. I like it as it does put much more responsibility on the footballers for how they play and at the end of the day they are the only ones who can kick the footy. It can be uncomfortable when it seems that you get a mass revolt of players to a training camp but that's the price you pay for allowing the players so much input and feedback into what they are doing . 

It doesn't surprise me that someone like McDonald would gel better with Goody than Roos. I get that this coaching approach is not liked by all but i am a fan of making the footballers much more accountable for how they play ( I thoroughly detest when the coach gets blamed for the players "not turning up to play")


3 hours ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

The open admission that Tommy and Roos didn't get on very well is interesting.  It's clear that he is enjoying his time under Goody and also that he has been given more license and confidence to talk as a leader of the club.  Also offers an interesting insight into that infamous pre-season camp rift that destroyed our season according to the media at the time.

Roos' greatest strength is probably his weakness.  Pretty sure all under him understand what he wants all the time, and those methods have worked well.  Only a Robbie Walls or an Andy Demetriou might disagree.

But there is an element of Sheedy/Wallace that I loved which was looking for the edge (Roos would call a trick perhaps), and leaving no stoned unturned in terms of what-if.

Tom Mc might just be the most valuable KPP forward in the game.  He might actually be my first picked.  If 2018 wasn't a blip, and McDonald becomes (as I think he will), in the top 3 forwards in the game, then Roos needs to acknowledge.

 

Not many excuses when a team has many games that are decided by half time, to explore the what ifs.

 

 

Before Melbourne, I challenged anyone to have a go at Roos' recruiting record of those that played AFL before.  It was 2nd to none.  Can't remember a player he let go of at Sydney that shone.  But his decision to stay head-strong with McDonald for instance, meant that maybe Dunn +/- Howe were too easily let go as tall back options.

 

Refreshing that players are honest BTW, about a less than imperfect relationship with a coach.

  • 5 weeks later...

What the hell has happened to TMac?

There is no doubt he is playing injured or is terribly unfit. He is probably missing Hogan more than any other player.

Or is there more to it? He might need another sit down with the psychologist. There were several times today he looked totally lost and out of confidence and position. 

Hard to believe this guy was getting Bronx cheers today,  but they were warranted. He's barely been sighted all season. 

 

Edited by Hell Bent
Spelling

A key reason why we’re 1-4 and soon to be 1-5 on Wednesday is T Mac’s disgraceful form this year.

Every MFC supporter had their dreams and hopes in the hands of T Mac and he’s totally stunk up the joint this year. 

I’m not buying he’s injured. I’m buying into the fact that he’s [censored] the bed this year (like a few of his mates) and needs to turn around his and our season ASAP.

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell

 

Going at everything one-handed and trying to hold the oppo off with the other arm

Classic Demons trait to have a good year in a contract year in 2018.....

Looks miles off the pace currently

He has been absolutely non existent. He looked Carey like in our mcg finals last year. You almost forget he’s out there.


Slow, sluggish and unfit. Excruciating to watch.

If he isn’t right then put him I’m for surgery now....the seasons over. An absolute liability at the moment.

 

9 hours ago, Beetle said:

Slow, sluggish and unfit. Excruciating to watch.

If he isn’t right then put him I’m for surgery now....the seasons over. An absolute liability at the moment.

 

 

F6B9866E-10B0-4D2E-B6E7-8A780D56B88A.jpeg

He got an easy ride with Hogan taking the best defender and double team last few years, now has nowhere to hide.


4 minutes ago, TheoX said:

He got an easy ride with Hogan taking the best defender and double team last few years, now has nowhere to hide.

He’s not playing well at the moment but that’s harsh.

1 hour ago, TheoX said:

He got an easy ride with Hogan taking the best defender and double team last few years, now has nowhere to hide.

If that’s the case, why was it that our best wins over the previous 2 seasons were when Hogan was out injured? 

TMac is one of the besty endurance athletes at he Club. He is obviously :

  • Playing injured
  • Still has enormous pride in playng for MFC  because I do not think anyone bleeds more at losing/playing poorly
  • Suffering from the delivery coming into the fowsd line. SG suggested last night that we are not connecting from mid to fwd.
  • He (SG) may have added we are nto defending from Mid/Fwd.

All of these things combined mean that life is pretty difficult for a KPF at MFC at the moment

5 hours ago, TheoX said:

He got an easy ride with Hogan taking the best defender and double team last few years, now has nowhere to hide.

 

4 hours ago, Tim said:

If that’s the case, why was it that our best wins over the previous 2 seasons were when Hogan was out injured? 

Exactly Tim.

He didn’t actually click with Jesse.  Best games for Tom, and for MFC, were without Jesse

 


Both Weid and Tmcd need to BLOODY SHOW SOME HEART. Their lack of heart and at the contest is painful.  

Both signed up for big $$ and not repaying the club. 

1 hour ago, monoccular said:

 

Exactly Tim.

He didn’t actually click with Jesse.  Best games for Tom, and for MFC, were without Jesse

 

Best games from Tom is when he plays high half-forward.   He's a tall midfielder, who happens to be strong overhead. 

He's not a deep forwards shoelace.

And our delivery into our forwards atmo,  is atrocious.

Edited by DV8

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 89 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 326 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies