Jump to content

Featured Replies

7 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

BS

?

7 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Weak. 

A fine should have been suffice,  for that tweak the the chest.

Just because a players has priors, does not mean he is automatically guilty, accordingly. 

this decisions is carp.

 

Absolute joke. [censored] AFL HQ.

I know it's not the done thing...for Melbourne....but I'd be promoting our concerns to the media leaving nothing to misinterpretation. 

This is what Eddy does. Good on him.

Jeff wouldn't let this rest either.

 

 

Do you get fined for speaking out against the AFL as player? Just curious...

If I was suspended incorrectly I wouldn’t be towing the party line, I’d be saying ‘I now can’t play because an incorrect decision has been made. The AFL made a mistake and change needs to happen for the good of the game’ etc.

I’m so sick of the change that’s happening to the game. The new rules are brain dead. The new 50 meter penalty rule seems like it was created by a 10 year old for backyard footy. Ughhhhhhh [censored]

9 minutes ago, Neil Crompton said:

I guess the tribunal didn’t read the 12 pages of expert witness statements on this site.

i also guess that Oscar and Frosty get another chance to redeem themselves

Port don’t have Kennedy and Darling.  The boys will be right!!


The AFL is a joke in all facets!

How do these morons get away with it and get paid a ridiculous amount of money doing it? There as pathetic as the people who run this country!

absolute bs, fück the afl 

 

As the MFC goes harder at the ball, this supporter site becomes softer.

Some very cringe worthy posts here.

The May hit was perfect.

 

 

 

 

i bet ya if a richmond player was invovled in a similar incident, he would get off with a fine. they are so fückin biased 


Just now, sisso said:

Urgh, Westhoff always gives us trouble too.....

No Dixon this time around, which helps and hopefully Ryder doesn’t get up.  

11 minutes ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

 

 

 

 

This is a new paradigm - the potential to cause injury. We’re now in a new world where impact is no longer based on consequence but opinion.

just another AFL interpretation like OOB intent. This game is so far into the grey it’s ridiculous.

4 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

Port don’t have Kennedy and Darling.  The boys will be right!!

yeah but i wanted May to scare the bejesus out of Watts

Just like when it decided to clamp down on tanking, the AFL again decide to use Melbourne “to make an example of “ for removing indirect head high contact from a player holding his ground... easy target to send a message  . I’m glad the club at least contested it 

and mummy still got off for an intentional hit to the head ... FMD 

 


2 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

so who do we appeal the appeal to?

The court of public opinion.

Time to go to war against these dimwalts.

 

And special kudos to May for putting us into this position even after the following incidents had happened:

Preuss injures his groin. Probably out round 1

Viney cops a corkey

Jones cops a corkey

VDB throws a punch

JFK cops a 3 month injury and probably his career

Harmes appeared to (at the time) cop a 2 month finger injury 

Smith runs around with a sore groin probably robbing him of a round 1 gig

Fritsch injures his hip.

Oliver costs us the game with a stupid punch when we had momentum.

and finally May’s 2 seconds of stupidity which will no doubt see Westhoff tear us a new one.

 

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell

There's a lesson to be learned somewhere in this saga.  I hope it's well learned.

20 minutes ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

 

 

 

 

Must be an afl tribunal where ‘it’s the vibe’ argument carries weight. 


1 minute ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

And special kudos to May for putting us into this position even after the following incidents had happened:

Preuss injures his groin. Probably out round 1

Viney cops a corkey

Jones cops a corkey

VDB throws a punch

JFK cops a 3 month injury and probably his career

Harmes appeared to (at the time) cop a 2 month finger injury 

Smith runs around with a sore groin robbing him of a round 1 gig

Fritsch injures his hip.

Oliver costs us a game with a stupid punch when we had momentum.

and finally May’s 2 seconds of stupidity which will no doubt see Westhoff tear us a new one.

 

OMG I had no idea - sack the bastard

9 minutes ago, Tom Dyson said:

i bet ya if a richmond player was invovled in a similar incident, he would get off with a fine. they are so fückin biased 

Cotchin did, for a worse hit that put Shiel out of a Preliminary Final.

 

Seriously...it's time to take it up to these Bozos.

Fair dinkum clubs don't take this rubbish without giving it back.

The AFL think we're a soft target. 

Yeah it's bull[censored] but let's take a positive it puts May on notice now, no doubt this won't have gone down well with the coaches or club leaders. The decision like it or not is the right one in the AFL eyes. Better that May learns he's lesson now then during the year when it could potentially be a worse scenario


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 6 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 231 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
      • Clap
    • 47 replies