Any AFL players stupid enough to read these childish would just have a laugh. One of the great traditions of our code is the mateship which transcends club loyalty. You only have to watch the players having a friendly chat post-game to see this. The Jimmy stuff should be left in the past. 

If you vomit in the gutter do you lick it up - Ah no, I think not 

22 minutes ago, layzie said:

Definitely do not want back.

Weren’t you making the case for him to come back? Haha 

Just now, Wolfturdo said:

Weren’t you making the case for him to come back? Haha 

No, I wasn’t. If you read back through this thread I never suggested it either.

The most complimentary thing I said was that we could use a player with similar running ability. 

Can we really blame a bloke who left a rabble of a club at the time for $1m+ a year. Who are we kidding?

Having said that, I would have concerns about his longevity, given his knee issues and injuries of late

Edited October 1, 20186 yr by Demons1858

And what happens if he does come back here and contributes to winning a premiership? I was initially against the idea but if our FD and our leadership team support the idea, I'd support the club. At the end of the day, the best thing for the club is winning premierships and if he can contribute, I'll put my previous hatred aside.

15 minutes ago, A F said:

And what happens if he does come back here and contributes to winning a premiership? I was initially against the idea but if our FD and our leadership team support the idea, I'd support the club. At the end of the day, the best thing for the club is winning premierships and if he can contribute, I'll put my previous hatred aside.

He ain't coming here, though. Melbourne would be the last club he would play for IMO. 

Can't imagine why he would want to come back to a club whose supporters have made it abundantly clear that he is utterly despised.  The booing of him in the early matches was unlike anything I've ever heard from our supporters.

4 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

He ain't coming here, though. Melbourne would be the last club he would play for IMO. 

You're more than likely right.

Is there a toilet that needs to be cleaned?

wait...what's that pink thing with a curly tail flying across the sky....

Yeah we are looking for a skinny little outside player who can't kick over a jam tin with the charisma of Elliot Goblet on mogadon.

4 minutes ago, Stretch Johnson said:

Yeah we are looking for a skinny little outside player who can't kick over a jam tin with the charisma of Elliot Goblet on mogadon.

Couldn't get a Jack Watts comment in there?

You're slipping, Stretcher..

1 minute ago, jumbo returns said:

 

You're slipping, Stretcher..

Yeah nah.

In the greatest form of my life.

Sadly, its probably the best it gets.

Even if S$$$cully was on fire, I would not even ... on him

why the [censored] is this thread still showing up on the first page of demonland?! jayzus..

21 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Even if S$$$cully was on fire, I would not even ... on him

Agree SONS, Wouldn't even want him even if the Giants offered to pay his entire salary.

45 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Even if S$$$cully was on fire, I would not even ... on him

But would Max throw up on him?

On 9/12/2018 at 1:11 PM, Demon3564 said:

Say we don't get Gaff, would we consider Tom Scully back if he became available?

NO [censored] WAY KNOWN MONGREL BLUDGER OF A HUMAN MONEY HUNGRY 

The tribe has spoken. 

18 minutes ago, layzie said:

The tribe has spoken. 

Sounded more like a cacophony of grunts

Scully perhaps to Hawthorn is the rumour from SEN this morning.

GWS must  have some serious salary cap issues if they need to shed him as well as Sheils

On 10/1/2018 at 7:18 PM, monoccular said:

But would Max throw up on him?

One more time with feeling.

Is his father still part of the deal???

Contrast the way that the Geelong supporters handled Ablett's departure, versus the way our supporters handle Scully's departure.

During his time here, we were a rabble.  Senior players and staff used to pull Scully down with the "over-training" accusation, rather than seeing that a 19 year old was actually setting decent training standards.

Why would he come back here, playing for supporters that really have half a brain.

 

Clarko is on the money.  Scully has had his pay-day and will now accept unders.  Clarko is reaping the rewards of trading out dead wood when it should happen; not 3 years after.