Jump to content

Featured Replies

It's a shame that he hasn't fulfilled his early promise, but I've never been convinced that he'd be a consistent high level performer.  Form and attitude have held him back, but in recent years it's been his body that's let him down.  Maybe a new environment will see that luck change.

We wont be getting a decent draft pick for him, 4th... maybe 3rd if we're very lucky.

To tell you the truth, I would have done a straight swap for Goddard or Freeman, but they've been delisted so that's no help now.

Billy Longer?

Jack Lonie?

 
1 hour ago, Fifty-5 said:

Maybe the Saints have to send their 1st round pick 3 or 2019 1st round to Sydney for Hannebury and get a pick back they can use for Kent?

Sydney have 31 and 34 or thereabouts.

Alternatively they could offer a future 2nd for Kent but that would stop them being able to use future 1st vfor Hannebury.

I reckon this will drag on in trade week.

Yep on reflection I'm dreaming. Saints pick 57 will probably get it done and move on.

Weird that Saints delist Freeman who had finally got his body right but was given only two games to show his wares and they trade in Kent whose body is no more reliable!  Even if they do get Kent on the cheap it still seems not much improvement. 

Saints have done almost as bad a job as we did and Carlton are doing with their top 10 picks and their development.  They will be in a world of pain for some time to come, especially as they have little trade currency this year.  Not the best place for Kent to go to but he probably had little choice and little interest from others.

Wish him all the best at Moorrabbin.

 
1 hour ago, Wiseblood said:

The problem is that he can't consistently keep himself fit, and hasn't done so for years. We are rightly offering what seems to be a one year deal, and the Saints have offered him three which gives him more security, both for his career and his family, long term. 

I do like Kent though and feel he could be a best 22 player if fit, but what choice does the club have with a bloke who has struggled with injuries for 3-4 years now? A one year deal is fair at our end, but do is his choice for a longer deal elsewhere. 

I agree he has played 63 games over 6 years. An average of 10 games per season is not flash. His body is simply not robust enough for the top level.

24 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

It's a shame that he hasn't fulfilled his early promise, but I've never been convinced that he'd be a consistent high level performer.  Form and attitude have held him back, but in recent years it's been his body that's let him down.  Maybe a new environment will see that luck change.

We wont be getting a decent draft pick for him, 4th... maybe 3rd if we're very lucky.

To tell you the truth, I would have done a straight swap for Goddard or Freeman, but they've been delisted so that's no help now.

Billy Longer?

Jack Lonie?

Take the draft pick and punt on a kid or state leaguer 


Pick 3 ought to get it done. We could use Izak Rankine.

I wonder if, in the chaos of trade period, and throw all the other ifs in like Hogan actually going, it could happen?

Picks bounce along, we end up with an existing top-10, package it with Kent and maybe something else, get pick 3, get the precise player we most need.

Yes, obviously I'm just yanking the chain, like everyone else at this time of year.

 

Kenty was always one of my fave players.  Bummer hes gone but definitely the right move by him.

All the best DK, hope you get your body right and play some great footy.

Has been pretty much best 22 when fit, so interested in why he would jump ship. It's not like he wasn't getting the opportunity here, it was simply his own body holding him back.

Unfortunately he isn't worth much on the trade table either, so I'm not expecting much in return tbh.

 
1 hour ago, rjay said:

Is this something you know 'dazzle'?

Maybe in a swap that involved another player?

I think Billings is very talented but has been underwhelming at the Saints, it's these type of players I would be looking at if we think we can turn them around.

I think we should focus on the inconsistent players on our list (Petracca) before we try to grab inconsistent players on other lists and make them guns 

6 minutes ago, Forest Demon said:

Has been pretty much best 22 when fit, so interested in why he would jump ship. It's not like he wasn't getting the opportunity here, it was simply his own body holding him back.

Unfortunately he isn't worth much on the trade table either, so I'm not expecting much in return tbh.

Id say it would probably be the security of a 3 year contract. Cant see us offering close to that


5 minutes ago, Forest Demon said:

Has been pretty much best 22 when fit, so interested in why he would jump ship. It's not like he wasn't getting the opportunity here, it was simply his own body holding him back.

Unfortunately he isn't worth much on the trade table either, so I'm not expecting much in return tbh.

He was clear it was for job security.  Like we got Lewis by offering 3 when Hawks offered 1.  Suspect about the same

I really hope we're not playing inside mids like Jones and Tyson on the wing again in 2019...

If the Saints have offered 3 years and we've offered 1 year then its a no brainer for Kent.

Struggled to be consistently available but he has pace which we need more of in the team.

22 minutes ago, Forest Demon said:

Has been pretty much best 22 when fit, so interested in why he would jump ship. It's not like he wasn't getting the opportunity here, it was simply his own body holding him back.

Unfortunately he isn't worth much on the trade table either, so I'm not expecting much in return tbh.

His managers comments was around the fact he has job stability with a 3 year deal now he has a "new family" presumably more $$ than at the Dees and has been promised midfield minutes.. 

10 minutes ago, GCDee said:

His managers comments was around the fact he has job stability with a 3 year deal now he has a "new family" presumably more $$ than at the Dees and has been promised midfield minutes.. 

Can't see how he has the tank to spend time in the midfield - burst half forward only I would have thought 

16 minutes ago, demoniac said:

I really hope we're not playing inside mids like Jones and Tyson on the wing again in 2019...

If the Saints have offered 3 years and we've offered 1 year then its a no brainer for Kent.

Struggled to be consistently available but he has pace which we need more of in the team.

must say I'm not that happy about him leaving in the sense that he has potential but no way would we offer a three year deal (one plus one perhaps) so best wishes Dean and may you star against everyone but us.


2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Good luck Kenty. Had a lot of skill, but his body keeps breaking. 

Why would you request a trade to the Aints?

oh well, your choice

While money and length of contract might have something to do with it, surely any footballer wants to play football at the top level. Going to St Kilda gives him a much better chance of playing consistently in the seniors than staying with us or going to another strong team. 

I see this as a sensible move by him and I hope we can facilitate it for him. I have found him to be a frustrating footballer. Has shown some excellent cameos but too often has also "gone missing" for extended periods. He's also held back by his inability to kick on his right foot.

Just now, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

While money and length of contract might have something to do with it, surely any footballer wants to play football at the top level. Going to St Kilda gives him a much better chance of playing consistently in the seniors than staying with us or going to another strong team. 

I see this as a sensible move by him and I hope we can facilitate it for him. I have found him to be a frustrating footballer. Has shown some excellent cameos but too often has also "gone missing" for extended periods. He's also held back by his inability to kick on his right foot.

I get all that. But success will not be at St. Kilda for a fair while yet

His call, i wouldn’t touch them

1 hour ago, Steno said:

2013 = 15games

2014 = 13

2015 =4

2016 = 20

2017 = 6

2018 = 5

So averaging less than 9 games a year for the last four years... that ain't equal second round: and that's before you look at his talent.

3 year contract offered? If you are Dean Kent, you have to take it with open arms. If you are Melbourne, you would (hopefully) not be offering 3 years based on above!!

Has to be a 2nd to 3rd round pick 25-35, he's a quality goal sneak who's had an unlucky run, plenty of football left in Kenty.

Sad to see him go.

9 minutes ago, Win4theAges said:

Has to be a 2nd to 3rd round pick 25-35, he's a quality goal sneak who's had an unlucky run, plenty of football left in Kenty.

Sad to see him go.

Really?  We paid around mid 20 for Melksham and Hibberd, and I know which ones I MUCH prefer...

The gap between Kent's best and worst football is immense and he spends 90% of his time on the injury list.

St Kilda are welcome to him at any price, especially if a three year contract is what it would take to keep him.


3 minutes ago, The Chazz said:

Really?  We paid around mid 20 for Melksham and Hibberd, and I know which ones I MUCH prefer...

There good for it the saints, he's a goal sneak.?

3 minutes ago, Win4theAges said:

There good for it the saints, he's a goal sneak.?

Be surprised if we don't get offered, and accept, a 3rd rounder for him.

5 hours ago, ManDee said:

Cost them 2 first rounders.

 

Kent for Billings and a Pick! ??

 

At best I’d say late second round pick but I imagine we’ll do it for a 3rd rounder. I like Kent and will be sad to see him go as I would have him in our best squad but he’s not a critical cog in the line up. 

3 minutes ago, Pates said:

At best I’d say late second round pick but I imagine we’ll do it for a 3rd rounder. I like Kent and will be sad to see him go as I would have him in our best squad but he’s not a critical cog in the line up. 

I think it will be a 4th. Players like Kent aren't worth much in a trade.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 11

    Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

      • Thanks
    • 75 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Sydney

    The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Brisbane

    “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Southport

    The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

      • Thanks
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Sydney

    Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

      • Thanks
    • 295 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Brisbane

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 35 replies
    Demonland