Apparently Josh "Superman" Mahoney will be on SEN in the next 15 to 20 minutes.

I'm at dinner* so reports would be appreciated.

* I could listen in on my iPhone but knowing she who must be obeyed the thing might end up in my soup

Haha. I wonder if this thread will be as wild as the other one.

Go Josh (and the team you are a mouthpiece for which would include Viney and Taylor)! I never doubted you.

Haha. I wonder if this thread will be as wild as the other one.

Go Josh (and the team you are a mouthpiece for which would include Viney and Taylor)! I never doubted you.

I just want him to be honest with us. (Followed by an eye roll)

Adding surety to what we get at 3 and then again with 7.

We should bring in two potential A grade players.

Really impressed with Tom - super competitive, great runner, midfield and down back. We think him coming in help our young group of guys.

We have a bit of work to do on who we pick; could be tall and a mid, two midfielders.

Fitzy - Hawthorn wanted to get the deal done, they wanted it done now so they gave us pick 94 so they could get them today instead of in the next 10 days.

Mahoney wants to go home and not worry tomorrow but thinks he'll get some calls about the picks.

guess the Tigers lost interest in Jack Grimes

That'll do, Josh. That'll do.

Gotta wonder who the player we are trading pick 3 and 7 for.

Apparently Josh "Superman" Mahoney will be on SEN in the next 15 to 20 minutes.

I'm at dinner* so reports would be appreciated.

* I could listen in on my iPhone but knowing she who must be obeyed the thing might end up in my soup

Tell her you're looking up holiday destinations where you might take her.

Gotta wonder who the player we are trading pick 3 and 7 for.

Dangerfield. We're still a chance.

Adding surety to what we get at 3 and then again with 7.

We should bring in two potential A grade players

Really impressed with Tom - super competitive, great runner, midfield and down back. We think him coming in help our young group of guys.

We have a bit of work to do on who we pick; could be tall and a mid, two midfielders.

Fitzy - Hawthorn wanted to get the deal done, they wanted it done now so they gave us pick 94 so they could get them today instead of in the next 10 days.

Mahoney wants to go home and not worry tomorrow but thinks he'll get some calls about the picks.

And if those calls are compelling, we should deal! Someone else raised it on another thread I think, but would we entertain Essendons top 2 picks for ours?

And if those calls are compelling, we should deal! Someone else raised it on another thread I think, but would we entertain Essendons top 2 picks for ours?

I would if the bombers are hellbent on landing Parish

And if those calls are compelling, we should deal! Someone else raised it on another thread I think, but would we entertain Essendons top 2 picks for ours?

I don't get why, we can take the best midfielder and 1 KPP (hopefully Curnow).

It is clear that GC are looking a bit outside the box, if be thinking Milera but who knows.

Essendon will take Francis and one other so we will still have our pick! I think

What about pick 3 and 7 for Kennedy?

What about pick 3 and 7 for Kennedy?

F that, Parker...

Go to this page:

The Run Home:

http://www.sen.com.au/programs/the-run-home#lYjqT8GP46drAdip.97

select latest audio.....for Josh.....

It would appear that the footy dept achieved exactly ALL of its trading targets.

Turns out we played the 'academy draft points' game better than any other club.

Turns out we got all of our trade-in player targets at appropriately low cost.

Turns out we did manage to line up pick 3 to target the player we've obviously identified long ago, despite Howe being a [censored] goblin.

Turns out we could get ourselves a second top-10 pick (lucky 7, too!), and made sure we could pick up one of the multiple good tall forward options available.

Overall movement;

In - 3, 7, Kennedy, Bugg, Melksham

Out - 6, 25, [First rounder 2016], Howe, Toumpas

It's a nice move to trade forward a year, too. Gives the additional gun kid a year of being Roos-ed.

Someone else raised it on another thread I think, but would we entertain Essendons top 2 picks for ours?

You rang ?

Josh Mahoney 'We wont trade pick 3 and 10'

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-10-21/we-wont-trade-picks-no3-no10-mahoney

Not!

I would if the bombers are hellbent on landing Parish

And we aren't.

Josh Mahoney 'We wont trade pick 3 and 10'

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-10-21/we-wont-trade-picks-no3-no10-mahoney

Not!

He didn't, he traded 10.

He didn't, he traded 10.

touche!

It would appear that the footy dept achieved exactly ALL of its trading targets.

Turns out we played the 'academy draft points' game better than any other club.

Turns out we got all of our trade-in player targets at appropriately low cost.

Turns out we did manage to line up pick 3 to target the player we've obviously identified long ago, despite Howe being a [censored] goblin.

Turns out we could get ourselves a second top-10 pick (lucky 7, too!), and made sure we could pick up one of the multiple good tall forward options available.

Overall movement;

In - 3, 7, Kennedy, Bugg, Melksham

Out - 6, 25, [First rounder 2016], Howe, Toumpas

It's a nice move to trade forward a year, too. Gives the additional gun kid a year of being Roos-ed.

Who would have thought the word "hob" would be censored.

Josh Mahoney 'We wont trade pick 3 and 10'

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-10-21/we-wont-trade-picks-no3-no10-mahoney

Not!

I don't know why he even comes out to say that. I get that it's a bargaining chip and he's just playing the game but at the same time, don't put yourself in a corner. At least say, "I would think 3 and 7 are untouchable" and then if asked if they would be traded for the right deal, "Well it would need to be a pretty special offer."

If Sydney offered us Kennedy for pick 3 and, say, Watts + 43, we'd have to take that.

I don't know why he even comes out to say that. I get that it's a bargaining chip and he's just playing the game but at the same time, don't put yourself in a corner. At least say, "I would think 3 and 7 are untouchable" and then if asked if they would be traded for the right deal, "Well it would need to be a pretty special offer."

If Sydney offered us Kennedy for pick 3 and, say, Watts + 43, we'd have to take that.

Reckon Kennedy too old to waste pick 3 on, he's 27 with 3-4 good years left

Parker for 7?