Jump to content

Viv Michie

Featured Replies

Posted

not much said about michie

had a great game. 19 possessions from 60% game time. most inside 50's, no critical errors, no frees against

conditions suited him being an inside player without great speed, but nevertheless very effective and composed

 

not much said about michie

had a great game. 19 possessions from 60% game time. most inside 50's, no critical errors, no frees against

conditions suited him being an inside player without great speed, but nevertheless very effective and composed

Contract expires end of the season.

Viv is exactly what you want from a B-grade player. He works hard, wins his own ball and rarely makes a mistake with it. It's great that he's into the side now and if he keeps up with this form he should stay there for a while.

 

Probably wouldn't have had the chance if Viney was still in the team so I guess that's a positive.

Give him a full game next week - hopefully he can produce another fine performance.

Clean as anyone in the wet. Keeps playing like he did last night and i could see him become an important player for us and play the year out.

One of our most skilful players on our list and is a ball magnet. Him and Newton add toughness and class to our side.


Grabbed his chance last night.

Superb effort.

Really did. Consistency is the only thing he needs to provide now, and he becomes core.

Really did. Consistency is the only thing he needs to provide now, and he becomes core.

Who for? Newton, Viney?
 

Could hardly run in the last 5 minutes - I'm sure the knee in ribs didn't help - he'll be better for the run.

Blessings in disguise last night. Frost goes out, Griffiths gets injured, Viv comes on and the rain comes down.

Made the most of his chance.

[censored] I hate the sub rule.


Fantastic half of footy from Viv, would be pretty surprised if he doesn't play a full game next week against his old mob.

Seeing the fruits of not gifting games. Love seeing players work their ar$e off for a spot and grabbing it with both hands.

Makes me appreciate how far we have come under Roos. Imagine brining Blease on as a sub last night...shudders.

Who for? Newton, Viney?

Maybe for neither. The reality is that we will always have a few players out. Most unusual was that we started this year with only two (Petracca and Trengove). Although he adds depth, it may not necessarily be at the expense of anyone. After all, how many predicted that VandeBerg would be in our starting 22 each week and Grimes not?

Who for? Newton, Viney?

The key is to find more than enough mids.

If we can add Michie to the group, then we keep applying pressure on Newton, Viney, Tyson etc., and we add depth where we need it most.


If Viv, Viney and Newton keep improving, by years end, Cross may find himself on the outer.

And so he should. I'll say nothing against him, he's hard, professional and never stops working but the reality is that he's past his prime. There is a very good reason the Doggies delisted him. In our poor midfield he's been a great addition, but as we improve he's going to once again find himself a bit too slow and limited. That's where he'll complete his transition into a playing coach and then a straight-out development coach. As my friend from Doggieland said, if we want to be competitive he can't be one of our best 22 players.

If Viv, Viney and Newton keep improving, by years end, Cross may find himself on the outer.

Young Crossy is just about out of gas unfortunately. He is such a wonderful example to the team but the old legs just show a bit more now even with his super work ethic. If he is still playing next year we have not progressed quite enough or maybe if he is still on the list but spends his time playing for Casey to again drive high performance.

If Viv, Viney and Newton keep improving, by years end, Cross may find himself on the outer.

I would love it if it was improvement and not injuries that saw these guys become 'core', however Cross has been superb. It would be a fair level of improvement by them before Cross was not considered best 22.

Michie was great and as mentioned, has all the attributes to become an important foot soldier in our midfield rotation.

Also agree with the remarks re: Cross. He's been great since he's come across, but expect by the end of the year he should be struggling to hold a spot. Wouldn't be against giving him 1 more year, as long as it's mainly just to play at Casey and be available to call upon if we have a bad run with injuries. Would be nice to help him get to 250 AFL games.


I don't disagree that the end is near for cross, (and I kind of expected it to have happened already) but his numbers are still really solid and he is hard at the contest which is what is both getting us into and also winning us games, when he can't do that send him to the pet food factory (joke).

Sometimes when you go to a game live, it is difficult to tell who some of the best players are because you don't have a single focus like a TV camera. But last night, from Viv's first possession, both my kids and I noticed him. He seemed to be in everything from the inside tough stuff, to the two way run, and the forward momentum. There is no way he can be dropped or made sub for next week.

It looks like Roos' love of midfielders, and making Casey players earn their place through form over a number of weeks is producing a really strong mix of midfield players.

Very good inside. Strong and tough. Still concerned about his pace and 2 way running ability. Keen to see him in the dry.

 

Young Crossy is just about out of gas unfortunately. He is such a wonderful example to the team but the old legs just show a bit more now even with his super work ethic. If he is still playing next year we have not progressed quite enough or maybe if he is still on the list but spends his time playing for Casey to again drive high performance.

Cross is still doing his job, he took Ellis last night and whilst he (Ellis) got a bit of the ball he had next to no effect.

Cross is still doing his job, he took Ellis last night and whilst he (Ellis) got a bit of the ball he had next to no effect.

yes he is.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 132 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 308 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 907 replies